Debian Handbook/05_packaging-system — Swedish @ Hosted Weblate: In a list of conditions to be met, the comma …

Translation

Source change

In a list of conditions to be met, the comma serves as a separator. It must be interpreted as a logical “and”. In conditions, the vertical bar (“|”) expresses a logical “or” (it is an inclusive “or”, not an exclusive “either/or”). Carrying greater priority than “and”, it can be used as many times as necessary. Thus, the dependency “(A or B) and C” is written <command>A | B, C</command>. In contrast, the expression “A or (B and C)” should be written as “(A or B) and (A or C)”, since the <literal>Depends</literal> field does not tolerate parentheses that change the order of priorities between the logical operators “or” and “and”. It would thus be written <command>A | B, A | C</command>. <ulink type="block" url="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/~~#document-ch~~ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields" />

English

In a list of conditions to be met, the comma serves as a separator. It must be interpreted as a logical “and”. In conditions, the vertical bar (“|”) expresses a logical “or” (it is an inclusive “or”, not an exclusive “either/or”). Carrying greater priority than “and”, it can be used as many times as necessary. Thus, the dependency “(A or B) and C” is written <command>A | B, C</command>. In contrast, the expression “A or (B and C)” should be written as “(A or B) and (A or C)”, since the <literal>Depends</literal> field does not tolerate parentheses that change the order of priorities between the logical operators “or” and “and”. It would thus be written <command>A | B, A | C</command>. <ulink type="block" url="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields" />

Swedish

Needs editing

Skip

	English	Swedish	Actions
	<command><<</command>: less than;	<command><<</command>: mindre än;
	<command><=</command>: less than or equal to;	<command><=</command>: mindre än eller lika med;
	<command>=</command>: equal to (note that “<literal>2.6.1</literal>” is not equal to “<literal>2.6.1-1</literal>”);	<command>=</command>: lika med (notera att exempelvis "<literal>2.6.1</literal>" inte är lika med "<literal>2.6.1-1</literal>");
	<command>>=</command>: greater than or equal to;	<command>>=</command>: större eller lika med;
	<command>>></command>: greater than.	<command>>></command>: större än.
	In a list of conditions to be met, the comma serves as a separator. It must be interpreted as a logical “and”. In conditions, the vertical bar (“\|”) expresses a logical “or” (it is an inclusive “or”, not an exclusive “either/or”). Carrying greater priority than “and”, it can be used as many times as necessary. Thus, the dependency “(A or B) and C” is written <command>A \| B, C</command>. In contrast, the expression “A or (B and C)” should be written as “(A or B) and (A or C)”, since the <literal>Depends</literal> field does not tolerate parentheses that change the order of priorities between the logical operators “or” and “and”. It would thus be written <command>A \| B, A \| C</command>. <ulink type="block" url="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields" />	I en lista av krav som skall uppfyllas används kommatecknet som en separator. Det måste tolkas som ett logiskt "och". I krav uttrycker ett vertikalt streck ("\|") ett logiskt "eller" (ett inkluderande "eller", inte ett exkluderande "antingen/eller"). Den innehar större prioritet än "och" och kan användas så många gånger som krävs. Därav skrivs beroendet "(A eller B) och C" som <command>A \| B, C</command>. Som kontrast behöver uttrycket "A eller (B och C)" skrivas som "(A eller B) och (A eller C)", eftersom <literal>Beror på</literal>-fältet inte tolererar parenteser som ändrar prioritetsordningen mellan de logiska operanderna "eller" och "och". Det skall således skrivas <command>A \| B, A \| C</command>. <ulink type="block" url="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#document-ch-relationships" />
	<primary>meta-package</primary>	<primary>meta-paket</primary>
	The dependencies system is a good mechanism for guaranteeing the operation of a program, but it has another use with “meta-packages”. These are empty packages that only describe dependencies. They facilitate the installation of a consistent group of programs pre-selected by the meta-package maintainer; as such, <command>apt install <replaceable>meta-package</replaceable></command> will automatically install all of these programs using the meta-package's dependencies. The <emphasis role="pkg">gnome</emphasis>, <emphasis role="pkg">kde-full</emphasis> and <emphasis role="pkg">linux-image-amd64</emphasis> packages are examples of meta-packages.	Systemet med beroenden är en bra mekanism för att säkerställa ett programs funktion, men det har en annan funktion när det kommer till "metapaket". Detta är tomma paket som enbart beskriver beroenden. Dessa underlättar installationen av en sammanhängande grupp av program förvald av underhållaren av metapaketet; som sådan kommer <command>apt install <replaceable>metapaketet</replaceable></command> automatiskt installera alla dessa program genom metapaketets beroenden. Paketen <emphasis role="pkg">gnome</emphasis>, <emphasis role="pkg">kde-full</emphasis> och <emphasis role="pkg">linux-image-amd64</emphasis> är exempel på metapaket.
	<emphasis>DEBIAN POLICY</emphasis> <literal>Recommends</literal>, <literal>Suggests</literal>, and <literal>Enhances</literal> fields	<emphasis>DEBIAN RIKTLINJER</emphasis> Fälten <literal>Recommends</literal>, <literal>Suggests</literal> och <literal>Enhances</literal>
	<primary>package</primary><secondary>recommendations</secondary>	<primary>paket</primary><secondary>rekommendationer</secondary>
	<primary>package</primary><secondary>suggestions</secondary>	<primary>paket</primary><secondary>förslag</secondary>

Loading…

None

String updated in the repository

English

In a list of conditions to be met, the comma serves as a separator. It must be interpreted as a logical “and”. In conditions, the vertical bar (“|”) expresses a logical “or” (it is an inclusive “or”, not an exclusive “either/or”). Carrying greater priority than “and”, it can be used as many times as necessary. Thus, the dependency “(A or B) and C” is written <command>A | B, C</command>. In contrast, the expression “A or (B and C)” should be written as “(A or B) and (A or C)”, since the <literal>Depends</literal> field does not tolerate parentheses that change the order of priorities between the logical operators “or” and “and”. It would thus be written <command>A | B, A | C</command>. <ulink type="block" url="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields" />

Swedish 807 characters edited Current translation Needs editing

I en lista av krav som skall uppfyllas används kommatecknet som en separator. Det måste tolkas som ett logiskt "och". I krav uttrycker ett vertikalt streck ("|") ett logiskt "eller" (ett inkluderande "eller", inte ett exkluderande "antingen/eller"). Den innehar större prioritet än "och" och kan användas så många gånger som krävs. Därav skrivs beroendet "(A eller B) och C" som <command>A | B, C</command>. Som kontrast behöver uttrycket "A eller (B och C)" skrivas som "(A eller B) och (A eller C)", eftersom <literal>Beror på</literal>-fältet inte tolererar parenteser som ändrar prioritetsordningen mellan de logiska operanderna "eller" och "och". Det skall således skrivas <command>A | B, A | C</command>. <ulink type="block" url="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#document-ch-relationships" />

a year ago

None

Source string changed

English 32 characters edited

a year ago

Browse all string changes

Things to check

Consecutive duplicated words

Text contains the same word twice in a row: och

Reset

Glossary

English	Swedish
No related strings found in the glossary.

String information

Flags

xml-text

String age

a year ago

Last updated

11 months ago

Source string age

a year ago

Translation file

sv-SE/05_packaging-system.po, string 80