Translation status

32 Strings 12%
Browse Translate
3,896 Words 1%
29,863 Characters 1%

Strings status

Strings Words Characters
32 3,896 29,863
All strings Browse Translate Zen
4 8 84
Translated strings Browse Translate Zen
4 8 84
Strings waiting for review Browse Translate Zen
28 3,888 29,779
Unfinished strings Browse Translate Zen
26 3,764 28,884
Untranslated strings Browse Translate Zen
2 124 895
Strings marked for edit Browse Translate Zen
28 3,888 29,779
Unfinished strings without suggestions Browse Translate Zen

Overview

Project website github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Instructions for translators

This project is limited to Russian translation only, for now.

More detailed instructions to come.
Project maintainers User avatar brockfanning
Translation license MIT License
Translation process
  • Translations can be made directly.
  • Translation suggestions are turned off.
  • Translations are reviewed by dedicated reviewers.
  • Any authenticated user can contribute.
  • The translation uses monolingual files.
  • The translation base language can not be edited.
Source code repository https://github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Repository branch master
Last remote commit Merge pull request #542 from weblate/weblate-sdg-metadata-1-1-1a 85d59a4a6e9
User avatar brockfanning authored 2 weeks ago
Last commit in Weblate Translated using Weblate (French) 4e2543f0d65
User avatar deblsyl authored a year ago
Weblate repository https://hosted.weblate.org/git/sdg-metadata/1-1-1a/
File mask translations-metadata/*/15-8-1.yml
Monolingual base language file translations-metadata/en/15-8-1.yml
Translation file Download translations-metadata/fr/15-8-1.yml
Last change Feb. 7, 2023, 8:10 p.m.
Last author None
5 days ago

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 32 3,896 29,863
Approved 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Waiting for review 12% 4 1% 8 1% 84
Translated 12% 4 1% 8 1% 84
Needs editing 6% 2 3% 124 2% 895
Read-only 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Failing checks 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 81% 26 96% 3,764 96% 28,884
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

2 changes 0 changes 2 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 22 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

Quick numbers

3,896
Hosted words
32
Hosted strings
12%
Translated
0
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

—
Hosted words
+100%
—
Hosted strings
+100%
—
Translated
+12%
—
Contributors
—
User avatar None

Resource updated

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
The “translations-metadata/en/15-8-1.yml” file was changed. a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>Biodiversity Indicators Partnership. (2017). Legislation for prevention and control of invasive alien species (IAS), encompassing &#x201C;Trends in policy responses, legislation and management plans to control and prevent spread of invasive alien species&#x201D; and &#x201C;Proportion of countries adopting relevant national legislation and adequately resourcing the prevention or control of invasive alien species&#x201D;. Retrieved from <a href="https://www.bipindicators.net/indicators/adoption-of-national-legislation-relevant-to-the-prevention-or-control-of-invasive-alien-species">https://www.bipindicators.net/indicators/adoption-of-national-legislation-relevant-to-the-prevention-or-control-of-invasive-alien-species</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>McGeoch, M.A., Butchart, S.H.M., Spear, D., Marais, E., Kleynhans, E.J., Symes, A., Chanson, J. &amp; Hoffmann, M. (2010) Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 95-108.</p>
<p>Tittensor, D. P., M. Walpole, S. L. L. Hill, D. G. Boyce, G. L. Britten, N. D. Burgess, S. H. M. Butchart, P. W. Leadley, E. C. Regan, R. Alkemade, R. Baumung, C. Bellard, L. Bouwman, N. J. Bowles-Newark, A. M. Chenery, W. W. L. Cheung, V. Christensen, H. D. Cooper, A. R. Crowther, M. J. R. Dixon, A. Galli, V. Gaveau, R. D. Gregory, N. L. Gutierrez, T. L. Hirsch, R. Hoeft, S. R. Januchowski-Hartley, M. Karmann, C. B. Krug, F. J. Leverington, J. Loh, R. K. Lojenga, K. Malsch, A. Marques, D. H. W. Morgan, P. J. Mumby, T. Newbold, K. Noonan-Mooney, S. N. Pagad, B. C. Parks, H. M. Pereira, T. Robertson, C. Rondinini, L. Santini, J. P. W. Scharlemann, S. Schindler, U. R. Sumaila, L. S. L. Teh, J. van Kolck, P. Visconti, and Y. Ye. 2014. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346, 241-244.</p>
<p>Turbelin, A. J., Malamud, B. D., &amp; Francis, R. A. (2017). Mapping the global state of invasive alien species: Patterns of invasion and policy responses. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26(1), 78&#x2013;92.</p>
 
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p><strong>Data sources and data collection:</strong></p>
<p>Two datasets were updated/developed for the measurement of this indicator.</p>
<p>Part (1) (a) </p>
<p>National Legislation considered relevant to the prevention of introduction of invasive alien species and control (used for &#x201C;National strategies for preventing and controlling invasive alien species&#x201D;). The data format is a spreadsheet of countries vs inclusion of invasive alien species in legislation, with year of legislation in each cell. Key information sources included ECOLEX (<a href="https://www.ecolex.org/">https://www.ecolex.org/</a>), FAOLEX (<a href="http://www.fao.org/faolex/en/">http://www.fao.org/faolex/en/</a>) and national government websites with information on Legislation. Country experts were also contacted for clarifications.</p>
<p>Part (1)(b) National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan of Biodiversity Conservation 2011-2020 and status of implementation of targets as described in the 5th National reports (used for &#x201C;National strategies for preventing and controlling invasive alien species&#x201D;). The information source was the CBD website, which features country profiles (<a href="https://www.cbd.int/countries/">https://www.cbd.int/countries/</a>). 196 countries were included. The data format is a spreadsheet of countries vs inclusion of IAS in NBSAP, and Aichi Target 9 alignment.</p>
<p>Part (2) Results of online survey, disseminated to all CBD national focal points, on Policy responses, mandate, legal authority and resourcing to manage the threat of invasive alien species (used for &#x201C;National legislation and policy relevant to invasive alien species&#x201D; and &#x201C;National allocation of resources towards the prevention or control of invasive alien species&#x201D;). The data format is a spreadsheet of countries vs each of nine IAS management related themes, for both mandate and legal authority; and with an additional dataset indicating funding received from global funding mechanisms for invasive alien species related projects.</p>
<p><strong>Disaggregation:</strong></p>
<p>196 countries that are party to the CBD. All datasets developed for the measurement of this indicator used the country name as the qualifier. Datasets can be aggregated regionally if desired.</p>
 
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>The indicator is managed under the IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group, of which the Chair is appointed by the Chair of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, elected every four years by the IUCN Membership of governments and civil society. The Invasive Species Specialist Group undertakes ongoing evaluation of fitness for use of the indicator i.e. the degree to which it meets user&#x2019;s requirements. This encompasses, inter alia, considerations of relevance, accuracy, timeliness, consistency, comprehensiveness, and accessibility.</p>
<p>Sans objet</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

Source string changed

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>Not applicableThe indicator is managed under the IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group, of which the Chair is appointed by the Chair of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, elected every four years by the IUCN Membership of governments and civil society. The Invasive Species Specialist Group undertakes ongoing evaluation of fitness for use of the indicator i.e. the degree to which it meets user&#x2019;s requirements. This encompasses, inter alia, considerations of relevance, accuracy, timeliness, consistency, comprehensiveness, and accessibility.</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>The national questionnaire circulated to national agencies (NSOs; and relevant national agencies eg Ministries of Environment or similar) is supported by clear definitions and guidance to support documentation of the YES/NO answers to each question. The IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group also provides case-by-case response to queries. </p>
<p>Sans objet</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

Source string changed

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>Not applicableThe national questionnaire circulated to national agencies (NSOs; and relevant national agencies eg Ministries of Environment or similar) is supported by clear definitions and guidance to support documentation of the YES/NO answers to each question. The IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group also provides case-by-case response to queries. </p>
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>This indicator is calculated from data derived from two annually updated datasets.</p>
<p>(1) (a) National Legislation considered relevant to the prevention of introduction of invasive alien species and control. </p>
<p>All countries currently party to the Convention on Biological Diversity were considered in the analysis (n = 195), excluding the European Union as an entity. Data for five countries were not comparable and were not included.</p>
<p>This indicator analysed national legislation relevant to IAS. Across countries, IAS relevant policies are found in legislations, regulations and acts related to the Environment, Forestry, Plant health, Animal health, Fisheries, Water, Species including Wild Fauna and Flora and Genetically Modified Organism (GMO). Most countries adopt a sectoral approach to IAS management. A few have adopted a more focused approach- one example is the 2014 Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species.</p>
<p>The 2010 and 2016 data considered national legislation related to invasive alien species in an overall perspective. The 2020 update included thematic sectors. To quantify adoption of IAS relevant policies, seven national legislation sectors were considered; animal health, plant health, environment (including protected areas and wildlife protection), biosecurity, fisheries and aquaculture (including wetlands and marine legislation), invasive alien species, and others (including hunting well as policy on particular species, such as the Giant African Snail, <em>Achatina fulica</em>). Examples of national legislation focused on IAS specifically were noted. </p>
<p>(1) (b) National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.</p>
<p>All countries currently party to the Convention on Biological Diversity were considered in the analysis (n = 195), excluding the European Union as an entity. This indicator measured whether countries firstly had targets related to IAS management in their NBSAPS, and secondly, whether these targets were aligned to Aichi Biodiversity Target 9.</p>
<p>NBSAPs are a key policy instrument that reflect, how national biodiversity strategies intend to fulfil the obligations of the CBD, and how the related action plans outline the steps to be taken to meet these goals. All parties to the CBD are obligated to revise their NBSAPs to reflect compliance with the revised Strategic Plan and Aichi Targets.</p>
<p>Part (1a) and (1b) were calculated as follows:</p>
<p>National strategies for preventing and controlling invasive alien species, underpinned by national policy and legislation for effective management of biological invasions. </p>
<p>The components of this sub-indicator are calculated as the number of countries with (a) national legislation and policy relevant to Invasive alien species concerns; and (b) national strategies for preventing and controlling invasive alien species, each divided by the total number of countries (196 to date) for which data are available. The first data point for component (1) (a) of this sub-indicator is 2010; the first data point for component (1)(b) is 2016.</p>
<p>Both Part 1a and Part 1b are incorporated in the SDG Database as ER_IAS_LEGIS and ER_IAS_NBSAP respectively. Regional and global series are also incorporated for the latter, as ER_IAS_NBSAPP.</p>
<p>Part (2) Indicator: The translation of policy arrangements into action by countries to implement policy and actively prevent and control invasive alien species and the resourcing of this action.</p>
<p>(2) Online survey on Policy responses, mandate, legal authority, and resourcing to manage the threat of invasive alien species.</p>
<p>An online survey was developed and submitted to all listed NSOs, CBD National focal points (in cases of absence of NSOs or lack of response) to obtain an insight into the allocation of resources to the management of invasive alien species. 142 of the 196 countries completed the survey. Considering the difficulty in obtaining information on the level of national investment on invasive alien species issues, proxy indicators were used to measure the allocation of resources by individual countries, such as &#x201C;does the country have a dedicated and staffed program for invasive alien species management&#x201D;. </p>
<p>This sub-indicator is calculated as the number of national respondents to the annual survey on invasive alien species response financing reporting availability of sufficient resources, divided by the total number of countries (142 to date) for which data are available. The first data point for this sub-indicator is 2016. Part 2 encompasses 18 specific components obtained from the following questions used in the annual survey on invasive alien species, as follows:</p>
<p>Does your country have a Government Department, National agency or agencies (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) responsible for managing IAS that impact the natural environment, economic sectors (e.g. agriculture, forestry, tourism, etc.) or human health? </p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to develop national plans and policies in relation to invasive alien species?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to undertake risk analyses of potentially invasive species?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to prevent the intentional introduction of species assessed as potentially invasive (including importation for the purposes of agriculture, aquaculture, the nursery trade, farming and animal breeding, the pet trade etc.)?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to minimise the unintentional introduction of alien species?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to promote public awareness of IAS issues?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to monitor and conduct surveillance programmes to detect founder populations of IAS at an early stage?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to contain and eradicate populations of IAS within the country?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to record and maintain information on IAS?</p>
<p>Are there institutions (including supranational institutions/organizations, e.g. EU) with a clear legal mandate and the necessary powers to enforce the relevant legal provisions regarding the control of IAS?</p>
<p>Are there any existing legal provisions or institutional arrangements to facilitate cooperation between different government agencies in making decisions regarding IAS?</p>
<p>Does your country have an allocation from the National budget to manage the threat of IAS?</p>
<p>If your country is a recipient of global funding (such as the Global Environment Facility (GEF) - has your country accessed any funding from global financial mechanisms for projects related to IAS management? </p>
<p>Does your Biodiversity Strategy (at the local, national, regional, or supranational level) include objective(s) and actions related to IAS management?</p>
<p>Is there a budget allocation or are there any financial tools (for e.g. dedicated financial programmes) available for this implementation?</p>
<p>Has your country developed a National Invasive Alien Species Strategy and Action Plan (NISSAP)?</p>
<p>Is there a budget allocation or are there any financial tools (for e.g. dedicated financial programmes) available for this implementation?</p>
<p>Do you know of any non-governmental agencies (NGO) or civil society groups involved in IAS management in your country?</p>
<p>Two of these, national budget allocations and recipients of global funding, are incorporated in the SDG Database as ER_IAS_NATBUD and ER_IAS_GLOFUN respectively. Regional and global series are also incorporated for each, as ER_IAS_NATBUDP and ER_IAS_GLOFUNP respectively.</p>
 
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>The adoption of legislation does not necessarily indicate the existence of regulations or policy to implement the legislation or how successful such implementation has been on the ground. There remains a need for further indicator development to make this link clearer. Legislation does not necessarily capture all efforts against invasive alien species that are happening at the national level.</p>
<p>Allocation of resources to facilitate the implementation of IAS management action is difficult to measure, particularly in a way that is comparable across countries. Proxies used to measure allocation of resources included- allocation of a budget line to invasive species management activities (including prevention, rapid response, and active management); appointed staff to carry out any IAS related activities; active programmes/projects etc.</p>
<p>Comments on the feasibility, suitability, relevance and limitations of the indicator. Also includes data comparability issues, presence of wide confidence intervals (such as for maternal mortality ratios); provides further details on additional non-official indicators commonly used together with the indicator.</p>
 
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 15-8-1
  3. French
<p>Aichi Biodiversity Target 9 states: &#x201C;By 2020, invasive alien species and pathways are identified and prioritized, priority species are controlled or eradicated, and measures are in place to manage pathways to prevent their introduction and establishment&#x201D;.</p>
<p>Under sub-indicator (1)(a), Effective national policy and legislation underpins effective national strategies and action for preventing and controlling invasive alien species. </p>
<p>Measurement of sub-indicator (1) (a) was first undertaken in 2010, and published in Butchart et al. (2010), CBD (2014), McGeoch et al. (2010), and Tittensor et al. (2014). Sub-indicator (1) indicators have now also been added to include (b) national commitment (mandate and legal authority) to key invasive alien species related themes, specifically if targets and objectives within national strategies for preventing and controlling invasive alien species are aligned with Aichi Target 9. </p>
<p>The indicator now also addresses (2) resourcing by national governments for the prevention and control of invasive alien species, as identified by the Sustainable Development Goals indicator 15.8.1 (&#x201C;Proportion of countries adopting relevant national legislation and adequately resourcing the prevention or control of invasive alien species&#x201D;). Adequate resourcing is vital to ensure implementation and effective delivery of targets set.</p>
 
a year ago
Browse all translation changes