All translations have been updated for the Debian Bookworm version of the Debian Administrator's Handbook. Due to Debian Trixie being released soon, we hope to release the Trixie version of the book soon as well. Thus, there might only be a brief period to translate the Bookworm version of the book this time. We thank everybody who has contributed so far and hope that you continue your great work.

Overview

Project website debian-handbook.info
Instructions for translators

https://debian-handbook.info/contribute/ Mailing list for translators: <debian-handbook-translators@lists.alioth.debian.org
Project maintainers User avatar rhertzogUser avatar pereUser avatar dleidert
Translation license GNU General Public License v2.0 or later
Translation process
  • Translations can be made directly.
  • Translation suggestions can be made.
  • Any authenticated user can contribute.
  • The translation uses bilingual files.
Source code repository https://salsa.debian.org/hertzog/debian-handbook.git
Repository branch bookworm/main
Last remote commit Update PO files c274c239
User avatar dleidert authored 5 days ago
Last commit in Weblate ca-ES: Translated using Weblate. 38bab9d2
User avatar pocsenderi authored 18 hours ago
Weblate repository https://hosted.weblate.org/git/debian-handbook/12_advanced-administration/
File mask */05_packaging-system.po
Translation file Download fr-FR/05_packaging-system.po
Last change April 26, 2025, 3:18 p.m.
Last change made by None
Language French
Language code fr
Text direction Left to right
Case sensitivity Case-sensitive
Number of speakers 332,956,350
Number of plurals 2
Plural type One/other
Plurals Singular 0, 1
Plural 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, …
Plural formula n > 1
20 hours ago

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 392 10,512 95,374
Translated 96% 380 84% 8,910 81% 77,256
Needs editing 2% 11 12% 1,359 16% 15,537
Read-only 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Failing checks 11% 47 32% 3,463 34% 32,503
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 1% 1 2% 243 2% 2,581
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 10 changes 0 changes 34 changes 18 changes 2 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 15 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 72 changes 0 changes 0 changes 10 changes 0 changes
AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMar

Quick numbers

10,512
Hosted words
392
Hosted strings
96%
Translated
12
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

—
Hosted words
+100%
—
Hosted strings
+100%
+14%
Translated
+82%
+100%
Contributors
—
User avatar None

Changes committed
Changes committed 20 hours ago
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
Virtual packages used to suffer from some limitations, the most significant of which was the absence of a version number. To return to the previous example, a dependency such as <literal>Depends: libdigest-md5-perl (&gt;= 1.6)</literal>, despite the presence of Perl 5.10, would have never been considered as satisfied by the packaging system — while in fact it most likely was satisfied. Unaware of this, the package system chose the least risky option, assuming that the versions do not match.
Les paquets virtuels souffraient de quelques limitations, dont la plus importante était l'absence de numéro de version. Pour reprendre l'exemple précédent, une dépendance <literal>Depends: libdigest-md5-perl (&gt;= 1.6)</literal> n'était donc jamais satisfaite, pour le système de paquetage, par la présence de Perl 5.10 — bien qu'en réalité elle l'était probablement. Ne le sachant pas, le système de paquetage optait pour une politique du moindre risque en supposant que les versions ne correspondaient pas.
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Marked for edit

$ <userinput>dpkg --search /bin/mount</userinput>
mount: /bin/mount
$ <userinput>dpkg --search /usr/bin/mount</userinput>
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/bin/mount
$ <userinput>dpkg --search /bin/apt</userinput>
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /bin/apt
$ <userinput>dpkg --search /usr/bin/apt</userinput>
apt: /usr/bin/apt
$ <userinput>dpkg --search /bin/mount</userinput>
mount: /bin/mount
$ <userinput>dpkg --search /usr/bin/mount</userinput>
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/bin/mount
$ <userinput>dpkg --search /bin/apt</userinput>
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /bin/apt
$ <userinput>dpkg --search /usr/bin/apt</userinput>
apt: /usr/bin/apt
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
The <command>--force-confask</command> option requires <command>dpkg</command> to display the questions about the configuration files, even in cases where they would not normally be necessary. Thus, when reinstalling a package with this option, <command>dpkg</command> will ask the questions again for all of the configuration files modified or deleted by the administrator. This is very convenient, especially for reinstalling the original configuration file if it has been deleted and no other copy is available: a normal re-installation won't work, because <command>dpkg</command> considers removal as a form of legitimate modification, and, thus, doesn't install the desired configuration file.
L'option <command>--force-confask</command> demande à <command>dpkg</command> d'afficher les questions concernant les fichiers de configuration même dans les cas où cela n'est normalement plus nécessaire. Ainsi, en réinstallant un paquet avec cette option, <command>dpkg</command> posera à nouveau la question pour tous les fichiers de configuration modifiés ou supprimés par l'administrateur. C'est très pratique notamment pour réinstaller le fichier de configuration original s'il a été supprimé et si aucune copie n'est disponible : une réinstallation normale ne suffit pas car <command>dpkg</command> considère la suppression comme une forme de modification légitime et n'installe donc pas le fichier de configuration désiré.
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
<acronym>RFC</acronym> is the abbreviation of “Request For Comments”. A RFC is generally a technical document that describes what will become an Internet standard. Before becoming standardized and frozen, these standards are submitted for public review (hence their name). The <acronym>IETF</acronym> (Internet Engineering Task Force) decides on the evolution of the status of these documents (proposed standard, draft standard, or standard).
<acronym>RFC</acronym> est l'’abréviation de <foreignphrase>“Request For Comments</foreignphrase>, appel à” (requête de commentaires (en anglais). Une RFC est un document généralement technique, exposanun document technique qui décrit ce qui deviendra une norme d'Internet. Avant d'être standarde devenir normalisées et figées, ces normes sont soumises à une revuquête publiquec (d'où leur nom). C'est l'Le <acronym>IETF</acronym> <foreignphrase>(Internet Engineering Task Force)</foreignphrase> qui fait évoluer le statut de ces documents (<foreignphrase>proposed standard</foreignphrase>, <foreignphrase>draft standard</foreignphrase> ou <foreignphrase>standard</foreignphrase>, respectivement proposition de standard, brouillon de standard et standard décide de l'évolution de l'état de ces documents (proposé norme, projet de norme ou norme).
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
If you regularly use the <command>alien</command> program to install RPM packages coming from one of your providers, do not hesitate to write to them and amicably express your strong preference for the <filename>.deb</filename> format. Note that the format of the package is not everything: a <filename>.deb</filename> package built with <command>alien</command> or prepared for a version of Debian different than that which you use, or even for a derivative distribution like Ubuntu, would probably not offer the same level of quality and integration as a package specifically developed for Debian <emphasis role="distribution">Bookworm</emphasis>.
Si vous employez régulièrement la commande <command>alien</command> pour installer des paquets RPM provenant d'un de vos fournisseurs, n'hésitez pas à lui écrire pour exprimer aimablement votre vive préférence pour le format <filename>.deb</filename>. Notez cependant que le format du paquet ne fait pas tout : un paquet <filename>.deb</filename> construit avec <command>alien</command>, ou préparé pour une autre version de Debian que celle que vous utilisez, voire pour une distribution dérivée comme Ubuntu, n'offrira probablement pas le même niveau de qualité et d'intégration qu'un paquet spécifiquement mis au point pour Debian <emphasis role="distribution">JessieBookworm</emphasis>.
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
<primary>RPM Package Manager</primary>
<primary><foreignphrase>Red Hat Package Manager</foreignphrase>Gestionnaire de paquets RPM</primary>
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
<primary>Red Hat Package Manager</primary><seealso>RPM Package Manager</seealso>
<primary><foreignphrase>Red Hat Package Manager</foreignphrase></primaryprimary><seealso>Gestionnaire de paquets RPM</seealso>
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
<primary>RPM</primary><seealso>RPM Package Manager</seealso>
<primary>RPM</primary><seealso>Gestionnaire de packagequets RPM</seealso>
yesterday
User avatar alan127

Translation changed
<primary>RPM</primary><seealso>RPM Package Manager</seealso>
<primary><foreignphrase>Request For Comments</foreignphrase></primaryRPM</primary><seealso>Gestionnaire de packages RPM</seealso>
yesterday
Browse all translation changes