Translation status

32 Strings 6%
Browse Translate
2,643 Words 1%
21,381 Characters 1%

Strings status

Strings Words Characters
32 2,643 21,381
All strings Browse Translate Zen
2 3 32
Translated strings Browse Translate Zen
2 3 32
Strings waiting for review Browse Translate Zen
30 2,640 21,349
Unfinished strings Browse Translate Zen
30 2,640 21,349
Untranslated strings Browse Translate Zen
30 2,640 21,349
Unfinished strings without suggestions Browse Translate Zen

Overview

Project website github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Instructions for translators

This project is limited to Russian translation only, for now.

More detailed instructions to come.
Project maintainers User avatar brockfanning
Translation license MIT License
Translation process
  • Translations can be made directly.
  • Translation suggestions are turned off.
  • Translations are reviewed by dedicated reviewers.
  • Any authenticated user can contribute.
  • The translation uses monolingual files.
  • The translation base language can not be edited.
Source code repository https://github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Repository branch master
Last remote commit Merge pull request #542 from weblate/weblate-sdg-metadata-1-1-1a 85d59a4a6e9
User avatar brockfanning authored 7 months ago
Last commit in Weblate Translated using Weblate (Portuguese) 5afc8b49daa
User avatar brockfanning authored a month ago
Weblate repository https://hosted.weblate.org/git/sdg-metadata/1-1-1a/
File mask translations-metadata/*/17-16-1.yml
Monolingual base language file translations-metadata/en/17-16-1.yml
Translation file Download translations-metadata/fr/17-16-1.yml
Last change April 11, 2022, 4:37 p.m.
Last change made by Sylvie DeBlois
Language French
Language code fr
Text direction Left to right
Number of speakers 295,510,923
Number of plurals 2
Plural type One/other
Plurals Singular 0, 1
Plural 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, …
Plural formula n > 1
3 weeks ago

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 32 2,643 21,381
Approved 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Waiting for review 6% 2 1% 3 1% 32
Translated 6% 2 1% 3 1% 32
Needs editing 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Read-only 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Failing checks 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 93% 30 99% 2,640 99% 21,349
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Quick numbers

2,643
Hosted words
32
Hosted strings
6%
Translated
0
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

—
Hosted words
+100%
—
Hosted strings
+100%
—
Translated
+6%
—
Contributors
—
User avatar deblsyl

Translation added
2022-03-31
<p>2022-03-31</p>
2 years ago
User avatar None

Resource updated
The “translations-metadata/en/17-16-1.yml” file was changed. 2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<h2>URL:</h2>
<p><a href="http://effectivecooperation.org/">http://effectivecooperation.org/</a> </p>
<p><strong>Internationally agreed methodology and guideline URL: </strong>https://www.effectivecooperation.org/system/files/2020-09/2018_Monitoring_Guide_National_Coordinator.pdf </p>
<h2>References:</h2>
<p>Coppard, D. and C. Culey (2015). The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation&#x2019;s Contribution to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Plenary Session 1 Background Paper. Busan Global Partnership Forum, Korea.</p>
<p>Espey, Jessica; K. Walecik and M. K&#xFC;hner (2015). Follow-up and Review of the SDGs: Fulfilling our Commitments. Sustainable Development Solutions Network: A Global Initiative for the United Nations. New York: SDSN.</p>
<p>GPEDC (2018). 2018 <em>Monitoring Guide</em>. /Paris/New York. Available at: 09/2018_Monitoring_Guide_National_Coordinator.pdf </p>
<p>Hazlewood, P. (2015). Global Multi-stakeholder Partnerships: Scaling Up Public-Private Collective Impact for SDGs. Independent Research Forum, Background Paper 4: IRF2015.</p>
<p>Ocampo, J.A. and G&#xF3;mez, N. (2014). Accountable and Effective Development Cooperation in a Post-2015 era. Background Study 3: Accountability for Development Cooperation. ECOSOC: DCG Germany High-Level Symposium.</p>
<p>Ocampo, Jose Antonio (2015). A Post-2015 Monitoring and Accountability Framework. UNDESA: CDP Background Paper No. 27. ST/ESA/2015/CDP/27.</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p><strong>Data availability:</strong></p>
<p>Global aggregates are available for the 2016 and 2018 Global Partnership monitoring rounds. New data will be available after 2023. </p>
<p><strong>Time series:</strong></p>
<p>Data for countries have been compiled in 2016 and 2018. From 2023, data will be available on a rolling basis with all countries encouraged to report at least once within a four-year cycle.</p>
<p><strong>Disaggregation:</strong></p>
<p>The indicator presented as a global aggregate is generated through a bottom-up approach whereby data is collected at the country level and can therefore be disaggregated back at the level of countries (for both development cooperation providers and recipients) for national analysis and mutual dialogue. The data can also be further disaggregated according to individual indicators (i.e. specific dimensions of effective development cooperation) that are included within the multi-stakeholder frameworks.</p>
<p>To foster regional policy dialogue, disaggregation at the regional level is possible and encouraged. Some existing platforms are already using the evidence for regional monitoring, learning and policy discussions (e.g. NEPAD in Africa, the Asia-Pacific Development Effectiveness Facility in Asia-Pacific, the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, the UN Regional Economic Commissions). </p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>A monitoring guide is available to national coordinators in English, French and Spanish. A separate guide in English is also available to providers of development co-operation. The guidance is updated regularly. The guide for national coordinators is available at https://www.effectivecooperation.org/system/files/2020-09/2018_Monitoring_Guide_National_Coordinator.pdf. </p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>To reflect the universal nature of target 17.16, this indicator is presented as the global aggregate number of countries reporting progress. For any country reporting towards one (or more) multi-stakeholder development effectiveness framework(s), the country is considered to be reporting progress when, for the year of reference, the number of indicators within the framework(s) that show a positive trend is greater than the number of indicators that show a negative trend.</p>
<p><u>Countries providing development co-operation funding</u> and reporting in multi-stakeholder development effectiveness monitoring frameworks are assessed against the following elements: </p>
<ul>
<li><em>Aligning to country-defined development objectives: </em>Percentage of new development interventions whose objectives are drawn from country-led results frameworks.</li>
<li><em>Using country-led results frameworks: </em>Percentage of results indicators contained in new development interventions which are drawn from country-owned results frameworks.</li>
<li><em>Using national monitoring and statistical systems: </em>Percentage of results indicators in new development interventions which will be monitored using government sources and monitoring systems.</li>
<li><em>Using national evaluation systems: </em>Percentage of new interventions that plan a final evaluation with country government involvement.</li>
<li><em>Transparency of development cooperation</em>: Public availability of information on development cooperation according to international reporting standards. </li>
<li><em>Annual predictability of development cooperation</em>: Proportion of development cooperation disbursed as development partners had scheduled at the beginning of the year. </li>
<li><em>Medium-term predictability of development cooperation: </em>forward-looking spending plans made available to the partner government (indicative annual amounts of development cooperation support to be provided over the one-to-three years). </li>
<li><em>Development cooperation on budgets subject to parliamentary oversight: </em>share<em> </em>of development cooperation funds planned to/for the country&#x2019;s public sector that are recorded in the annual budget submitted for legislative approval.</li>
<li><em>Development cooperation delivered through country systems: </em>Proportion of development cooperation disbursed to a given country according to national regulations and systems for public financial management (i.e. budgeting, financial reporting, auditing) and procurement.</li>
<li><em>Untied aid: </em>Proportion of development cooperation that is untied.<sup><a href="#footnote-2" id="footnote-ref-2">[1]</a></sup></li>
</ul>
<p><u>Countries receiving development cooperation funding</u> and reporting in multi-stakeholder development effectiveness monitoring frameworks are assessed against the following elements:<u> </u></p>
<ol>
<li><em>Leading in setting up national priorities: </em>Countries strengthen their<em> </em>national results frameworks.</li>
<li><em>Creating an enabling environment for civil society organisations: </em>Civil society organizations operate within an environment that maximises their engagement in and contribution to development.</li>
<li><em>Promoting private sector engagement and contribution to development: </em>Quality of public-private dialogue. </li>
<li><em>Recording development cooperation on budgets subject to parliamentary oversight</em>: Share of development cooperation funds planned to/for the country&#x2019;s public sector that are recorded in the annual budget submitted for legislative approval.</li>
<li><em>Strengthening mutual accountability: </em>Mutual accountability among development actors is strengthened through inclusive reviews.</li>
<li><em>Strengthening gender equality and women&#x2019;s empowerment: </em>Existence of transparent government systems to track public allocations for gender equality and women&#x2019;s empowerment. </li>
<li><em>Strengthening domestic institutions: </em>Quality of the country&#x2019;s budgetary and public financial management.</li>
</ol>
<p>Countries providing and receiving development cooperation funding are invited to select whether they would like to report against provider-specific commitments, against recipient-specific commitments, or against both sets of commitments.</p>
<p>For countries reporting both as providers and recipients of development cooperation, progress is calculated separately based on the respective set of indicators described above. Disaggregated results will show the detailed performance in each category. For the ultimate count of the number of countries making progress, dual countries are accounted as making progress if progress is made as recipient <strong>or</strong> as provider of development cooperation. </p>
<p>The baseline for assessing progress is the latest measurement available for each specific count When no baseline exists for a country, the first measurement available for an indicator constitutes the baseline for future measurements of progress.</p>
<p>When a country meets and sustains all targets for the indicators it reports on (i.e. it is logically impossible to make further progress) it is considered as &#x201C;making progress&#x201D;. </p><div class="footnotes"><div><sup class="footnote-number" id="footnote-2">1</sup><p> Estimates currently available for countries that are members of the OECD Development Assistance Committee. Data can be found at https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TABLE7B <a href="#footnote-ref-2">&#x2191;</a></p></div></div>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) jointly compile and report the data at the global level.</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>Leading central ministry from reporting countries. Typically, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Planning, or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, depending on the division of labour within each government.</p>
<p><strong>Description:</strong></p>
<p>Representatives from the leading ministry in country governments &#x2013;- are responsible for leading the national data gathering process and country-level validation. These representatives coordinate the data collection process at the national level by consolidating data and inputs from providers of development co-operation, Civil Society Organisations, the private sector, and trade unions. For calculation of indicator 17.16.1, country governments submit the data to the OECD/UNDP Joint Support Team of the Global Partnership.</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>The data collection calendar for global data aggregation was on a biennial cycle prior to 2020. Data has been reported based on data collected in 2016 and 2018. The next monitoring round will take place starting from 2023 with data collection occurring on a rolling basis. </p>
 
2 years ago
Browse all translation changes