Component Approved Translated Unfinished Unfinished words Unfinished characters Untranslated Checks Suggestions Comments
Glossary Privacy Badger GPL-3.0 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Website (excluding FAQ) AGPL-3.0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Website FAQ AGPL-3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Overview

Project website privacybadger.org
Instructions for translators

Thank you for your interest in translating the Privacy Badger website!

To translate FAQ questions and answers, visit the FAQs component. To translate everything else, visit the general strings component.

Please DO NOT USE MACHINE TRANSLATION ("automatic suggestions") without fully reviewing and editing.

To add a language, please email extension-devs@eff.org.
Project maintainers User avatar ghostwords
Language English
Language code en
Text direction Left to right
Number of speakers 1,728,900,209
4 days ago

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 133 3,547 26,944
Approved 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Waiting for review 29% 39 2% 90 2% 576
Translated 100% 133 100% 3,547 100% 26,944
Needs editing 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Read-only 70% 94 97% 3,457 97% 26,368
Failing checks 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

0 changes 2 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 13 changes 0 changes 2 changes 6 changes 2 changes 1 change 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 5 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 5 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Quick numbers

3,547
Hosted words
133
Hosted strings
100%
Translated
1
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

+6%
Hosted words
+100%
+3%
Hosted strings
+100%
—
Translated
+100%
+100%
Contributors
—
User avatar None

Source string added
Privacy Badger _does_ contain a "[yellowlist](https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/src/data/yellowlist.txt)" of some sites that are known to provide essential third party resources; those sites show up as yellow and have their cookies blocked rather than being blocked entirely. This is a compromise with practicality, and in the long term we hope to phase out the yellowlist as these third parties begin to [explicitly commit to respecting Do Not Track](https://www.eff.org/dnt-policy). The criteria for including a domain on the yellowlist can be [found here](https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/doc/yellowlist-criteria.md).
4 days ago
User avatar None

Source string added
We are doing things in this order because the most scandalous, intrusive and objectionable form of online tracking is that conducted by companies you've [often never heard of](https://lumapartners.com/content/lumascapes/display-ad-tech-lumascape/) and have no relationship with. First and foremost, Privacy Badger is there to enforce Do Not Track against these domains by providing the technical means to restrict access to their tracking scripts and images. The right policy for whether nytimes.com, facebook.com or google.com can track you _when you visit that site_ – and the technical task of preventing it – is more complicated because often (though not always) tracking is interwoven with the features the site offers, and sometimes (though not always) users may understand that the price of an excellent free tool like Google's search engine is measured in privacy, not money.
4 days ago
User avatar None

Source string added
GPC is meant to be a legally-binding request to all companies in places with applicable privacy laws. For example, [the California Consumer Privacy Act](https://theccpa.org) gives California residents the right to opt out of having their data sold. By sending the GPC signal, Privacy Badger is telling companies that you would like to exercise your rights. And while Privacy Badger only enforces DNT compliance against third-party domains, GPC applies to everyone -- the first-party sites you visit, and any third-party trackers they might invite in.
4 days ago
User avatar None

Resource updated
The “po/faqs.pot” file was changed. 4 days ago
User avatar None

String added in the repository
Privacy Badger _does_ contain a "[yellowlist](https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/src/data/pbconfig.json)" of some sites that are known to provide essential third party resources; those sites show up as yellow and have their cookies blocked rather than being blocked entirely. This is a compromise with practicality, and in the long term we hope to phase out the yellowlist as these third parties begin to [explicitly commit to respecting Do Not Track](https://www.eff.org/dnt-policy). The criteria for including a domain on the yellowlist can be [found here](https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/doc/yellowlist-criteria.md).
Privacy Badger _does_ contain a "[yellowlist](https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/src/data/pbconfig.json)" of some sites that are known to provide essential third party resources; those sites show up as yellow and have their cookies blocked rather than being blocked entirely. This is a compromise with practicality, and in the long term we hope to phase out the yellowlist as these third parties begin to [explicitly commit to respecting Do Not Track](https://www.eff.org/dnt-policy). The criteria for including a domain on the yellowlist can be [found here](https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/doc/yellowlist-criteria.md).
4 days ago
User avatar None

String added in the repository
We are doing things in this order because the most scandalous, intrusive and objectionable form of online tracking is that conducted by companies you've [often never heard of](https://lumapartners.com/content/lumascapes/display-ad-tech-lumascape/) and have no relationship with. First and foremost, Privacy Badger is there to enforce Do Not Track against these domains by providing the technical means to restrict access to their tracking scripts and images. The right policy for whether nytimes.com, facebook.com or google.com can track you _when you visit that site_ – and the technical task of preventing it – is more complicated because often tracking is interwoven with the features the site offers.
We are doing things in this order because the most scandalous, intrusive and objectionable form of online tracking is that conducted by companies you've [often never heard of](https://lumapartners.com/content/lumascapes/display-ad-tech-lumascape/) and have no relationship with. First and foremost, Privacy Badger is there to enforce Do Not Track against these domains by providing the technical means to restrict access to their tracking scripts and images. The right policy for whether nytimes.com, facebook.com or google.com can track you _when you visit that site_ – and the technical task of preventing it – is more complicated because often tracking is interwoven with the features the site offers.
4 days ago
User avatar None

String added in the repository
GPC is meant to be a legally-binding request to all companies in places with applicable privacy laws. For example, [the California Consumer Privacy Act](https://theccpa.org) gives California residents the right to opt out of having their data sold. By sending the GPC signal, Privacy Badger is telling companies that you would like to exercise your rights.
GPC is meant to be a legally-binding request to all companies in places with applicable privacy laws. For example, [the California Consumer Privacy Act](https://theccpa.org) gives California residents the right to opt out of having their data sold. By sending the GPC signal, Privacy Badger is telling companies that you would like to exercise your rights.
4 days ago
User avatar AO_Localization_Lab

String added
track
track
a week ago
User avatar None

Resource updated
The “po/faqs.pot” file was changed. 5 months ago
User avatar None

String added in the repository
Are you surprised that ads aren't being blocked on YouTube? Privacy Badger is primarily a privacy tool, [not an ad blocker](#Why-doesn%27t-Privacy-Badger-block-all-ads). When you [visit YouTube directly](#What-about-tracking-by-the-sites-I-actively-visit%2c-like-NYTimes.com-or-Facebook.com), Privacy Badger does not block ads on YouTube because YouTube does not use ["third party" trackers](#What-is-a-third-party-tracker). If you really dislike ads, you can also install a traditional ad blocker.
Are you surprised that ads aren't being blocked on YouTube? Privacy Badger is primarily a privacy tool, [not an ad blocker](#Why-doesn%27t-Privacy-Badger-block-all-ads). When you [visit YouTube directly](#What-about-tracking-by-the-sites-I-actively-visit%2c-like-NYTimes.com-or-Facebook.com), Privacy Badger does not block ads on YouTube because YouTube does not use ["third party" trackers](#What-is-a-third-party-tracker). If you really dislike ads, you can also install a traditional ad blocker.
5 months ago
Browse all changes for this language