Translation status

32 Strings 0%
Browse Translate
2,139 Words 0%
17,035 Characters 0%

Strings status

Strings Words Characters
32 2,139 17,035
All strings Browse Translate Zen
32 2,139 17,035
Unfinished strings Browse Translate Zen
32 2,139 17,035
Untranslated strings Browse Translate Zen
32 2,139 17,035
Unfinished strings without suggestions Browse Translate Zen

Overview

Project website github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Instructions for translators

This project is limited to Russian translation only, for now.

More detailed instructions to come.
Project maintainers User avatar brockfanning
Translation license MIT License
Translation process
  • Translations can be made directly.
  • Translation suggestions are turned off.
  • Translations are reviewed by dedicated reviewers.
  • Any authenticated user can contribute.
  • The translation uses monolingual files.
  • The translation base language can not be edited.
Source code repository https://github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Repository branch master
Last remote commit Merge pull request #553 from weblate/weblate-sdg-metadata-1-1-1a d3a3ca3e2bb
User avatar brockfanning authored 3 days ago
Last commit in Weblate Merge pull request #553 from weblate/weblate-sdg-metadata-1-1-1a d3a3ca3e2bb
User avatar brockfanning authored 3 days ago
Weblate repository https://hosted.weblate.org/git/sdg-metadata/1-1-1a/
File mask translations-metadata/*/17-15-1.yml
Monolingual base language file translations-metadata/en/17-15-1.yml
Translation file Download translations-metadata/ru/17-15-1.yml
Last change April 9, 2022, 1:55 a.m.
Last change made by None
Language Russian
Language code ru
Text direction Left to right
Number of speakers 193,498,207
Number of plurals 3
Plural type One/few/many
Plurals One 1, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, 101, …
Few 2, 3, 4, 22, 23, 24, 32, 33, 34, 42, …
Many 0, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, …
Plural formula n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2
5 days ago

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 32 2,139 17,035
Approved 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Waiting for review 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Translated 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Needs editing 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Read-only 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Failing checks 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 100% 32 100% 2,139 100% 17,035
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes
NovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Quick numbers

2,139
Hosted words
32
Hosted strings
0%
Translated
0
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

—
Hosted words
+100%
—
Hosted strings
+100%
—
Translated
—
—
Contributors
—
User avatar None

Resource updated
The “translations-metadata/en/17-15-1.yml” file was changed. 2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p><strong>URL:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://effectivecooperation.org/">http://effectivecooperation.org/</a></p>
<p>Internationally agreed methodology and guideline URL: https://www.effectivecooperation.org/system/files/2020-09/2018_Monitoring_Guide_National_Coordinator.pdf</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>Ocampo, Jose Antonio (2015). A Post-2015 Monitoring and Accountability Framework. UNDESA: CDP Background Paper No. 27. ST/ESA/2015/CDP/27.</p>
<p>Espey, Jessica; K. Walecik and M. K&#xFC;hner (2015). Follow-up and Review of the SDGs: Fulfilling our Commitments. Sustainable Development Solutions Network: A Global Initiative for the United Nations. New York: SDSN.</p>
<p>Coppard, D. and C. Culey (2015). The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation&#x2019;s Contribution to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Plenary Session 1 Background Paper. Busan Global Partnership Forum, Korea.</p>
<p>GPEDC (2018). 2018 Monitoring Guide. /Paris/New York. Available at: https://www.effectivecooperation.org/system/files/2020-09/2018_Monitoring_Guide_National_Coordinator.pdf</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>
<p>NA</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p><strong>Data availability:</strong></p>
<p>Data collected in the 2016 and 2018 monitoring round generated data for a total of 96 recipient countries and for above 100 development partners &#x2013;including the 29 countries that are members of the OECD&#x2019;s Development Assistance Committee and the six major multilateral organizations in terms of development finance (i.e. the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations Development Programme, African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank). </p>
<p><strong>Time series:</strong></p>
<p>Data for countries have been compiled in 2016 and 2018. From 2023, data will be available on a rolling basis with all countries encouraged to report at least once within a four-year cycle.</p>
<p><strong>Disaggregation:</strong></p>
<p>Given the bottom-up approach in generating the indicator, disaggregation is possible at the country level and at the development partner level.</p>
<p>While data collection is led at the country level, in a bottom-up approach, global and regional aggregates can be used for monitoring internationally-agreed commitments related to strengthening country ownership and better partner alignment with nationally-set development goals. </p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>Not applicable</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>To provide a comprehensive measure on the extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and other government-led planning tools, the indicator calculates the degree to which objectives, results, indicators and monitoring frameworks associated with new development interventions are drawn from government sources &#x2013; including national, sector and subnational planning tools.</p>
<p>For each development intervention of significant size (US$ 100,000 and above) approved during the year of reference, the following dimensions are assessed:</p>
<ul>
<li>Q1. Whether objectives are drawn from country-owned results frameworks, plans and strategies 0/1</li>
<li>Q2. Share of results (outcome) indicators that are drawn from country-owned results frameworks, plans and strategies %</li>
<li>Q3. Share of results (outcome) indicators that will rely on sources of data provided by existing country-led monitoring systems or national statistical services to track project progress %</li>
</ul>
<p>Global aggregates for the indicator (for partner countries and providers) are obtained by averaging the three dimensions of alignment with country&#x2019;s priorities and goals across all new interventions for the reporting year. </p>
<p>Aggregated averages per partner country will provide the extent to which CRFs and planning tools are used by providers of development co-operation operating in that specific country in the design and monitoring of new development projects. </p>
<p>All formulas are available at: <a href="http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/metadata-compilation/Metadata-Goal-17.pdf">http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/metadata-compilation/Metadata-Goal-17.pdf</a></p>
<p>Aggregated averages per development partner will indicate the extent to which that development partner uses CRFs and planning tools in the design and monitoring of new development projects in countries in which it operates. Formulas are available at: <a href="http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/metadata-compilation/Metadata-Goal-17.pdf">http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/metadata-compilation/Metadata-Goal-17.pdf</a></p>
<p>When aggregating, the size (budget amount) of the project/ intervention is not considered as weight in order to give the same level of importance to the extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and planning tools in medium-sized vs. larger projects, as the indicator tries to capture the overall behaviour of development partners in designing new interventions in a given country. Weighting by project size would otherwise overrepresent infrastructure projects and underrepresent interventions focused on influencing policies and institutional arrangements. Nevertheless, data on project size is available.</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>The Global Partnership monitoring exercise collects data beyond the scope of the proposed indicator, including additional aspects such as quality of national development planning, the enabling environment of civil society organisations, the quality of public-private dialogue, the predictability of development co-operation, and the use of country public financial management systems by providers of development co-operation. Data generated from the Global Partnership monitoring provide evidence for two additional SDG indicators: 17.16.1 and 5.c.1. </p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) jointly compile and report the data at the global level.</p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>The data collection calendar was on a biennial cycle prior to 2020. Data has been reported based on the data collected in 2016 and 2018. The next monitoring round will take place starting from 2023 with data collection occurring on a rolling basis. </p>
 
2 years ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository
<p>(i) For the data collection process of the Global Partnership&apos;s monitoring exercise, a national coordinator is assigned by the country government. S/he typically comes from the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Planning, or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a Ministry that has a role for managing development cooperation and partnerships in accordance with the respective institutional structure of each country. </p>
<p>(ii) The national coordinator collects inputs from development partners. The data is submitted to the OECD and UNDP and subsequently undergoes a review round with the headquarters offices of development partners. </p>
<p>(iii) No adjustments are made to the data after they have undergone the validation process. However, inconsistencies or possible problematic values are highlighted and sent back to national coordinators for revision.</p>
 
2 years ago
Browse all translation changes