Changes
Translation components API.
See the Weblate's Web API documentation for detailed description of the API.
GET /api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/changes/?format=api
{ "count": 498, "next": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/changes/?format=api&page=2", "previous": null, "results": [ { "unit": null, "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": null, "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2024-02-08T04:19:13.836121+01:00", "action": 47, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "alert": "UnusedComponent" }, "id": 80531294, "action_name": "Alert triggered", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/80531294/?format=api" }, { "unit": null, "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.200524+01:00", "action": 0, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "reason": "content changed", "filename": "translations-metadata/en/15-4-1.yml" }, "id": 47684803, "action_name": "Resource updated", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684803/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679682/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.200323+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h1> Ссылки </h1>\n<h2> URL: </h2>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.unep-wcmc.org/\">http://www.unep-wcmc.org/</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/\">http://www.birdlife.org/</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.iucn.org/\">http://www.iucn.org/</a></p>\n<h2>Ссылки:</h2>\n<p>Эти метаданные основаны на <a href=\"http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx\">http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx</a>, дополненных <a href=\"http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays\">http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays</a> и на ссылках, перечисленных ниже.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Доступно на <a href=\"http://datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.\">datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA</a>.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) <em>World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas.</em>Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Доступно на <a href=\"http://keybiodiversityareas.org/site/search\">http://keybiodiversityareas.org/site/search</a>.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3–12. Доступно на <a href=\"http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329%23.VafbVJPVq75\">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75</a>.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497–522 in Durán y Lalaguna, P., Díaz Barrado, C.M. & Fernández Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Доступно из: <a href=\"https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456\">https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</a></p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short\">http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short</a>.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Доступно из <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529</a></p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329–337. Доступно из <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full</a></p>\n<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Доступно на <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/\">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a></p>\n<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443–445. Доступно на <a href=\"http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.shor\">http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.shor</a></p>\n<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Доступно из <a href=\"http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322\">http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322</a></p>\n<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392–402. Доступно из <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract</a>.</p>\n<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177–198.</p>\n<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Доступно из <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243</a></p>\n<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity Areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969–983. Доступно на <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract</a></p>\n<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110–1118. Доступно из <a href=\"http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short\">http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short</a></p>\n<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733–2744. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779\">http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779</a>.</p>\n<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from <a href=\"http://www.gadm.org/home\" target=\"_blank\">www.gadm.org</a>.</p>\n<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Доступно на <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046</a></p>\n<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167– Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298</a></p>\n<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Доступно из <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a></p>\n<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111–128. Доступно из <a href=\"http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf\">http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf</a></p>\n<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256–261. Доступно из <a href=\"http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short\">http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short</a></p>\n<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Доступно из <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055</a></p>\n<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698. Доступно из <a href=\"http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5#page-1\">http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5#page-1</a></p>\n<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383–386. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html\">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html</a></p>\n<p>NOLTE, C. & AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155–165. Доступно на <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract</a></p>\n<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda’s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133–138. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412</a></p>\n<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497–18501. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short\">http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short</a>.</p>\n<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html\">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html</a></p>\n<p>RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978–2983. Доступно на \n<a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454</a></p>\n<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241–244. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short\">http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short</a></p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Доступно из <a href=\"http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual\">http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual</a>.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC & IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net\">http://www.protectedplanet.net</a></p>", "old": "<h1> Ссылки </h1>\n<h2> URL: </h2>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.unep-wcmc.org/\">http://www.unep-wcmc.org/</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/\">http://www.birdlife.org/</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.iucn.org/\">http://www.iucn.org/</a></p>\n<h2>Ссылки:</h2>\n<p>Эти метаданные основаны на <a href=\"http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx\">http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx</a>, дополненных <a href=\"http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays\">http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays</a> и на ссылках, перечисленных ниже.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Доступно на <a href=\"http://datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.\">datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA</a>.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) <em>World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas.</em>Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Доступно на <a href=\"http://keybiodiversityareas.org/site/search\">http://keybiodiversityareas.org/site/search</a>.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3–12. Доступно на <a href=\"http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329%23.VafbVJPVq75\">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75</a>.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497–522 in Durán y Lalaguna, P., Díaz Barrado, C.M. & Fernández Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Доступно из: <a href=\"https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456\">https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</a></p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short\">http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short</a>.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Доступно из <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529</a></p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329–337. Доступно из <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full</a></p>\n<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Доступно на <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/\">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a></p>\n<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443–445. Доступно на <a href=\"http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.shor\">http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.shor</a></p>\n<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Доступно из <a href=\"http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322\">http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322</a></p>\n<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392–402. Доступно из <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract</a>.</p>\n<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177–198.</p>\n<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Доступно из <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243</a></p>\n<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity Areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969–983. Доступно на <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract</a></p>\n<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110–1118. Доступно из <a href=\"http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short\">http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short</a></p>\n<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733–2744. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779\">http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779</a>.</p>\n<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from <a href=\"http://www.gadm.org/home\" target=\"_blank\">www.gadm.org</a>.</p>\n<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Доступно на <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046</a></p>\n<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167– Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298</a></p>\n<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Доступно из <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a></p>\n<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111–128. Доступно из <a href=\"http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf\">http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf</a></p>\n<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256–261. Доступно из <a href=\"http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short\">http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short</a></p>\n<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Доступно из <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055</a></p>\n<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698. Доступно из <a href=\"http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5#page-1\">http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5#page-1</a></p>\n<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383–386. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html\">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html</a></p>\n<p>NOLTE, C. & AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155–165. Доступно на <a href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract\">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract</a></p>\n<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda’s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133–138. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412</a></p>\n<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497–18501. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short\">http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short</a>.</p>\n<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html\">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html</a></p>\n<p>RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978–2983. Доступно на \n<a href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454\">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454</a></p>\n<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241–244. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short\">http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short</a></p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Доступно из <a href=\"http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual\">http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual</a>.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC & IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Доступно из <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net\">http://www.protectedplanet.net</a></p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p><strong>URL:</strong></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.unep-wcmc.org/\">http://www.unep-wcmc.org/</a> ; <a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/\">http://www.birdlife.org/</a> ; <a href=\"http://www.iucn.org/\">http://www.iucn.org/</a> </p>\n<p><strong>References:</strong></p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Available at datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Available at http://keybiodiversityareas.org/sites/search.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3–12. Available </p>\n<p>from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497–522 in Durán y Lalaguna, P., Díaz Barrado, C.M. & Fernández Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Available from: https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168. Available from https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1187512.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329–337. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full.</p>\n<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/\">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a>.</p>\n<p>CBD (2018). Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. Decision 14/8 adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020a). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from https://www.cbd.int/gbo5/. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020b). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Scientific and technical information to support the review of the updated Goals and Targets, and related indicators and baselines. Document CBD/SBSTTA/24/3. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/705d/6b4b/a1a463c1b19392bde6fa08f3/sbstta-24-03-en.pdf.</p>\n<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443–445. Available from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.short.</p>\n<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322.</p>\n<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392–402. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract.</p>\n<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177–198.</p>\n<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243.</p>\n<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity Areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969–983. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract.</p>\n<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110–1118. Available from http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short.</p>\n<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733–2744. Available from </p>\n<p>https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779.</p>\n<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from www.gadm.org.</p>\n<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046.</p>\n<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167–179. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298.</p>\n<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259.</p>\n<p>IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.</p>\n<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111–128. Available from http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf.</p>\n<p>KBA Secretariat (2019). Key Biodiversity Areas Proposal Process: Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites. Version 1.0. Prepared by the KBA Secretariat and KBA Committee of the KBA Partnership. Cambridge, UK. Available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. </p>\n<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256–261. Available from </p>\n<p>http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short.</p>\n<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055.</p>\n<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698. Available from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-</p>\n<p>9564-5#page-1.</p>\n<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383–386. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html.</p>\n<p>NOLTE, C. & AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155–165. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract.</p>\n<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda’s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133–138. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412.</p>\n<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497–18501. Available from http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short.</p>\n<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html.</p>\n<p>RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978–2983. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454.</p>\n<p>SIMKINS, A.T., PEARMAIN, E.J., & DIAS, M.P. (2020). Code (and documentation) for calculating the protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas. <a href=\"https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap\">https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap</a>. </p>\n<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241–244. Available from https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1257484.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from <a href=\"http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual\">http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual</a>.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC & IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://www.protectedplanet.net.</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684802, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684802/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679682/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.200208+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p><strong>URL:</strong></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.unep-wcmc.org/\">http://www.unep-wcmc.org/</a> ; <a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/\">http://www.birdlife.org/</a> ; <a href=\"http://www.iucn.org/\">http://www.iucn.org/</a> </p>\n<p><strong>References:</strong></p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Available at datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Available at http://keybiodiversityareas.org/sites/search.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3–12. Available </p>\n<p>from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497–522 in Durán y Lalaguna, P., Díaz Barrado, C.M. & Fernández Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Available from: https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168. Available from https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1187512.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329–337. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full.</p>\n<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/\">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a>.</p>\n<p>CBD (2018). Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. Decision 14/8 adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020a). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from https://www.cbd.int/gbo5/. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020b). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Scientific and technical information to support the review of the updated Goals and Targets, and related indicators and baselines. Document CBD/SBSTTA/24/3. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/705d/6b4b/a1a463c1b19392bde6fa08f3/sbstta-24-03-en.pdf.</p>\n<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443–445. Available from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.short.</p>\n<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322.</p>\n<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392–402. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract.</p>\n<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177–198.</p>\n<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243.</p>\n<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity Areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969–983. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract.</p>\n<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110–1118. Available from http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short.</p>\n<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733–2744. Available from </p>\n<p>https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779.</p>\n<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from www.gadm.org.</p>\n<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046.</p>\n<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167–179. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298.</p>\n<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259.</p>\n<p>IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.</p>\n<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111–128. Available from http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf.</p>\n<p>KBA Secretariat (2019). Key Biodiversity Areas Proposal Process: Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites. Version 1.0. Prepared by the KBA Secretariat and KBA Committee of the KBA Partnership. Cambridge, UK. Available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. </p>\n<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256–261. Available from </p>\n<p>http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short.</p>\n<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055.</p>\n<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698. Available from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-</p>\n<p>9564-5#page-1.</p>\n<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383–386. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html.</p>\n<p>NOLTE, C. & AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155–165. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract.</p>\n<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda’s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133–138. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412.</p>\n<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497–18501. Available from http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short.</p>\n<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html.</p>\n<p>RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978–2983. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454.</p>\n<p>SIMKINS, A.T., PEARMAIN, E.J., & DIAS, M.P. (2020). Code (and documentation) for calculating the protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas. <a href=\"https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap\">https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap</a>. </p>\n<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241–244. Available from https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1257484.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from <a href=\"http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual\">http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual</a>.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC & IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://www.protectedplanet.net.</p>", "old": "<p><strong>URL:</strong></p>\n<p>http://www.unep-wcmc.org/; http://www.birdlife.org/; http://www.iucn.org/</p>\n<p><strong>References:</strong></p>\n<p>These metadata are based on http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-</p>\n<p>of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx, supplemented by http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays and the references listed below.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Available at datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas.Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Available at http://keybiodiversity areas.org/site/search.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3–12. Available </p>\n<p>from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497–522 in Durán y Lalaguna, P., Díaz Barrado, C.M. & Fernández Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Available from: https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168. Available from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329–337. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full.</p>\n<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/\">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a>.</p>\n<p>CBD (2018). Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. Decision 14/8 adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020a). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from https://www.cbd.int/gbo5/. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020b). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Scientific and technical information to support the review of the updated Goals and Targets, and related indicators and baselines. Document CBD/SBSTTA/24/3. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/705d/6b4b/a1a463c1b19392bde6fa08f3/sbstta-24-03-en.pdf.</p>\n<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443–445. Available from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.short.</p>\n<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322.</p>\n<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392–402. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract.</p>\n<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177–198.</p>\n<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243.</p>\n<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity Areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969–983. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract.</p>\n<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110–1118. Available from http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short.</p>\n<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733–2744. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779.</p>\n<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from www.gadm.org.</p>\n<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046.</p>\n<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167–179. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298.</p>\n<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259.</p>\n<p>IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.</p>\n<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111–128. Available from http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf.</p>\n<p>KBA Secretariat (2019). Key Biodiversity Areas Proposal Process: Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites. Version 1.0. Prepared by the KBA Secretariat and KBA Committee of the KBA Partnership. Cambridge, UK. Available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. </p>\n<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256–261. Available from </p>\n<p>http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short.</p>\n<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055.</p>\n<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698. Available from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-</p>\n<p>9564-5#page-1.</p>\n<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383–386. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html.</p>\n<p>NOLTE, C. & AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155–165. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract.</p>\n<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda’s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133–138. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412.</p>\n<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497–18501. Available from http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short.</p>\n<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html.</p>\n<p>RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978–2983. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454.</p>\n<p>SIMKINS, A.T., PEARMAIN, E.J., & DIAS, M.P. (2020). Code (and documentation) for calculating the protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas. <a href=\"https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap\">https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap</a>. </p>\n<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241–244. Available from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from <a href=\"http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual\">http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual</a>.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC & IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://www.protectedplanet.net.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684801, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684801/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679680/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.200078+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h2> Источники расхождений: </h2>\n<p>Национальные процессы обеспечивают основную часть данных, которые впоследствии агрегируются как во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям, так и во Всемирную базу данных по ключевым районам сохранения биоразнообразия, и поэтому между национальными показателями и глобальными показателями очень мало различий. Одним из незначительных различий является то, что Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям включает охраняемые территории, определенные на международном уровне (например, объекты всемирного наследия ЮНЕСКО, Рамсарские угодья и т. д.), но некоторые из них не считаются в их суверенных странах охраняемыми территориями. </p>\n<p>Обратите внимание, что, поскольку страны не предоставляют во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям полные данные по официально объявленным ликвидированными охраняемым территориям, более ранние значения показателя могут незначительно занижать охват. Кроме того, существует отставание между временем, когда произошло наделение полномочиями охраняемой территории на местности, и временем, когда об этом сообщается во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям. Таким образом, текущий или предшествующий охват также может быть занижен. </p>", "old": "<h2> Источники расхождений: </h2>\n<p>Национальные процессы обеспечивают основную часть данных, которые впоследствии агрегируются как во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям, так и во Всемирную базу данных по ключевым районам сохранения биоразнообразия, и поэтому между национальными показателями и глобальными показателями очень мало различий. Одним из незначительных различий является то, что Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям включает охраняемые территории, определенные на международном уровне (например, объекты всемирного наследия ЮНЕСКО, Рамсарские угодья и т. д.), но некоторые из них не считаются в их суверенных странах охраняемыми территориями. </p>\n<p>Обратите внимание, что, поскольку страны не предоставляют во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям полные данные по официально объявленным ликвидированными охраняемым территориям, более ранние значения показателя могут незначительно занижать охват. Кроме того, существует отставание между временем, когда произошло наделение полномочиями охраняемой территории на местности, и временем, когда об этом сообщается во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям. Таким образом, текущий или предшествующий охват также может быть занижен. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>\n<p>National processes provide the data that are incorporated into the WDPA, the WDOECM, and the World Database of KBAs, so there are very few discrepancies between national indicators and the global one. One minor source of difference is that the WDPA incorporates internationally-designated protected areas (e.g., UNESCO World Heritage sites, Ramsar sites, etc), a few of which are not considered by their sovereign nations to be protected areas. </p>\n<p>Note that because countries do not submit comprehensive data on degazetted protected areas to the WDPA, earlier values of the indictor may marginally underestimate coverage. Furthermore, there is also a lag between the point at which a protected area is designated on the ground and the point at which it is reported to the WDPA. As such, current or recent coverage may also be underestimated.</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684800, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684800/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679680/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199955+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>\n<p>National processes provide the data that are incorporated into the WDPA, the WDOECM, and the World Database of KBAs, so there are very few discrepancies between national indicators and the global one. One minor source of difference is that the WDPA incorporates internationally-designated protected areas (e.g., UNESCO World Heritage sites, Ramsar sites, etc), a few of which are not considered by their sovereign nations to be protected areas. </p>\n<p>Note that because countries do not submit comprehensive data on degazetted protected areas to the WDPA, earlier values of the indictor may marginally underestimate coverage. Furthermore, there is also a lag between the point at which a protected area is designated on the ground and the point at which it is reported to the WDPA. As such, current or recent coverage may also be underestimated.</p>", "old": "<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>\n<p>National processes provide the data that are incorporated into the World Database on Protected Areas, the World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures, and the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas, so there are very few discrepancies between national indicators and the global one. One minor source of difference is that the World Database on Protected Areas incorporates internationally-designated protected areas (e.g., UNESCO World Heritage sites, Ramsar sites, etc), a few of which are not considered by their sovereign nations to be protected areas. </p>\n<p>Note that because countries do not submit comprehensive data on degazetted protected areas to the WDPA, earlier values of the indictor may marginally underestimate coverage. Furthermore, there is also a lag between the point at which a protected area is designated on the ground and the point at which it is reported to the WDPA. As such, current or recent coverage may also be underestimated.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684799, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684799/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798211/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199842+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>High.</p>\n<p>Each custodian agency is responsible for quality management of their own database.<br>Quality assessment of the indicator is shared between the indicator custodian agencies.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684798, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684798/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679671/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199709+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h2> Обеспечение качества: </h2>\n<p> Процесс сбора, стандартизации и публикации данных доступен в Руководстве пользователя WDPA по адресу: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>, которое доступно на английском, французском и испанском языках. Конкретные инструкции представлены на <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas,</a>например, по предопределенным полям или поисковым таблицам в WDPA: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, как кодируются записи WDPA, как собираются данные о международных обозначениях и региональных обозначениях, как регулярно обновляется база данных и как составлять статистику охвата охраняемых территорий. </p>\n<p>Процесс определения ключевых территорий биоразнообразия поддерживается Партнерством по ключевым областям биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners</a>). Среди задач партнерства - создание Секретариата по ключевым областям биоразнообразия, который проверяет информацию, представленную на этапе номинации участков, на предмет правильного применения стандарта ключевых областей биоразнообразия (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>), а также на соответствие документации участка и затем проверяет участок, информация о котором затем публикуется на веб-сайте ключевых областей биоразнообразия. (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved</a>). Кроме того, председатели Комиссии по выживанию видов МСОП и Всемирной комиссии по охраняемым территориям (оба избираются членами МСОП, входящими в состав правительств и неправительственных организаций), назначают председателя независимого комитета по стандартам и апелляциям ключевых территорий биоразнообразия, который обеспечивает правильное применение Глобального стандарта для определения ключевых областей биоразнообразия. Код R для расчета охвата охраняемых территорий ключевых районов биоразнообразия задокументирован как Dias, M. (2017) “ код R для расчета охвата охраняемых территорий КРБ ” (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/userfiles/files/R_code_for_calculating_protected_area_coverage_of_KBAs_March_2017.pdf\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/userfiles/files/R_code_for_calculating_procted_procted_archive_archive_examples </a></p>\n<p>Помимо распространения через веб-сайт Защищенная планета (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>), процесс составления Списка ООН разъясняет в п. 3.1 тот факт, что данные по охраняемым территориям, собранные от национальных агентств, которые названы в метаданных Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям, и на веб-сайте ключевых территорий сохранения биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>), данные визуального интерфейса Защищенная планета и данные по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия, распространяются с помощью Инструмента интегрированной оценки биоразнообразия, доступного для исследования и сохранения в Интернете (<a href=\"https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/\">https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/</a>). Он включает документы странового профиля для всех стран мира, в котором содержится документация по показателю охвата охраняемых территорий ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия. Каждое ежегодное обновление этих страновых профилей направляется для консультаций национальным координаторам Конвенции о биологическом разнообразии (<a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml\">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), представителям национальных статистических управлений по ЦУР и представителям постоянных представительств ООН (Женева). </p>", "old": "<h2> Обеспечение качества: </h2>\n<p> Процесс сбора, стандартизации и публикации данных доступен в Руководстве пользователя WDPA по адресу: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>, которое доступно на английском, французском и испанском языках. Конкретные инструкции представлены на <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas,</a>например, по предопределенным полям или поисковым таблицам в WDPA: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, как кодируются записи WDPA, как собираются данные о международных обозначениях и региональных обозначениях, как регулярно обновляется база данных и как составлять статистику охвата охраняемых территорий. </p>\n<p>Процесс определения ключевых территорий биоразнообразия поддерживается Партнерством по ключевым областям биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners</a>). Среди задач партнерства - создание Секретариата по ключевым областям биоразнообразия, который проверяет информацию, представленную на этапе номинации участков, на предмет правильного применения стандарта ключевых областей биоразнообразия (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>), а также на соответствие документации участка и затем проверяет участок, информация о котором затем публикуется на веб-сайте ключевых областей биоразнообразия. (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved</a>). Кроме того, председатели Комиссии по выживанию видов МСОП и Всемирной комиссии по охраняемым территориям (оба избираются членами МСОП, входящими в состав правительств и неправительственных организаций), назначают председателя независимого комитета по стандартам и апелляциям ключевых территорий биоразнообразия, который обеспечивает правильное применение Глобального стандарта для определения ключевых областей биоразнообразия. Код R для расчета охвата охраняемых территорий ключевых районов биоразнообразия задокументирован как Dias, M. (2017) “ код R для расчета охвата охраняемых территорий КРБ ” (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/userfiles/files/R_code_for_calculating_protected_area_coverage_of_KBAs_March_2017.pdf\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/userfiles/files/R_code_for_calculating_procted_procted_archive_archive_examples </a></p>\n<p>Помимо распространения через веб-сайт Защищенная планета (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>), процесс составления Списка ООН разъясняет в п. 3.1 тот факт, что данные по охраняемым территориям, собранные от национальных агентств, которые названы в метаданных Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям, и на веб-сайте ключевых территорий сохранения биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>), данные визуального интерфейса Защищенная планета и данные по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия, распространяются с помощью Инструмента интегрированной оценки биоразнообразия, доступного для исследования и сохранения в Интернете (<a href=\"https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/\">https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/</a>). Он включает документы странового профиля для всех стран мира, в котором содержится документация по показателю охвата охраняемых территорий ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия. Каждое ежегодное обновление этих страновых профилей направляется для консультаций национальным координаторам Конвенции о биологическом разнообразии (<a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml\">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), представителям национальных статистических управлений по ЦУР и представителям постоянных представительств ООН (Женева). </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>Information on the process of how protected area data are collected, standardised and published is available in the WDPA User Manual at: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a> which is available in English, French and Spanish. Specific guidance is provided at <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a> on, for example, predefined fields or look up tables in the WDPA: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, how WDPA records are coded how international designations and regional designations data is collected, how regularly is the database updated, and how to perform protected areas coverage statistics. </p>\n<p>Data quality in the process of identifying KBAs is ensured through processes established by the <a href=\"https://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/programme/partnership\">KBA Partnership</a> and KBA Secretariat. Data quality is ensured through wide stakeholder engagement in the KBA proposal process, data checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominations by the KBA Secretariat. </p>\n<p>In addition, the Chairs of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and World Commission on Protected Areas (both of whom are elected by the IUCN Membership of governments and non-governmental organisations), appoint the Chair of an independent KBA Standards and Appeals Committee, which ensures the correct application of the Global Standard for the identification of KBA, and oversees a formal Procedure for handling of appeals against the identification of KBAs (see http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/1b388c918e14c5f4c3d7a0237eb0d366).</p>\n<p>Before submission to the UN SDG Indicators database the annually updated indicators of coverage of KBAs by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are incorporated into updated Country Profiles on the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (<a href=\"https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles\">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>) and then sent for consultation to National Focal Points of the Convention on Biological Diversity (<a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml\">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), National Statistics Offices SDG Representatives and UN Permanent Missions (Geneva) representatives. </p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684797, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684797/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679671/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199601+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>Information on the process of how protected area data are collected, standardised and published is available in the WDPA User Manual at: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a> which is available in English, French and Spanish. Specific guidance is provided at <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a> on, for example, predefined fields or look up tables in the WDPA: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, how WDPA records are coded how international designations and regional designations data is collected, how regularly is the database updated, and how to perform protected areas coverage statistics. </p>\n<p>Data quality in the process of identifying KBAs is ensured through processes established by the <a href=\"https://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/programme/partnership\">KBA Partnership</a> and KBA Secretariat. Data quality is ensured through wide stakeholder engagement in the KBA proposal process, data checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominations by the KBA Secretariat. </p>\n<p>In addition, the Chairs of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and World Commission on Protected Areas (both of whom are elected by the IUCN Membership of governments and non-governmental organisations), appoint the Chair of an independent KBA Standards and Appeals Committee, which ensures the correct application of the Global Standard for the identification of KBA, and oversees a formal Procedure for handling of appeals against the identification of KBAs (see http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/1b388c918e14c5f4c3d7a0237eb0d366).</p>\n<p>Before submission to the UN SDG Indicators database the annually updated indicators of coverage of KBAs by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are incorporated into updated Country Profiles on the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (<a href=\"https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles\">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>) and then sent for consultation to National Focal Points of the Convention on Biological Diversity (<a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml\">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), National Statistics Offices SDG Representatives and UN Permanent Missions (Geneva) representatives. </p>", "old": "<p>Information on the process of how protected area data are collected, standardised and published is available in the WDPA User Manual at: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a> which is available in English, French and Spanish. Specific guidance is provided at <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a> on, for example, predefined fields or look up tables in the WDPA: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, how WDPA records are coded how international designations and regional designations data is collected, how regularly is the database updated, and how to perform protected areas coverage statistics. </p>\n<p>Data quality in the process of identifying Key Biodiversity Areas is ensured through processes established by the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners</a>) and Key Biodiversity Areas Secretariat. Data quality is ensured through wide stakeholder engagement in the KBA proposal process, data checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominations by the Key Biodiversity Areas Secretariat. </p>\n<p>In addition, the Chairs of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and World Commission on Protected Areas (both of whom are elected by the IUCN Membership of governments and non-governmental organisations), appoint the Chair of an independent Key Biodiversity Areas Standards and Appeals Committee, which ensures the correct application of the Global Standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas, and oversees a formal Procedure for handling of appeals against the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (see http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/1b388c918e14c5f4c3d7a0237eb0d366).</p>\n<p>Before submission to the UN SDG Indicators database the annually updated indicators of coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are incorporated into updated Country Profiles on the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (<a href=\"https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles\">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>) and then sent for consultation to National Focal Points of the Convention on Biological Diversity (<a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml\">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), National Statistics Offices SDG Representatives and UN Permanent Missions (Geneva) representatives. </p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684796, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684796/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798210/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199483+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>For protected areas and OECMs, please see the section on validation. Ensuring the WDPA and WDOECM remain an accurate and true depiction of reality is a never-ending task; however, over time the quality of the data (e.g. the proportion of sites with defined boundaries) is increasing.</p>\n<p>For KBAs, see above and below, plus the guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs which is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. Data quality is ensured through wide stakeholder engagement in the KBA proposal process, data checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominations by the KBAs Secretariat. Furthermore, an independent KBA Standards and Appeals Committee ensures the correct application of the Global Standard for the identification of KBAs, and oversees a formal Procedure for handling of appeals against the identification of KBAs (see http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/1b388c918e14c5f4c3d7a0237eb0d366).</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684795, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684795/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679647/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199339+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h2> Доступные странам методы и руководства для составления данных на национальном уровне: </h2>\n<p>Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям (WDPA) берет свое начало с мандата ООН 1959 года, когда Экономический и Социальный Совет ООН в резолюции 713 (XXVIII) призвал составить Список национальных парков и эквивалентных заповедников. Более подробная информация доступна здесь: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\"> https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a>. Список охраняемых территорий ООН был опубликован в 1961/62, 1966/71, 1972 годах (приложение к изданию 1966/71), 1973, 1974, 1975, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1990, 1993, 1997, 2003, 2014 и 2018 годов, в результате чего была создана глобальная сеть национальных поставщиков данных для Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям (WDPA). Например, в 2014 году все национальные координационные центры Конвенции о биологическом разнообразии (CBD) и все национальные координационные центры Программы работы по Конвенции о биологическом разнообразии по охраняемым территориям (PoWPA) запрашивали данные для Списка ООН по охраняемым территориям 2014 года <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas-2014\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas-2014</a>). Таким образом, данные по охраняемым территориям собираются непосредственно от правительственных органов, региональных центров и других авторитетных источников в отсутствие государственного источника. Все отчеты имеют уникальный идентификатор метаданных (MetadataID), который связывает пространственную базу данных с исходной таблицей, в которой описаны все источники. Данные сопоставляются и приводятся в стандартизируемую форму в соответствии со стандартами данных WDPA и проходят процесс валидации с источником. Процесс сопоставления, валидации и публикации данных, а также протоколы и стандарты данных WDPA регулярно обновляются в Руководстве пользователя WDPA (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) доступном по адресу <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net\"> www.protectedplanet.net</a>, где все пространственные данные и исходная таблица также публикуются каждый месяц и могут быть выгружены. </p>\n<p> Процесс составления данных по сайтам, вносящим значительный вклад в сохранение биоразнообразия во всем мире (Ключевые территории сохранения биоразнообразия), задокументирован в Интернете (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>). В частности, (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/what-are-kbas\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/what-are-kbas</a>) процесс идентификации ключевой территории сохранения биоразнообразия — это очень всеохватный, консультативный и восходящий вертикально-интегрированный процесс. Хотя любой человек, располагающий соответствующими научными данными, может предложить организовать участок, который квалифицируется как ключевой район сохранения биоразнообразия, в процессе подачи заявки необходимы широкие консультации с заинтересованными сторонами на национальном уровне (как неправительственными, так и правительственными организациями). Определение ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия основывается на существующей сети ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия, в том числе тех, которые определены с помощью 120 национальных организаций Партнерства по защите птиц как ключевые территории сохранения орнитологического биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/worldwide/partnership/birdlife-partners\">http://www.birdlife.org/worldwide/partnership/birdlifepartners</a>), 93 национальными и международными организациями Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения (<a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html\">http://www.zeroextinction.org /partners.html</a>), а также в других ключевых областях сохранения биоразнообразия организациями гражданского общества при поддержке Фонда партнерства критических экосистем в разработке профилей экосистем, названных в каждом из перечисленных здесь профилей (<a href=\"http://www.cepf.net/resources/publications/Pages/ecosystem_profiles.aspx\">http://www.cepf.net/resources/publications/Pages/ecosystem_profiles.aspx</a>), с новым усилением и расширением данных, увеличивающих сеть этих участков. Любое предложение организации участка проходит независимую научную экспертизу. Затем следует официальная номинация участка с представлением полного пакета документации, соответствующей Стандартам по документации для ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия. Участки, подтвержденные секретариатом ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия в качестве ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия, затем появляются на веб-сайте ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>).</p>\n<p> Руководство пользователя Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) опубликованное на английском, испанском и французском языках, содержит рекомендации для стран по таким вопросам, как порядок представления данные по охраняемым территориям во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям, какие имеются преимущества при предоставлении таких данных, каковы стандарты данных и какие проверки качества выполняются. Мы также предоставляем краткое изложение наших методов расчета охвата охраняемых территорий для всех пользователей Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/calculating-protected-area-coverage\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/calculating-protected-area-coverage</a>. Глобальный стандарт определения ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>) содержит стандартные рекомендации, доступные странам в определении ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия, с дополнительными руководящими указаниями, доступными на веб-сайте ключевых областей биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home(</a>). В частности (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved</a>), основные этапы процесса определения ключевого района биоразнообразия следующие: </p>\n<ol>\n <li> представление заявлений о намерениях определить ключевую область биоразнообразия\nрегиональным координационным центрам; </li>\n <li> процесс разработки предложения, в ходе которого заявители собирают соответствующие\nданные и документацию и консультируются с национальными экспертами, включая организации, которые уже определили ключевые области биоразнообразия в стране, либо через национальные координационные группы по ключевым областям биоразнообразия, либо независимо; </li>\n <li> обзор предложенных ключевых областей биоразнообразия независимыми экспертами-рецензентами,\nпроверка точности информации в пределах их области знаний; и </li>\n <li> этап номинации участка, включающий представление всей соответствующей документации\nдля проверки Секретариатом ключевых территорий биоразнообразия (см. Раздел 3.3 ниже). </li> </ol>\n<p> После определения ключевого района сохранения биоразнообразия становится важным организация мониторинга его квалифицирующих характеристик и статуса сохранения. Авторы предложений, рецензенты и те, кто проводит мониторинг, могут присоединиться к Сообществу по ключевым областям сохранения биоразнообразия, чтобы обмениваться своим опытом, результатами тематических исследований и примерами передовой практики. </p>", "old": "<h2> Доступные странам методы и руководства для составления данных на национальном уровне: </h2>\n<p>Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям (WDPA) берет свое начало с мандата ООН 1959 года, когда Экономический и Социальный Совет ООН в резолюции 713 (XXVIII) призвал составить Список национальных парков и эквивалентных заповедников. Более подробная информация доступна здесь: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\"> https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a>. Список охраняемых территорий ООН был опубликован в 1961/62, 1966/71, 1972 годах (приложение к изданию 1966/71), 1973, 1974, 1975, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1990, 1993, 1997, 2003, 2014 и 2018 годов, в результате чего была создана глобальная сеть национальных поставщиков данных для Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям (WDPA). Например, в 2014 году все национальные координационные центры Конвенции о биологическом разнообразии (CBD) и все национальные координационные центры Программы работы по Конвенции о биологическом разнообразии по охраняемым территориям (PoWPA) запрашивали данные для Списка ООН по охраняемым территориям 2014 года <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas-2014\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas-2014</a>). Таким образом, данные по охраняемым территориям собираются непосредственно от правительственных органов, региональных центров и других авторитетных источников в отсутствие государственного источника. Все отчеты имеют уникальный идентификатор метаданных (MetadataID), который связывает пространственную базу данных с исходной таблицей, в которой описаны все источники. Данные сопоставляются и приводятся в стандартизируемую форму в соответствии со стандартами данных WDPA и проходят процесс валидации с источником. Процесс сопоставления, валидации и публикации данных, а также протоколы и стандарты данных WDPA регулярно обновляются в Руководстве пользователя WDPA (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) доступном по адресу <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net\"> www.protectedplanet.net</a>, где все пространственные данные и исходная таблица также публикуются каждый месяц и могут быть выгружены. </p>\n<p> Процесс составления данных по сайтам, вносящим значительный вклад в сохранение биоразнообразия во всем мире (Ключевые территории сохранения биоразнообразия), задокументирован в Интернете (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>). В частности, (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/what-are-kbas\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/what-are-kbas</a>) процесс идентификации ключевой территории сохранения биоразнообразия — это очень всеохватный, консультативный и восходящий вертикально-интегрированный процесс. Хотя любой человек, располагающий соответствующими научными данными, может предложить организовать участок, который квалифицируется как ключевой район сохранения биоразнообразия, в процессе подачи заявки необходимы широкие консультации с заинтересованными сторонами на национальном уровне (как неправительственными, так и правительственными организациями). Определение ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия основывается на существующей сети ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия, в том числе тех, которые определены с помощью 120 национальных организаций Партнерства по защите птиц как ключевые территории сохранения орнитологического биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/worldwide/partnership/birdlife-partners\">http://www.birdlife.org/worldwide/partnership/birdlifepartners</a>), 93 национальными и международными организациями Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения (<a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html\">http://www.zeroextinction.org /partners.html</a>), а также в других ключевых областях сохранения биоразнообразия организациями гражданского общества при поддержке Фонда партнерства критических экосистем в разработке профилей экосистем, названных в каждом из перечисленных здесь профилей (<a href=\"http://www.cepf.net/resources/publications/Pages/ecosystem_profiles.aspx\">http://www.cepf.net/resources/publications/Pages/ecosystem_profiles.aspx</a>), с новым усилением и расширением данных, увеличивающих сеть этих участков. Любое предложение организации участка проходит независимую научную экспертизу. Затем следует официальная номинация участка с представлением полного пакета документации, соответствующей Стандартам по документации для ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия. Участки, подтвержденные секретариатом ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия в качестве ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия, затем появляются на веб-сайте ключевых районов сохранения биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>).</p>\n<p> Руководство пользователя Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) опубликованное на английском, испанском и французском языках, содержит рекомендации для стран по таким вопросам, как порядок представления данные по охраняемым территориям во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям, какие имеются преимущества при предоставлении таких данных, каковы стандарты данных и какие проверки качества выполняются. Мы также предоставляем краткое изложение наших методов расчета охвата охраняемых территорий для всех пользователей Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/calculating-protected-area-coverage\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/calculating-protected-area-coverage</a>. Глобальный стандарт определения ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>) содержит стандартные рекомендации, доступные странам в определении ключевых областей сохранения биоразнообразия, с дополнительными руководящими указаниями, доступными на веб-сайте ключевых областей биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home(</a>). В частности (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved</a>), основные этапы процесса определения ключевого района биоразнообразия следующие: </p>\n<ol>\n <li> представление заявлений о намерениях определить ключевую область биоразнообразия\nрегиональным координационным центрам; </li>\n <li> процесс разработки предложения, в ходе которого заявители собирают соответствующие\nданные и документацию и консультируются с национальными экспертами, включая организации, которые уже определили ключевые области биоразнообразия в стране, либо через национальные координационные группы по ключевым областям биоразнообразия, либо независимо; </li>\n <li> обзор предложенных ключевых областей биоразнообразия независимыми экспертами-рецензентами,\nпроверка точности информации в пределах их области знаний; и </li>\n <li> этап номинации участка, включающий представление всей соответствующей документации\nдля проверки Секретариатом ключевых территорий биоразнообразия (см. Раздел 3.3 ниже). </li> </ol>\n<p> После определения ключевого района сохранения биоразнообразия становится важным организация мониторинга его квалифицирующих характеристик и статуса сохранения. Авторы предложений, рецензенты и те, кто проводит мониторинг, могут присоединиться к Сообществу по ключевым областям сохранения биоразнообразия, чтобы обмениваться своим опытом, результатами тематических исследований и примерами передовой практики. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p><strong><em>PAs</em></strong></p>\n<p>Data on protected areas are submitted by government agencies to the WDPA and disseminated through Protected Planet. The WDPA has its origins in a 1959 UN mandate when the United Nations Economic and Social Council called for a list of national parks and equivalent reserves Resolution 713 (XXVIII). </p>\n<p>Protected areas data are therefore compiled directly from government agencies, regional hubs and other authoritative sources in the absence of a government source. All records have a unique metadata identifier (MetadataID) which links the spatial database to the Source table where all sources are described. The data is collated and standardised following the WDPA Data Standards and validated with the source. The process of collation, validation and publication of data as well as protocols and the WDPA data standards are regularly updated in the WDPA User Manual (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) made available through www.protectedplanet.net where all spatial data and the Source table are also published every month and can be downloaded. The WDPA User Manual (published in English, Spanish, and French) provides guidance to countries on how to submit protected areas data to the WDPA, the benefits of providing such data, and the data standards and quality checks that are performed. </p>\n<p><strong><em>OECMS</em></strong></p>\n<p>Guiding principles, common characteristics and criteria for identification of OECMs are available in CBD (2018) at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>.</p>\n<p>Guidance on recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures is available in IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019) at: <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773</a>.</p>\n<p><strong><em>KBAs</em></strong></p>\n<p>The “Global Standard for the Identification of KBAs” (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>) comprises the standard recommendations available to countries in the identification of KBAs. Guidelines for using A global standard for the identification of KBAs are available at https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/49131.</p>\n<p>Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>A summary of the process by which KBAs are identified is available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating\">www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating</a>.</p>\n<p>The KBA identification process is highly inclusive, consultative and nationally driven. Anyone with appropriate data may propose a site as a KBA, although consultation with relevant stakeholders at the local and national level is required when identifying the site and needs to be documented in the proposal. In order to propose a site as a KBA, a proposer must apply the KBA criteria to data on biodiversity elements (species and ecosystems) at the site. Associated with the proposal process is the need to delineate the site accurately so that its boundaries are clear. Although anyone with appropriate scientific data may propose a site to qualify as a KBA, wide consultation with stakeholders at the national level (both non-governmental and governmental organizations) is required during the proposal process. The formal proposal is then made using a proposal process that ensures there is an independent review of the proposal before a site is incorporated in the WDKBA. This is important given that KBA status of a site may lead to changes in actions of governments, private sector companies and other institutions following consultation as appropriate. </p>\n<p>KBA identification builds off the existing network of KBAs, including those identified as (a) Important Bird & Biodiversity Areas through the BirdLife Partnership of over 115 national organisations (https://www.birdlife.org/who-we-are/), (b) Alliance for Zero Extinction sites by 93 national and international organisations in the Alliance (<a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html\">http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html</a>), and (c) other KBAs by civil society organisations supported by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund in developing ecosystem profiles, named in each of the profiles listed here (<a href=\"http://www.cepf.net\">http://www.cepf.net</a> ), with new data strengthening and expanding expand the network of these sites.</p>\n<p>The main steps of the KBA identification process are the following: </p>\n<ol>\n <li>submission of Expressions of Intent to identify a KBA to Regional Focal Points; </li>\n <li>Proposal Development process, in which proposers compile relevant data and documentation and consult national experts, including organizations that have already identified KBAs in the country, either through national KBA Coordination Groups or independently;</li>\n <li>review of proposed KBAs by Independent Expert Reviewers, verifying the accuracy of information within their area of expertise; and</li>\n <li>a Site Nomination phase comprising the submission of all the relevant documentation for verification by the KBAs Secretariat. Sites confirmed by the KBAs Secretariat to qualify as KBAs are then published on the KBAs website (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>).</li>\n</ol>\n<p>Once a KBA is identified, monitoring of its qualifying features and its conservation status is important. Proposers, reviewers and those undertaking monitoring can join the KBAs Community to exchange their experiences, case studies and best practice examples.</p>\n<p>The R code for calculating protected area coverage of KBAs is documented in Simkins et al. (2020). </p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684794, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684794/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679647/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199227+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p><strong><em>PAs</em></strong></p>\n<p>Data on protected areas are submitted by government agencies to the WDPA and disseminated through Protected Planet. The WDPA has its origins in a 1959 UN mandate when the United Nations Economic and Social Council called for a list of national parks and equivalent reserves Resolution 713 (XXVIII). </p>\n<p>Protected areas data are therefore compiled directly from government agencies, regional hubs and other authoritative sources in the absence of a government source. All records have a unique metadata identifier (MetadataID) which links the spatial database to the Source table where all sources are described. The data is collated and standardised following the WDPA Data Standards and validated with the source. The process of collation, validation and publication of data as well as protocols and the WDPA data standards are regularly updated in the WDPA User Manual (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) made available through www.protectedplanet.net where all spatial data and the Source table are also published every month and can be downloaded. The WDPA User Manual (published in English, Spanish, and French) provides guidance to countries on how to submit protected areas data to the WDPA, the benefits of providing such data, and the data standards and quality checks that are performed. </p>\n<p><strong><em>OECMS</em></strong></p>\n<p>Guiding principles, common characteristics and criteria for identification of OECMs are available in CBD (2018) at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>.</p>\n<p>Guidance on recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures is available in IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019) at: <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773</a>.</p>\n<p><strong><em>KBAs</em></strong></p>\n<p>The “Global Standard for the Identification of KBAs” (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>) comprises the standard recommendations available to countries in the identification of KBAs. Guidelines for using A global standard for the identification of KBAs are available at https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/49131.</p>\n<p>Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>A summary of the process by which KBAs are identified is available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating\">www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating</a>.</p>\n<p>The KBA identification process is highly inclusive, consultative and nationally driven. Anyone with appropriate data may propose a site as a KBA, although consultation with relevant stakeholders at the local and national level is required when identifying the site and needs to be documented in the proposal. In order to propose a site as a KBA, a proposer must apply the KBA criteria to data on biodiversity elements (species and ecosystems) at the site. Associated with the proposal process is the need to delineate the site accurately so that its boundaries are clear. Although anyone with appropriate scientific data may propose a site to qualify as a KBA, wide consultation with stakeholders at the national level (both non-governmental and governmental organizations) is required during the proposal process. The formal proposal is then made using a proposal process that ensures there is an independent review of the proposal before a site is incorporated in the WDKBA. This is important given that KBA status of a site may lead to changes in actions of governments, private sector companies and other institutions following consultation as appropriate. </p>\n<p>KBA identification builds off the existing network of KBAs, including those identified as (a) Important Bird & Biodiversity Areas through the BirdLife Partnership of over 115 national organisations (https://www.birdlife.org/who-we-are/), (b) Alliance for Zero Extinction sites by 93 national and international organisations in the Alliance (<a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html\">http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html</a>), and (c) other KBAs by civil society organisations supported by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund in developing ecosystem profiles, named in each of the profiles listed here (<a href=\"http://www.cepf.net\">http://www.cepf.net</a> ), with new data strengthening and expanding expand the network of these sites.</p>\n<p>The main steps of the KBA identification process are the following: </p>\n<ol>\n <li>submission of Expressions of Intent to identify a KBA to Regional Focal Points; </li>\n <li>Proposal Development process, in which proposers compile relevant data and documentation and consult national experts, including organizations that have already identified KBAs in the country, either through national KBA Coordination Groups or independently;</li>\n <li>review of proposed KBAs by Independent Expert Reviewers, verifying the accuracy of information within their area of expertise; and</li>\n <li>a Site Nomination phase comprising the submission of all the relevant documentation for verification by the KBAs Secretariat. Sites confirmed by the KBAs Secretariat to qualify as KBAs are then published on the KBAs website (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>).</li>\n</ol>\n<p>Once a KBA is identified, monitoring of its qualifying features and its conservation status is important. Proposers, reviewers and those undertaking monitoring can join the KBAs Community to exchange their experiences, case studies and best practice examples.</p>\n<p>The R code for calculating protected area coverage of KBAs is documented in Simkins et al. (2020). </p>", "old": "<p><strong><em>Protected areas</em></strong></p>\n<p>Data on protected areas are submitted by government agencies to the World Database on Protected Areas and disseminated through Protected Planet. The WDPA has its origins in a 1959 UN mandate when the United Nations Economic and Social Council called for a list of national parks and equivalent reserves Resolution 713 (XXVIII). More details are available here: https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas. The UN List of Protected Areas has been published in 1961/62, 1966/71, 1972 (addendum to the 1966/71 edition), 1973, 1974, 1975, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1990, 1993, 1997, 2003, 2014 and 2018 which have resulted in a global network of national data providers for the WDPA. For example, in 2014 all Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) National Focal points and all National Focal points for the CBD Protected Areas Programme of Work (PoWPA) to request data for the 2014 Un List of Protected Areas (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas-2014\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas/united-nations-list-of-protected-areas-2014</a>). Protected areas data are therefore compiled directly from government agencies, regional hubs and other authoritative sources in the absence of a government source. All records have a unique metadata identifier (MetadataID) which links the spatial database to the Source table where all sources are described. The data is collated and standardised following the WDPA Data Standards and validated with the source. The process of collation, validation and publication of data as well as protocols and the WDPA data standards are regularly updated in the WDPA User Manual (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) made available through www.protectedplanet.net where all spatial data and the Source table are also published every month and can be downloaded. The WDPA User Manual (published in English, Spanish, and French) provides guidance to countries on how to submit protected areas data to the WDPA, the benefits of providing such data, and the data standards and quality checks that are performed. </p>\n<p><em>Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures</em></p>\n<p>Guiding principles, common characteristics and criteria for identification of OECMs are available in CBD (2018) at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>.</p>\n<p>Guidance on recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures is available in IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019) at: <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773</a>.</p>\n<p><em>Key Biodiversity Areas</em></p>\n<p>The “Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas” (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>) comprises the standard recommendations available to countries in the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. Guidelines for using A global standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas are available at https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/49131.</p>\n<p>Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>A summary of the process by which Key Biodiversity Areas are identified is available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating\">www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating</a>.</p>\n<p>The KBA identification process is highly inclusive, consultative and nationally driven. Anyone with appropriate data may propose a site as a KBA, although consultation with relevant stakeholders at the local and national level is required when identifying the site and needs to be documented in the proposal. In order to propose a site as a KBA, a proposer must apply the KBA criteria to data on biodiversity elements (species and ecosystems) at the site. Associated with the proposal process is the need to delineate the site accurately so that its boundaries are clear. Although anyone with appropriate scientific data may propose a site to qualify as a Key Biodiversity Area, wide consultation with stakeholders at the national level (both non-governmental and governmental organizations) is required during the proposal process. The formal proposal is then made using a proposal process that ensures there is an independent review of the proposal before a site is incorporated in the World Database of KBAs. This is important given that KBA status of a site may lead to changes in actions of governments, private sector companies and other institutions following consultation as appropriate. </p>\n<p>Key Biodiversity Area identification builds off the existing network of Key Biodiversity Areas, including those identified as (a) Important Bird & Biodiversity Areas through the BirdLife Partnership of 120 national organisations (<a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/worldwide/partnership/birdlife-partners\">http://www.birdlife.org/worldwide/partnership/birdlife-partners</a>), (b) Alliance for Zero Extinction sites by 93 national and international organisations in the Alliance (<a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html\">http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html</a>), and (c) other Key Biodiversity Areas by civil society organisations supported by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund in developing ecosystem profiles, named in each of the profiles listed here (<a href=\"http://www.cepf.net/resources/publications/Pages/ecosystem_profiles.aspx\">http://www.cepf.net/resources/publications/Pages/ecosystem_profiles.aspx</a>), with new data strengthening and expanding expand the network of these sites.</p>\n<p>The main steps of the Key Biodiversity Area identification process are the following: </p>\n<ol>\n <li>submission of Expressions of Intent to identify a Key Biodiversity Area to Regional Focal Points; </li>\n <li>Proposal Development process, in which proposers compile relevant data and documentation and consult national experts, including organizations that have already identified Key Biodiversity Areas in the country, either through national Key Biodiversity Area Coordination Groups or independently;</li>\n <li>review of proposed Key Biodiversity Areas by Independent Expert Reviewers, verifying the accuracy of information within their area of expertise; and</li>\n <li>a Site Nomination phase comprising the submission of all the relevant documentation for verification by the Key Biodiversity Areas Secretariat. Sites confirmed by the Key Biodiversity Areas Secretariat to qualify as Key Biodiversity Areas are then published on the Key Biodiversity Areas website (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>).</li>\n</ol>\n<p>Once a Key Biodiversity Area is identified, monitoring of its qualifying features and its conservation status is important. Proposers, reviewers and those undertaking monitoring can join the Key Biodiversity Areas Community to exchange their experiences, case studies and best practice examples.</p>\n<p>The R code for calculating protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas is documented in Simkins et al. (2020). </p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684793, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684793/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679642/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199120+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h2> Региональные агрегаты: </h2>\n<p> Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) является агентством, отвечающим за расчет и представление глобальных и региональных показателей по этому показателю, работая совместно с Международной ассоциацией по защите птиц (BLI) и Международным союзом охраны природы (МСОП) над объединением данных по охраняемым территориям с данными по районам, важным для сохранения биоразнообразия. UNEP-WCMC агрегирует глобальные и региональные данные по охраняемым территориям из национальных данных, которые берутся для расчета из Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям и распространяются через визуальный интерфейс Защищенная планета. Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям и Защищенная планета совместно управляются Программой ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) и Международным союзом охраны природы (МСОП), а также входящей в него Всемирной комиссией по охраняемым территориям. Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям находится в Географической информационной системе, в которой хранится информация по охраняемым территориям, такая как их название, размер, тип, дата создания, географическое месторасположение (точка) и / или граница (полигон). Охват охраняемых территорий рассчитывается с использованием информации обо всех охраняемых территориях, зарегистрированных во Всемирной базе данных по охраняемым территориям, расположение и протяженность которых известны, за исключением охраняемых территорий без оцифрованных границ и тех участков, которые имеют статус предлагаемых или по которым нет отчетности.</p>", "old": "<h2> Региональные агрегаты: </h2>\n<p> Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) является агентством, отвечающим за расчет и представление глобальных и региональных показателей по этому показателю, работая совместно с Международной ассоциацией по защите птиц (BLI) и Международным союзом охраны природы (МСОП) над объединением данных по охраняемым территориям с данными по районам, важным для сохранения биоразнообразия. UNEP-WCMC агрегирует глобальные и региональные данные по охраняемым территориям из национальных данных, которые берутся для расчета из Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям и распространяются через визуальный интерфейс Защищенная планета. Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям и Защищенная планета совместно управляются Программой ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) и Международным союзом охраны природы (МСОП), а также входящей в него Всемирной комиссией по охраняемым территориям. Всемирная база данных по охраняемым территориям находится в Географической информационной системе, в которой хранится информация по охраняемым территориям, такая как их название, размер, тип, дата создания, географическое месторасположение (точка) и / или граница (полигон). Охват охраняемых территорий рассчитывается с использованием информации обо всех охраняемых территориях, зарегистрированных во Всемирной базе данных по охраняемым территориям, расположение и протяженность которых известны, за исключением охраняемых территорий без оцифрованных границ и тех участков, которые имеют статус предлагаемых или по которым нет отчетности.</p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>Regional indices are calculated as the mean percentage of each KBA in the region covered by (i.e. overlapping with) protected areas and/or OECMs: in other words, the percentage of each KBA covered by these designations, averaged over all KBAs in the particular region.</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684792, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684792/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679642/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.199019+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>Regional indices are calculated as the mean percentage of each KBA in the region covered by (i.e. overlapping with) protected areas and/or OECMs: in other words, the percentage of each KBA covered by these designations, averaged over all KBAs in the particular region.</p>", "old": "<p>Regional indices are calculated as the mean percentage of each Key Biodiversity Area in the region covered by (i.e. overlapping with) protected areas and/or Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures: in other words, the percentage of each Key Biodiversity Area covered by these designations, averaged over all Key Biodiversity Areas in the particular region.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684791, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684791/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679635/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198907+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<p> <strong> Обработка отсутствующих значений: </strong> </p>\n<ul>\n <li> <strong> <em> На страновом уровне: </em> </strong> </li>\n</ul>\n<p> Данные доступны по охраняемым территориям и ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия во всех ’ странах мира, поэтому вменение или оценка данных на национальном уровне не требуется. </p>\n<ul>\n <li> <strong> <em> На региональном и глобальном уровнях: </em> </strong> </li>\n</ul>\n<p> Глобальные показатели охвата охраняемыми территориями участков, важных для сохранения биоразнообразия, рассчитываются как среднее процентное значение по каждой ключевой территории сохранения биоразнообразия, охваченной охраняемыми территориями. Данные получены из всех стран, поэтому, несмотря на неопределенность в отношении данных, отсутствующих значений нет как таковых, и поэтому нет необходимости во вменении или оценке значений.</p>", "old": "<p> <strong> Обработка отсутствующих значений: </strong> </p>\n<ul>\n <li> <strong> <em> На страновом уровне: </em> </strong> </li>\n</ul>\n<p> Данные доступны по охраняемым территориям и ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия во всех ’ странах мира, поэтому вменение или оценка данных на национальном уровне не требуется. </p>\n<ul>\n <li> <strong> <em> На региональном и глобальном уровнях: </em> </strong> </li>\n</ul>\n<p> Глобальные показатели охвата охраняемыми территориями участков, важных для сохранения биоразнообразия, рассчитываются как среднее процентное значение по каждой ключевой территории сохранения биоразнообразия, охваченной охраняемыми территориями. Данные получены из всех стран, поэтому, несмотря на неопределенность в отношении данных, отсутствующих значений нет как таковых, и поэтому нет необходимости во вменении или оценке значений.</p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p><strong>• At country level</strong></p>\n<p>Data are available for protected areas and KBAs in all of the world’s countries, and so no imputation or estimation of national level data is necessary.</p>\n<p> </p>\n<p><strong>• At regional and global levels</strong></p>\n<p>Global indicators of protected area coverage of important sites for biodiversity are calculated as the mean percentage of each KBA that is covered by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. The data are generated from all countries, and so while there is uncertainty around the data, there are no missing values as such and so no need for imputation or estimation.</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684790, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684790/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679635/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198799+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p><strong>• At country level</strong></p>\n<p>Data are available for protected areas and KBAs in all of the world’s countries, and so no imputation or estimation of national level data is necessary.</p>\n<p> </p>\n<p><strong>• At regional and global levels</strong></p>\n<p>Global indicators of protected area coverage of important sites for biodiversity are calculated as the mean percentage of each KBA that is covered by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. The data are generated from all countries, and so while there is uncertainty around the data, there are no missing values as such and so no need for imputation or estimation.</p>", "old": "<p><strong>• At country level</strong></p>\n<p>Data are available for protected areas and Key Biodiversity Areas in all of the world’s countries, and so no imputation or estimation of national level data is necessary.</p>\n<p> </p>\n<p><strong>• At regional and global levels</strong></p>\n<p>Global indicators of protected area coverage of important sites for biodiversity are calculated as the mean percentage of each Key Biodiversity Area that is covered by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. The data are generated from all countries, and so while there is uncertainty around the data, there are no missing values as such and so no need for imputation or estimation.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684789, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684789/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798208/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198676+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>Protected Areas and OECMs are validated through dialogue with the governing authority, who signs a data contributor agreement that these sites are, to the best of their knowledge, an accurate depiction of the sites in question. Over time the data for sites may improve or other aspects of the sites may change, as and when this occurs a further data sharing agreement is required by the site’s governing authority.</p>\n<p>Proposed KBAs undergo detailed checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominated KBAs by the KBAs Secretariat. For further information, see the Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>When the indicators of protected area coverage of KBAs are updated each year, the updated indicators (and underlying numbers of protected areas, OECMs, and KBAs) are made available for review by countries prior to submission to the SDG Indicators Database. This is achieved through updating the country profiles in the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (<a href=\"https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles\">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>) and circulating these for consultation and review to CBD National Focal Points, SDG National Statistical Office Focal Points, and IUCN State Members.</p>\n<p>When the indicators of protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas are updated each year, the updated indicators (and underlying numbers of protected areas, Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures, and Key Biodiversity Areas) are made available for review by countries prior to submission to the SDG Indicators Database. This is achieved through updating the country profiles in the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (<a href=\"https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles\">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>) and circulating these for consultation and review to CBD National Focal Points, SDG National Statistical Office Focal Points, and IUCN State Members.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684788, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684788/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679627/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198539+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h2> Комментарии и ограничения: </h2>\n<p> Критерии контроля качества применяются для обеспечения согласованности и сопоставимости данных во Всемирной базе данных по охраняемым территориям. Новые данные подвергаются валидации в Программе ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирном центре мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) с помощью ряда инструментов и переводятся в стандартную структуру данных Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям. Расхождения между данными Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям и новыми данными сводятся к минимуму с помощью руководства (UNEP-WCMC 2019) и устраняются при общении с поставщиками данных. Аналогичные процессы применяются для включения данных в <em> Всемирную базу данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия </em> (BirdLife International 2019). </p>\n<p> Показатель не оценивает эффективность мер на охраняемых территориях с точки зрения сокращения потерь в биоразнообразии, что в итоге зависит от ряда факторов управления и обеспечения исполнения, не охватываемых показателем. В настоящее время проводится ряд мероприятий по устранению этого ограничения. В частности, для оценки управления охраняемыми территориями были разработаны многочисленные механизмы, которые можно синтезировать в показателе (Leverington et al. 2010). Он используется Партнерством по показателям сохранения биоразнообразия в качестве дополнительного показателя прогресса в достижении Цели 11 по сохранению биоразнообразия, упомянутой в Айтинских целевых задачах в области биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.bipindicators.net/pamanagement\">http://www.bipindicators.net/pamanagement</a>). </p>\n <p>Однако связь между этими оценками и результатами деятельности на охраняемых\nтерриториях может быть не очень явной (Nolte & Agrawal 2013). Совсем недавно подходы к Зеленому списку начали разрабатываться, чтобы учитывать такие факторы, как эффективность управления и результаты деятельности на охраняемых территориях, и они, вероятно, будут становиться все более важными по мере их проверки и более широкого применения.</p> <p>Пробелы в данных и знаниях могут возникнуть из-за трудностей с определением того, соответствует ли участок определению охраняемой территории МСОП, а некоторым охраняемым территориям не присвоены категории управления. Более того, другие эффективные природоохранные меры, основанные на территориальном подходе, и, как указано в целевой задаче 11 Айтинских целевых задач в области биоразнообразия Стратегического плана по сохранению и устойчивому использованию биоразнообразия на 2011-2013 гг., признают, что некоторые участки за пределами официальной сети охраняемых территорий, хотя и не управляются изначально с целью сохранения природы, тем не менее, их можно регулировать способами, которые соответствуют политике сохранения биоразнообразия, для которой они являются важными (Jonas et al. 2014). Тем не менее, официально согласованные определения OECM - инициативы \"Другая эффективная мера по сохранению биоразнообразия, основанная на территориальном подходе\" (географически определенная территория, отличная от охраняемой территории, которая регулируется и управляется таким образом, чтобы достичь положительных и устойчивых долгосрочных результатов для сохранения биоразнообразия на месте, с соответствующими экосистемными функциями и услугами, а также, где это применимо, культурными, духовными, социально-экономическими и другими значимыми на местном уровне ценностными ориентирами) были согласованы только в ноябре 2018 года, а меры по предоставлению странами данных ОЕСМ в UNEP-WCMC приняты совсем недавно. В настоящее время OECM сопоставляются Программой ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) в отдельной базе данных, Всемирной базе данных инициативы \"Другая эффективная мера по сохранению биоразнообразия, основанная на территориальном подходе\" (WD-OECM). </p>\n<p> Что касается важных участков, то самым большим ограничением является то, что идентификация участков на сегодняшний день сосредоточена в основном на конкретных подмножествах биоразнообразия, например, птицах (для важных территорий орнитологического и иного биоразнообразия) и видах, находящихся под угрозой исчезновения (для территорий Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения). В то время как важные территории для орнитологического и иного биоразнообразия были задокументированы как подходящие заменители биоразнообразия в целом (Brooks et al. 2001, Pain et al. 2005), применение единого стандарта для определения ключевых территорий биоразнообразия (IUCN 2016) на разных уровнях биоразнообразия (гены, виды, экосистемы) и различных таксономических группах остается высокоприоритетной задачей, исходя из предпринятых на сегодняшний день усилий (Eken et al. 2004, Knight et al. 2007, Langhammer et al. 2007, Foster et al. 2012). В настоящее время птицы составляют < 50% видов, для которых были определены ключевые районы биоразнообразия, и по мере того, как происходит идентификация ключевых районов биоразнообразия для других таксонов и элементов биоразнообразия, такой крен в будущем сократится.</p>\n<p> Идентификация ключевых территорий сохранения биоразнообразия была подтверждена для ряда стран и регионов, где исчерпывающие данные о биоразнообразии позволяют формально рассчитать важность (или «незаменимость») с использованием методов систематического природоохранного планирования (Di Marco et al., 2016, Montesino Pouzols et al. 2014).</p>\n<p> Дальнейшие разработки показателя будут включать: a) расширение таксономического охвата ключевых территорий сохранения горного биоразнообразия путем применения стандарта для ключевых районов биоразнообразия (МСОП 2016) к широкому спектру горных позвоночных, беспозвоночных, растений и типов экосистем; б) улучшения данных по охраняемым территориям за счет продолжения процесса по увеличению доли участков с задокументированными датами назначения полномочий и с полигонами, имеющими оцифрованные границы (а не координаты). </p>", "old": "<h2> Комментарии и ограничения: </h2>\n<p> Критерии контроля качества применяются для обеспечения согласованности и сопоставимости данных во Всемирной базе данных по охраняемым территориям. Новые данные подвергаются валидации в Программе ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирном центре мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) с помощью ряда инструментов и переводятся в стандартную структуру данных Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям. Расхождения между данными Всемирной базы данных по охраняемым территориям и новыми данными сводятся к минимуму с помощью руководства (UNEP-WCMC 2019) и устраняются при общении с поставщиками данных. Аналогичные процессы применяются для включения данных в <em> Всемирную базу данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия </em> (BirdLife International 2019). </p>\n<p> Показатель не оценивает эффективность мер на охраняемых территориях с точки зрения сокращения потерь в биоразнообразии, что в итоге зависит от ряда факторов управления и обеспечения исполнения, не охватываемых показателем. В настоящее время проводится ряд мероприятий по устранению этого ограничения. В частности, для оценки управления охраняемыми территориями были разработаны многочисленные механизмы, которые можно синтезировать в показателе (Leverington et al. 2010). Он используется Партнерством по показателям сохранения биоразнообразия в качестве дополнительного показателя прогресса в достижении Цели 11 по сохранению биоразнообразия, упомянутой в Айтинских целевых задачах в области биоразнообразия (<a href=\"http://www.bipindicators.net/pamanagement\">http://www.bipindicators.net/pamanagement</a>). </p>\n <p>Однако связь между этими оценками и результатами деятельности на охраняемых\nтерриториях может быть не очень явной (Nolte & Agrawal 2013). Совсем недавно подходы к Зеленому списку начали разрабатываться, чтобы учитывать такие факторы, как эффективность управления и результаты деятельности на охраняемых территориях, и они, вероятно, будут становиться все более важными по мере их проверки и более широкого применения.</p> <p>Пробелы в данных и знаниях могут возникнуть из-за трудностей с определением того, соответствует ли участок определению охраняемой территории МСОП, а некоторым охраняемым территориям не присвоены категории управления. Более того, другие эффективные природоохранные меры, основанные на территориальном подходе, и, как указано в целевой задаче 11 Айтинских целевых задач в области биоразнообразия Стратегического плана по сохранению и устойчивому использованию биоразнообразия на 2011-2013 гг., признают, что некоторые участки за пределами официальной сети охраняемых территорий, хотя и не управляются изначально с целью сохранения природы, тем не менее, их можно регулировать способами, которые соответствуют политике сохранения биоразнообразия, для которой они являются важными (Jonas et al. 2014). Тем не менее, официально согласованные определения OECM - инициативы \"Другая эффективная мера по сохранению биоразнообразия, основанная на территориальном подходе\" (географически определенная территория, отличная от охраняемой территории, которая регулируется и управляется таким образом, чтобы достичь положительных и устойчивых долгосрочных результатов для сохранения биоразнообразия на месте, с соответствующими экосистемными функциями и услугами, а также, где это применимо, культурными, духовными, социально-экономическими и другими значимыми на местном уровне ценностными ориентирами) были согласованы только в ноябре 2018 года, а меры по предоставлению странами данных ОЕСМ в UNEP-WCMC приняты совсем недавно. В настоящее время OECM сопоставляются Программой ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) в отдельной базе данных, Всемирной базе данных инициативы \"Другая эффективная мера по сохранению биоразнообразия, основанная на территориальном подходе\" (WD-OECM). </p>\n<p> Что касается важных участков, то самым большим ограничением является то, что идентификация участков на сегодняшний день сосредоточена в основном на конкретных подмножествах биоразнообразия, например, птицах (для важных территорий орнитологического и иного биоразнообразия) и видах, находящихся под угрозой исчезновения (для территорий Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения). В то время как важные территории для орнитологического и иного биоразнообразия были задокументированы как подходящие заменители биоразнообразия в целом (Brooks et al. 2001, Pain et al. 2005), применение единого стандарта для определения ключевых территорий биоразнообразия (IUCN 2016) на разных уровнях биоразнообразия (гены, виды, экосистемы) и различных таксономических группах остается высокоприоритетной задачей, исходя из предпринятых на сегодняшний день усилий (Eken et al. 2004, Knight et al. 2007, Langhammer et al. 2007, Foster et al. 2012). В настоящее время птицы составляют < 50% видов, для которых были определены ключевые районы биоразнообразия, и по мере того, как происходит идентификация ключевых районов биоразнообразия для других таксонов и элементов биоразнообразия, такой крен в будущем сократится.</p>\n<p> Идентификация ключевых территорий сохранения биоразнообразия была подтверждена для ряда стран и регионов, где исчерпывающие данные о биоразнообразии позволяют формально рассчитать важность (или «незаменимость») с использованием методов систематического природоохранного планирования (Di Marco et al., 2016, Montesino Pouzols et al. 2014).</p>\n<p> Дальнейшие разработки показателя будут включать: a) расширение таксономического охвата ключевых территорий сохранения горного биоразнообразия путем применения стандарта для ключевых районов биоразнообразия (МСОП 2016) к широкому спектру горных позвоночных, беспозвоночных, растений и типов экосистем; б) улучшения данных по охраняемым территориям за счет продолжения процесса по увеличению доли участков с задокументированными датами назначения полномочий и с полигонами, имеющими оцифрованные границы (а не координаты). </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>Quality control criteria are applied to ensure consistency and comparability of the data in the WDPA. New data are validated at UNEP-WCMC through a number of tools and translated into the standard data structure of the WDPA. Discrepancies between the data in the WDPA and new data are minimised by provision of a manual (UNEP-WCMC 2019) and resolved in communication with data providers. Similar processes apply for the incorporation of data into the WDKBA (BirdLife International 2019).</p>\n<p>The indicator does not measure the effectiveness of protected areas in reducing biodiversity loss, which ultimately depends on a range of management and enforcement factors not covered by the indicator. A number of initiatives are underway to address this limitation. Most notably, numerous mechanisms have been developed for assessment of protected area management, which can be synthesised into an indicator (Leverington et al. 2010). This is used by the Biodiversity Indicators Partnership as a complementary indicator of progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 </p>\n<p>(http://www.bipindicators.net/pamanagement). However, there may be little relationship between these measures and protected area outcomes (Nolte & Agrawal 2013). More recently, approaches to “green listing” have started to be developed, to incorporate both management effectiveness and the outcomes of protected areas, and these are likely to become progressively important as they are tested and applied more broadly.</p>\n<p>Data and knowledge gaps can arise due to difficulties in determining whether a site conforms to the IUCN definition of a protected area or the CBD definition of an OECM. However, given that both are incorporated into the indicator, misclassifications (as one or the other) do not impact the calculated indicator value.</p>\n<p>Regarding important sites, the biggest limitation is that site identification to date has focused mainly on specific subsets of biodiversity, for example birds (for Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas) and highly threatened species (for Alliance for Zero Extinction sites). While Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas have been documented to be good surrogates for biodiversity more generally (Brooks et al. 2001, Pain et al. 2005), the application of the unified standard for identification of KBA sites (IUCN 2016) across different levels of biodiversity (genes, species, ecosystems) and different taxonomic groups remains a high priority, building from efforts to date (Eken et al. 2004, Knight et al. 2007, Langhammer et al. 2007, Foster et al. 2012). Birds now comprise less than 50% of the species for which KBAs have been identified, and as KBA identification for other taxa and elements of biodiversity proceeds, such bias will become a less important consideration in the future.</p>\n<p>KBA identification has been validated for a number of countries and regions where comprehensive biodiversity data allow formal calculation of the site importance (or “irreplaceability”) using systematic conservation planning techniques (Di Marco et al. 2016, Montesino Pouzols et al. 2014).</p>\n<p>Future developments of the indicator will include: a) expansion of the taxonomic coverage of mountain KBAs through application of the KBA standard (IUCN 2016) to a wide variety of mountain vertebrates, invertebrates, plants and ecosystem type; b) improvements in the data on protected areas by continuing to increase the proportion of sites with documented dates of designation and with digitised boundary polygons (rather than coordinates); and c) increased documentation of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures in the World Database of OECMs.</p>", "old_state": 20 }, "id": 47684787, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684787/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679627/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198431+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>Quality control criteria are applied to ensure consistency and comparability of the data in the WDPA. New data are validated at UNEP-WCMC through a number of tools and translated into the standard data structure of the WDPA. Discrepancies between the data in the WDPA and new data are minimised by provision of a manual (UNEP-WCMC 2019) and resolved in communication with data providers. Similar processes apply for the incorporation of data into the WDKBA (BirdLife International 2019).</p>\n<p>The indicator does not measure the effectiveness of protected areas in reducing biodiversity loss, which ultimately depends on a range of management and enforcement factors not covered by the indicator. A number of initiatives are underway to address this limitation. Most notably, numerous mechanisms have been developed for assessment of protected area management, which can be synthesised into an indicator (Leverington et al. 2010). This is used by the Biodiversity Indicators Partnership as a complementary indicator of progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 </p>\n<p>(http://www.bipindicators.net/pamanagement). However, there may be little relationship between these measures and protected area outcomes (Nolte & Agrawal 2013). More recently, approaches to “green listing” have started to be developed, to incorporate both management effectiveness and the outcomes of protected areas, and these are likely to become progressively important as they are tested and applied more broadly.</p>\n<p>Data and knowledge gaps can arise due to difficulties in determining whether a site conforms to the IUCN definition of a protected area or the CBD definition of an OECM. However, given that both are incorporated into the indicator, misclassifications (as one or the other) do not impact the calculated indicator value.</p>\n<p>Regarding important sites, the biggest limitation is that site identification to date has focused mainly on specific subsets of biodiversity, for example birds (for Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas) and highly threatened species (for Alliance for Zero Extinction sites). While Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas have been documented to be good surrogates for biodiversity more generally (Brooks et al. 2001, Pain et al. 2005), the application of the unified standard for identification of KBA sites (IUCN 2016) across different levels of biodiversity (genes, species, ecosystems) and different taxonomic groups remains a high priority, building from efforts to date (Eken et al. 2004, Knight et al. 2007, Langhammer et al. 2007, Foster et al. 2012). Birds now comprise less than 50% of the species for which KBAs have been identified, and as KBA identification for other taxa and elements of biodiversity proceeds, such bias will become a less important consideration in the future.</p>\n<p>KBA identification has been validated for a number of countries and regions where comprehensive biodiversity data allow formal calculation of the site importance (or “irreplaceability”) using systematic conservation planning techniques (Di Marco et al. 2016, Montesino Pouzols et al. 2014).</p>\n<p>Future developments of the indicator will include: a) expansion of the taxonomic coverage of mountain KBAs through application of the KBA standard (IUCN 2016) to a wide variety of mountain vertebrates, invertebrates, plants and ecosystem type; b) improvements in the data on protected areas by continuing to increase the proportion of sites with documented dates of designation and with digitised boundary polygons (rather than coordinates); and c) increased documentation of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures in the World Database of OECMs.</p>", "old": "<p>Quality control criteria are applied to ensure consistency and comparability of the data in the World Database on Protected Areas. New data are validated at UNEP-WCMC through a number of tools and translated into the standard data structure of the World Database on Protected Areas. Discrepancies between the data in the World Database on Protected Areas and new data are minimised by provision of a manual (UNEP-WCMC 2019) and resolved in communication with data providers. Similar processes apply for the incorporation of data into the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas (BirdLife International 2019).</p>\n<p>The indicator does not measure the effectiveness of protected areas in reducing biodiversity loss, which ultimately depends on a range of management and enforcement factors not covered by the indicator. A number of initiatives are underway to address this limitation. Most notably, numerous mechanisms have been developed for assessment of protected area management, which can be synthesised into an indicator (Leverington et al. 2010). This is used by the Biodiversity Indicators Partnership as a complementary indicator of progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 </p>\n<p>(http://www.bipindicators.net/pamanagement). However, there may be little relationship between these measures and protected area outcomes (Nolte & Agrawal 2013). More recently, approaches to “green listing” have started to be developed, to incorporate both management effectiveness and the outcomes of protected areas, and these are likely to become progressively important as they are tested and applied more broadly.</p>\n<p>Data and knowledge gaps can arise due to difficulties in determining whether a site conforms to the IUCN definition of a protected area or the CBD definition of an Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. However, given that both are incorporated into the indicator, misclassifications (as one or the other) do not impact the calculated indicator value.</p>\n<p>Regarding important sites, the biggest limitation is that site identification to date has focused mainly on specific subsets of biodiversity, for example birds (for Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas) and highly threatened species (for Alliance for Zero Extinction sites). While Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas have been documented to be good surrogates for biodiversity more generally (Brooks et al. 2001, Pain et al. 2005), the application of the unified standard for identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (IUCN 2016) sites across different levels of biodiversity (genes, species, ecosystems) and different taxonomic groups remains a high priority, building from efforts to date (Eken et al. 2004, Knight et al. 2007, Langhammer et al. 2007, Foster et al. 2012). Birds now comprise less than 50% of the species for which Key Biodiversity Areas have been identified, and as Key Biodiversity Area identification for other taxa and elements of biodiversity proceeds, such bias will become a less important consideration in the future.</p>\n<p>Key Biodiversity Area identification has been validated for a number of countries and regions where comprehensive biodiversity data allow formal calculation of the site importance (or “irreplaceability”) using systematic conservation planning techniques (Di Marco et al. 2016, Montesino Pouzols et al. 2014).</p>\n<p>Future developments of the indicator will include: a) expansion of the taxonomic coverage of mountain Key Biodiversity Areas through application of the Key Biodiversity Areas standard (IUCN 2016) to a wide variety of mountain vertebrates, invertebrates, plants and ecosystem type; b) improvements in the data on protected areas by continuing to increase the proportion of sites with documented dates of designation and with digitised boundary polygons (rather than coordinates); and c) increased documentation of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures in the World Database of OECMs.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684786, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684786/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798207/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198314+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>Protected area data and OECM data are aggregated globally into the WDPA and WDOECM by the UNEP-WCMC, according to the mandate for production of the United Nations List of Protected Areas (Deguignet et al. 2014). </p>\n<p>BirdLife International is mandated by the <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/dfbb558651f335617813f6c0c42f9e50\">KBAs Partnership Agreement</a> to manage data on KBAs in the WDKBAs on behalf of the KBAs Partnership.</p>\n<p>BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC collaborate to produce the indicator of coverage of KBAs by Protected Areas and OECMs.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684785, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684785/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679617/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198187+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h1> Составители данных </h1>\n<h2> Название: </h2>\n<p> Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы (UNEP-WCMC) и Международный союз охраны природы (МСОП) </p>\n<h2> Описание: </h2>\n<p> Данные по охраняемым территориям на глобальном уровне агрегируются во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям Программой ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы (UNEP-WCMC) в соответствии с полномочиями по составлению Списка ООН по охраняемым территориям (Deguignet et al. 2014). Данные распространяются через сайт <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/\">визуальный интерфейс Защищенная планета</a>, которым совместно управляют UNEP-WCMC и МСОП, а также входящая в него Всемирная комиссия по охраняемым территориям (UNEP-WCMC 2016 ). Данные по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия объединены во <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">Всемирную базу данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия</a>, управляемую Международной ассоциацией по защите птиц (2019). В частности, данные по важным орнитологическим территориям и территориям сохранения биоразнообразия доступны в Интернете по адресу <a href=\"http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search\">http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search</a>, а данные по территориям Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения доступны в Интернете по адресу <a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/search.cfm\">http://www.zeroextinction.org/search.cfm</a>. Оба набора данных вместе со Всемирной базой данных по охраняемым территориям также распространяются через <a href=\"https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/login\"> Инструмент интегрированной оценки биоразнообразия для исследований и планирования мероприятий по сохранению биоразнообразия</a>. </p>", "old": "<h1> Составители данных </h1>\n<h2> Название: </h2>\n<p> Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы (UNEP-WCMC) и Международный союз охраны природы (МСОП) </p>\n<h2> Описание: </h2>\n<p> Данные по охраняемым территориям на глобальном уровне агрегируются во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям Программой ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы (UNEP-WCMC) в соответствии с полномочиями по составлению Списка ООН по охраняемым территориям (Deguignet et al. 2014). Данные распространяются через сайт <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/\">визуальный интерфейс Защищенная планета</a>, которым совместно управляют UNEP-WCMC и МСОП, а также входящая в него Всемирная комиссия по охраняемым территориям (UNEP-WCMC 2016 ). Данные по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия объединены во <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">Всемирную базу данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия</a>, управляемую Международной ассоциацией по защите птиц (2019). В частности, данные по важным орнитологическим территориям и территориям сохранения биоразнообразия доступны в Интернете по адресу <a href=\"http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search\">http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search</a>, а данные по территориям Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения доступны в Интернете по адресу <a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/search.cfm\">http://www.zeroextinction.org/search.cfm</a>. Оба набора данных вместе со Всемирной базой данных по охраняемым территориям также распространяются через <a href=\"https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/login\"> Инструмент интегрированной оценки биоразнообразия для исследований и планирования мероприятий по сохранению биоразнообразия</a>. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>BirdLife International, IUCN, UNEP-WCMC</p>\n<p>Protected area data are aggregated globally into the WDPA by UNEP-WCMC, according to the mandate for production of the United Nations List of Protected Areas (Deguignet et al. 2014). They are disseminated through Protected Planet, which is jointly managed by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN and its World Commission on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC 2016). KBAs data are aggregated into the WDKBA, managed by BirdLife International (2019). </p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684784, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684784/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679617/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.198052+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>BirdLife International, IUCN, UNEP-WCMC</p>\n<p>Protected area data are aggregated globally into the WDPA by UNEP-WCMC, according to the mandate for production of the United Nations List of Protected Areas (Deguignet et al. 2014). They are disseminated through Protected Planet, which is jointly managed by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN and its World Commission on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC 2016). KBAs data are aggregated into the WDKBA, managed by BirdLife International (2019). </p>", "old": "<p>UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and BirdLife International</p>\n<p>Protected area data are aggregated globally into the World Database on Protected Areas by the UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, according to the mandate for production of the United Nations List of Protected Areas (Deguignet et al. 2014). They are disseminated through Protected Planet, which is jointly managed by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN and its World Commission on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC 2016). Key Biodiversity Areas data are aggregated into the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas, managed by BirdLife International (2019). </p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684783, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684783/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679614/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197929+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h1> Поставщики данных </h1>\n<p> Данные по охраняемым территориям собираются министерствами окружающей среды и другими министерствами, ответственными за наделение полномочиями и поддержание охраняемых территорий. Ключевые области сохранения биоразнообразия определяются в национальном масштабе путем реализации мероприятий с участием многих заинтересованных сторон, следуя стандартным критериям и пороговым значениям.</p>", "old": "<h1> Поставщики данных </h1>\n<p> Данные по охраняемым территориям собираются министерствами окружающей среды и другими министерствами, ответственными за наделение полномочиями и поддержание охраняемых территорий. Ключевые области сохранения биоразнообразия определяются в национальном масштабе путем реализации мероприятий с участием многих заинтересованных сторон, следуя стандартным критериям и пороговым значениям.</p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>Protected area data are compiled by ministries of environment and other ministries responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas. KBAs are identified at national scales through multi-stakeholder processes, following established processes and standard criteria and thresholds (see above for details).</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684782, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684782/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679614/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197821+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>Protected area data are compiled by ministries of environment and other ministries responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas. KBAs are identified at national scales through multi-stakeholder processes, following established processes and standard criteria and thresholds (see above for details).</p>", "old": "<p>Protected area data are compiled by ministries of environment and other ministries responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas. Key Biodiversity Areas are identified at national scales through multi-stakeholder processes, following established processes and standard criteria and thresholds (see above for details).</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684781, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684781/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679611/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197709+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h2> Выпуск данных: </h2>\n<p> Ожидается, что показатель охвата охраняемых территорий, важных с точки зрения сохранения биоразнообразия, будет публиковаться ежегодно. </p>", "old": "<h2> Выпуск данных: </h2>\n<p> Ожидается, что показатель охвата охраняемых территорий, важных с точки зрения сохранения биоразнообразия, будет публиковаться ежегодно. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>The indicator of protected area coverage of important sites for biodiversity is updated each November-December using the latest versions of the datasets on protected areas, OECMs and KBAs.</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684780, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684780/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679611/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197599+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>The indicator of protected area coverage of important sites for biodiversity is updated each November-December using the latest versions of the datasets on protected areas, OECMs and KBAs.</p>", "old": "<p>The indicator of protected area coverage of important sites for biodiversity is updated each November-December using the latest versions of the datasets on protected areas, OECMs and Key Biodiversity Areas.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684779, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684779/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679609/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197461+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h1> Календарь</h1>\n<h2> Сбор данных:</h2>\n<p>Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) составляет Список ООН по охраняемым территориям каждые 5-10 лет на основе информации, предоставляемой национальными министерствами / агентствами. В период между составлением Списков Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) тесно сотрудничают с национальными министерствами / агентствами и НПО, ответственными за наделение полномочиями и поддержание охраняемых территорий, постоянно обновляя Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям по мере появления новых данных. Всемирная база данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия также постоянно обновляется по мере поступления новых национальных данных. </p>", "old": "<h1> Календарь</h1>\n<h2> Сбор данных:</h2>\n<p>Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) составляет Список ООН по охраняемым территориям каждые 5-10 лет на основе информации, предоставляемой национальными министерствами / агентствами. В период между составлением Списков Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) тесно сотрудничают с национальными министерствами / агентствами и НПО, ответственными за наделение полномочиями и поддержание охраняемых территорий, постоянно обновляя Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям по мере появления новых данных. Всемирная база данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия также постоянно обновляется по мере поступления новых национальных данных. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>UNEP-WCMC produces the UN List of Protected Areas every 5–10 years, based on information provided by national ministries/agencies. In the intervening period between compilations of UN Lists, UNEP-WCMC works closely with national ministries/agencies and NGOs responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas, continually updating the WDPA as new data become available. The WDOECM is also updated on an ongoing basis. The WDKBA is also updated on an ongoing basis with updates currently released twice a year, as new national data are submitted.</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684778, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684778/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679609/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197336+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>UNEP-WCMC produces the UN List of Protected Areas every 5–10 years, based on information provided by national ministries/agencies. In the intervening period between compilations of UN Lists, UNEP-WCMC works closely with national ministries/agencies and NGOs responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas, continually updating the WDPA as new data become available. The WDOECM is also updated on an ongoing basis. The WDKBA is also updated on an ongoing basis with updates currently released twice a year, as new national data are submitted.</p>", "old": "<p>UNEP-WCMC produces the UN List of Protected Areas every 5–10 years, based on information provided by national ministries/agencies. In the intervening period between compilations of UN Lists, UNEP-WCMC works closely with national ministries/agencies and NGOs responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas, continually updating the WDPA as new data become available. The World Database of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures is also updated on an ongoing basis. The World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas is also updated on an ongoing basis with updates currently released twice a year, as new national data are submitted.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684777, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684777/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679607/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197214+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h2> Процесс сбора: </h2>\n<p> См. информацию в других разделах. </p>", "old": "<h2> Процесс сбора: </h2>\n<p> См. информацию в других разделах. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>See information under other sections, and detailed information on the process by which KBAs are identified at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating\">www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating</a>. Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>The KBA identification process is highly inclusive and consultative: anyone with data on the biodiversity importance of a site may propose it as a KBA if it meets the <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-048.pdf\">KBA criteria</a>, and consultation with stakeholders at the national level (both non-governmental and governmental organisations) is required during the proposal process. Any site proposal must undergo independent review. This is followed by the official site nomination with full documentation meeting the Documentation Standards for KBAs. Sites confirmed by the KBA Secretariat to qualify as KBAs are then published on the KBA Website.</p>\n<p>Submission of proposals for KBAs to the WDKBA follows a systematic review process to ensure that the KBA criteria have been applied correctly and that the sites can be recognised as important for the global persistence of biodiversity. Regional Focal Points have been appointed to help KBA proposers develop proposals and then ensure they are reviewed independently. Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites has been published to help guide proposers through the development of proposals and the review process, highlighting where they can obtain help in making a proposal. </p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684776, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684776/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679607/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197119+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>See information under other sections, and detailed information on the process by which KBAs are identified at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating\">www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating</a>. Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>The KBA identification process is highly inclusive and consultative: anyone with data on the biodiversity importance of a site may propose it as a KBA if it meets the <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-048.pdf\">KBA criteria</a>, and consultation with stakeholders at the national level (both non-governmental and governmental organisations) is required during the proposal process. Any site proposal must undergo independent review. This is followed by the official site nomination with full documentation meeting the Documentation Standards for KBAs. Sites confirmed by the KBA Secretariat to qualify as KBAs are then published on the KBA Website.</p>\n<p>Submission of proposals for KBAs to the WDKBA follows a systematic review process to ensure that the KBA criteria have been applied correctly and that the sites can be recognised as important for the global persistence of biodiversity. Regional Focal Points have been appointed to help KBA proposers develop proposals and then ensure they are reviewed independently. Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites has been published to help guide proposers through the development of proposals and the review process, highlighting where they can obtain help in making a proposal. </p>", "old": "<p>See information under other sections, and detailed information on the process by which Key Biodiversity Areas are identified at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating\">www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating</a>. Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>The KBA identification process is highly inclusive and consultative. Anyone with appropriate data may propose a site. Consultation with stakeholders at the national level (both non-governmental and governmental organisations) is required during the proposal process. Any site proposal must undergo independent review. This is followed by the official site nomination with full documentation meeting the Documentation Standards for KBAs. Sites confirmed by the KBA Secretariat to qualify as KBAs are then published on the KBA Website.</p>\n<p>Submission of proposals for KBAs to the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas follows a systematic review process to ensure that the KBA criteria have been applied correctly and that the sites can be recognised as important for the global persistence of biodiversity. Regional Focal Points have been appointed to help KBA proposers develop proposals and then ensure they are reviewed independently. Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites has been published to help guide proposers through the development of proposals and the review process, highlighting where they can obtain help in making a proposal. </p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684775, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684775/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679603/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.197004+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h1> Источники данных </h1>\n<h2> Описание: </h2>\n<p> Данные по охраняемым территориям составляются министерствами окружающей среды и другими министерствами, ответственными за наделение полномочиями и содержание охраняемых территорий. Данные по охраняемым территориям для объектов, уполномоченных в соответствии с Рамсарской конвенцией и Конвенцией всемирного наследия ЮНЕСКО, собираются секретариатами соответствующих международных конвенций. Данные по охраняемым территориям агрегируются на глобальном уровне во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы ООН в соответствии с полномочиями по составлению Списка охраняемых территорий Организации Объединенных Наций (Deguignet et al. 2014). Они распространяются через визуальный интерфейс Защищенная планета <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/\">http://www.protectedplanet.net,</a> которым совместно управляют Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы (UNEP-WCMC) и Международный союз охраны природы (МСОП), а также входящая в него Всемирная комиссия по охраняемым территориям (UNEP-WCMC 2016). </p>\n<p> Ключевые территории сохранения биоразнообразия определяются в национальном масштабе в ходе процессов с участием многих заинтересованных сторон, следуя стандартным критериям и пороговым значениям. Данные по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия объединены во всемирную базу данных Ключевые территории сохранения биоразнообразия, расположенную по адресу <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\"> http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/,</a> находящуюся под управлением Международной ассоциации по защите птиц. В частности, данные по важным орнитологическим территориям и территориям сохранения биоразнообразия доступны в Интернете по адресу <a href=\"http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search\"> http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search </a>, а данные по территориям Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения доступны в Интернете по адресу <a-href=\"https://zeroextinction.org\">https://zeroextinction.org</a>. Оба набора данных вместе с ключевыми территориями сохранения биоразнообразия, идентифицированными с помощью других процессов, доступны во <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\"> Всемирной базе данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия </a>, а также вместе со Всемирной базой данных по охраняемым территориям распространяются через <a href=\"https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/login\">Инструмент интегрированной оценки биоразнообразия для исследований и планирования мероприятий по сохранению биоразнообразия</a>. </p>", "old": "<h1> Источники данных </h1>\n<h2> Описание: </h2>\n<p> Данные по охраняемым территориям составляются министерствами окружающей среды и другими министерствами, ответственными за наделение полномочиями и содержание охраняемых территорий. Данные по охраняемым территориям для объектов, уполномоченных в соответствии с Рамсарской конвенцией и Конвенцией всемирного наследия ЮНЕСКО, собираются секретариатами соответствующих международных конвенций. Данные по охраняемым территориям агрегируются на глобальном уровне во Всемирную базу данных по охраняемым территориям Всемирным центром мониторинга охраны природы ООН в соответствии с полномочиями по составлению Списка охраняемых территорий Организации Объединенных Наций (Deguignet et al. 2014). Они распространяются через визуальный интерфейс Защищенная планета <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/\">http://www.protectedplanet.net,</a> которым совместно управляют Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы (UNEP-WCMC) и Международный союз охраны природы (МСОП), а также входящая в него Всемирная комиссия по охраняемым территориям (UNEP-WCMC 2016). </p>\n<p> Ключевые территории сохранения биоразнообразия определяются в национальном масштабе в ходе процессов с участием многих заинтересованных сторон, следуя стандартным критериям и пороговым значениям. Данные по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия объединены во всемирную базу данных Ключевые территории сохранения биоразнообразия, расположенную по адресу <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\"> http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/,</a> находящуюся под управлением Международной ассоциации по защите птиц. В частности, данные по важным орнитологическим территориям и территориям сохранения биоразнообразия доступны в Интернете по адресу <a href=\"http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search\"> http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search </a>, а данные по территориям Альянса за предотвращение полного исчезновения доступны в Интернете по адресу <a-href=\"https://zeroextinction.org\">https://zeroextinction.org</a>. Оба набора данных вместе с ключевыми территориями сохранения биоразнообразия, идентифицированными с помощью других процессов, доступны во <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\"> Всемирной базе данных по ключевым территориям сохранения биоразнообразия </a>, а также вместе со Всемирной базой данных по охраняемым территориям распространяются через <a href=\"https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/login\">Инструмент интегрированной оценки биоразнообразия для исследований и планирования мероприятий по сохранению биоразнообразия</a>. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>Protected area data are compiled by ministries of environment and other ministries responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas. Protected Areas data for sites designated under the Ramsar Convention and the UNESCO World Heritage Convention are collected through the relevant convention international secretariats. Protected area data are aggregated globally into the WDPA by UNEP-WCMC, according to the mandate for production of the United Nations List of Protected Areas (Deguignet et al. 2014). They are disseminated through <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/\">Protected Planet</a>, which is jointly managed by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN and its World Commission on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC 2016).</p>\n<p>Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) are collated in the WDOECM. This database can be regarded as a sister database to the WDPA as it is also hosted on Protected Planet. Furthermore, the databases share many of the same fields and have an almost identical workflow; differing only in what they list. OECMs are a quickly evolving area of work, as such for the latest information on OECMs and the WDOECM please contact UNEP-WCMC. </p>\n<p>KBAs are identified at national scales through multi-stakeholder processes, following standard criteria and thresholds. KBAs data are aggregated into the <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">World Database on </a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">KBAs</a>, managed by BirdLife International. </p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684774, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684774/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679603/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.196895+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>Protected area data are compiled by ministries of environment and other ministries responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas. Protected Areas data for sites designated under the Ramsar Convention and the UNESCO World Heritage Convention are collected through the relevant convention international secretariats. Protected area data are aggregated globally into the WDPA by UNEP-WCMC, according to the mandate for production of the United Nations List of Protected Areas (Deguignet et al. 2014). They are disseminated through <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/\">Protected Planet</a>, which is jointly managed by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN and its World Commission on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC 2016).</p>\n<p>Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) are collated in the WDOECM. This database can be regarded as a sister database to the WDPA as it is also hosted on Protected Planet. Furthermore, the databases share many of the same fields and have an almost identical workflow; differing only in what they list. OECMs are a quickly evolving area of work, as such for the latest information on OECMs and the WDOECM please contact UNEP-WCMC. </p>\n<p>KBAs are identified at national scales through multi-stakeholder processes, following standard criteria and thresholds. KBAs data are aggregated into the <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">World Database on </a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">KBAs</a>, managed by BirdLife International. </p>", "old": "<p>Protected area data are compiled by ministries of environment and other ministries responsible for the designation and maintenance of protected areas. Protected Areas data for sites designated under the Ramsar Convention and the UNESCO World Heritage Convention are collected through the relevant convention international secretariats. Protected area data are aggregated globally into the World Database on Protected Areas by the UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, according to the mandate for production of the United Nations List of Protected Areas (Deguignet et al. 2014). They are disseminated through <a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/\">Protected Planet</a>, which is jointly managed by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN and its World Commission on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC 2016).</p>\n<p>OECMs are collated in the World Database of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WDOECM). This database can be regarded as a sister database to the WDPA as it is also hosted on Protected Planet. Furthermore, the databases share many of the same fields and have an almost identical workflow; differing only in what they list. OECMs are a quickly evolving area of work, as such for the latest information on OECMs and the WDOECM please contact UNEP-WCMC. </p>\n<p>KBAs are identified at national scales through multi-stakeholder processes, following standard criteria and thresholds. Key Biodiversity Areas data are aggregated into the <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">World Database on </a></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/\">Key Biodiversity Areas</a>, managed by BirdLife International. </p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684773, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684773/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798206/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.196762+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>Protected Areas are defined as described above by IUCN (IUCN; Dudley 2008) and documented in the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). (<a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net\">www.protectedplanet.net</a>).</p>\n<p>Importantly, a variety of specific management objectives are recognised within this definition, spanning conservation, restoration, and sustainable use:</p>\n<p>- Category Ia: Strict nature reserve</p>\n<p>- Category Ib: Wilderness area</p>\n<p>- Category II: National park</p>\n<p>- Category III: Natural monument or feature</p>\n<p>- Category IV: Habitat/species management area</p>\n<p>- Category V: Protected landscape/seascape</p>\n<p>- Category VI: Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources</p>\n<p>The status "designated" is attributed to a protected area when the corresponding authority, according to national legislation or common practice (e.g., by means of an executive decree or the like), officially endorses a document of designation. The designation must be made for the purpose of biodiversity conservation, not de facto protection arising because of some other activity (e.g., military).</p>\n<p>Data on protected areas are managed in the WDPA (www.protectedplanet.net) by UNEP-WCMC.</p>\n<p>OECMs are defined as described above by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD 2018) and documented in the World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WDOECM) (<a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/oecms\">www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/oecms</a>).</p>\n<p>OECMs are defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as “A geographically defined area other than a Protected Area, which is governed and managed in ways that achieve positive and sustained long-term outcomes for the in-situ conservation of biodiversity, with associated ecosystem functions and services and where applicable, cultural, spiritual, socio–economic, and other locally relevant values” (CBD, 2018). Data on OECMs are managed in the WDOECM (<a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/oecms\">www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/oecms</a>) by UNEP-WCMC.</p>\n<p>Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are defined as described below by IUCN (2016) and documented in the World Database of KBAs (WDKBA) (www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-data).</p>\n<p>Sites contributing significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity are identified following globally criteria set out in A Global Standard for the Identification of KBAs (IUCN 2016) applied at national levels. KBAs encompass (a) Important Bird & Biodiversity Areas, that is, sites contributing significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity, identified using data on birds, of which more than13,000 sites in total have been identified from all of the world’s countries (BirdLife International 2014, Donald et al. 2018); (b) Alliance for Zero Extinction sites (Ricketts et al. 2005), that is, sites holding effectively the entire population of at least one species assessed as Critically Endangered or Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, of which 853 sites have been identified for 1,483 species of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, freshwater crustaceans, reef-building corals, conifers, cycads and other taxa; (c) KBAs identified under an earlier version of the KBA criteria (Langhammer et al. 2007), including those identified in Ecosystem Hotspot Profiles developed with support of the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. These three subsets are being reassessed using the Global Standard, which unifies these approaches along with other mechanisms for identification of important sites for other species and ecosystems (IUCN 2016).</p>\n<p>Data on KBAs are managed in the WDKBA (www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-data) by BirdLife International on behalf of the KBA Partnership.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684772, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684772/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798205/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.196630+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>Percent (%) (Mean percentage of each mountain Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) covered by (i.e. overlapping with) protected areas and/or OECMs.)</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684771, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684771/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679601/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.196486+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h1> Понятия и определения </h1>\n<h2> Определение: </h2>\n<p> Этот показатель \"Доля охраняемых районов среди важных для горного биоразнообразия участков\" отражает временные тенденции в средней процентной доле каждого важного для горного биоразнообразия участка (т. е. вносящих значительный вклад в глобальное сохранение биоразнообразия), который покрывается уполномоченными охраняемыми территориями. </p>", "old": "<h1> Понятия и определения </h1>\n<h2> Определение: </h2>\n<p> Этот показатель \"Доля охраняемых районов среди важных для горного биоразнообразия участков\" отражает временные тенденции в средней процентной доле каждого важного для горного биоразнообразия участка (т. е. вносящих значительный вклад в глобальное сохранение биоразнообразия), который покрывается уполномоченными охраняемыми территориями. </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p><strong>Definition:</strong></p>\n<p>The indicator Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity shows temporal trends in the mean percentage of each important site for mountain biodiversity (i.e., those that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity) that is covered by designated protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs).</p>\n<p><strong>Concepts:</strong></p>\n<p>Protected areas, as defined by the IUCN (IUCN; Dudley 2008), are clearly defined geographical spaces, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. </p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684770, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684770/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679601/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.196353+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p><strong>Definition:</strong></p>\n<p>The indicator Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity shows temporal trends in the mean percentage of each important site for mountain biodiversity (i.e., those that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity) that is covered by designated protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs).</p>\n<p><strong>Concepts:</strong></p>\n<p>Protected areas, as defined by the IUCN (IUCN; Dudley 2008), are clearly defined geographical spaces, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. </p>", "old": "<p><strong>Definition:</strong></p>\n<p>The indicator Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity shows temporal trends in the mean percentage of each important site for mountain biodiversity (i.e., those that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity) that is covered by designated protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs).</p>\n<p><strong>Concepts:</strong></p>\n<p>Protected areas, as defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN; Dudley 2008), are clearly defined geographical spaces, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. Importantly, a variety of specific management objectives are recognised within this definition, spanning conservation, restoration, and sustainable use:</p>\n<p>- Category Ia: Strict nature reserve</p>\n<p>- Category Ib: Wilderness area</p>\n<p>- Category II: National park</p>\n<p>- Category III: Natural monument or feature</p>\n<p>- Category IV: Habitat/species management area</p>\n<p>- Category V: Protected landscape/seascape</p>\n<p>- Category VI: Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources</p>\n<p>The status "designated" is attributed to a protected area when the corresponding authority, according to national legislation or common practice (e.g., by means of an executive decree or the like), officially endorses a document of designation. The designation must be made for the purpose of biodiversity conservation, not de facto protection arising because of some other activity (e.g., military).</p>\n<p>Data on protected areas are managed in the World Database on Protected Areas (www.protectedplanet.net) by the UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC).</p>\n<p>Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity as (CBD) “A geographically defined area other than a Protected Area, which is governed and managed in ways that achieve positive and sustained long-term outcomes for the in situ conservation of biodiversity, with associated ecosystem functions and services and where applicable, cultural, spiritual, socio–economic, and other locally relevant values” (CBD, 2018). Data on OECMs are managed in the World Database on OECMs (<a href=\"http://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/oecms\">www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/oecms</a>) by the UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC).</p>\n<p>Sites contributing significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity are identified following globally criteria set out in A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) (IUCN 2016) applied at national levels. Key Biodiversity Areas encompass (a) Important Bird & Biodiversity Areas, that is, sites contributing significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity, identified using data on birds, of which more than 13,000 sites in total have been identified from all of the world’s countries (BirdLife International 2014, Donald et al. 2018); (b) Alliance for Zero Extinction sites (Ricketts et al. 2005), that is, sites holding effectively the entire population of at least one species assessed as Critically Endangered or Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, of which 853 sites have been identified for 1,483 species of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, freshwater crustaceans, reef-building corals, conifers, cycads and other taxa; (c) Key Biodiversity Areas identified under an earlier version of the Key Biodiversity Area criteria (Langhammer et al. 2007), including those identified in Ecosystem Hotspot Profiles developed with support of the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. These three subsets are being reassessed using the Global Standard, which unifies these approaches along with other mechanisms for identification of important sites for other species and ecosystems (IUCN 2016).</p>\n<p>Data on KBAs are managed in the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas (www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-data) by BirdLife International on behalf of the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership.</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684769, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684769/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798204/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.196213+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>BirdLife International (BLI)</p>\n<p>International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)</p>\n<p>UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684768, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684768/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679599/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.196044+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<h1> Институциональная информация </h1>\n<h2> Организация (и): </h2>\n<p>Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) </p>\n<p>Международная ассоциация по защите птиц (BLI) </p>\n<p> Международный союз охраны природы (МСОП) </p>", "old": "<h1> Институциональная информация </h1>\n<h2> Организация (и): </h2>\n<p>Программа ООН по окружающей среде - Всемирный центр мониторинга охраны природы ООН (UNEP-WCMC) </p>\n<p>Международная ассоциация по защите птиц (BLI) </p>\n<p> Международный союз охраны природы (МСОП) </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "<p>BirdLife International (BLI)</p>\n<p>International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)</p>\n<p>UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)</p>\n<p>UN Environment</p>", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684767, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684767/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679599/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.195902+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "<p>BirdLife International (BLI)</p>\n<p>International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)</p>\n<p>UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)</p>\n<p>UN Environment</p>", "old": "<p>UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)</p>\n<p>BirdLife International (BLI)</p>\n<p>International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684766, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684766/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798203/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.195736+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>Other relevant indicators include:</p>\n<p>SDG 14.5.1 Coverage of protected areas in relation to marine areas.</p>\n<p>SDG 15.1.2 Proportion of important sites for terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity that are covered by protected areas, by ecosystem type.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684765, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684765/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679598/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.195579+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "<p> Последнее обновление: 12 февраля 2020 года </p>", "old": "<p> Последнее обновление: 12 февраля 2020 года </p>", "details": { "state": 10, "source": "2022-07-07", "old_state": 10 }, "id": 47684764, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684764/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/29679598/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/ru/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:09.195429+01:00", "action": 30, "target": "2022-07-07", "old": "<p>2021-07-01</p>", "details": {}, "id": 47684763, "action_name": "Source string changed", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684763/?format=api" }, { "unit": null, "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.582604+01:00", "action": 0, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "reason": "content changed", "filename": "translations-metadata/en/15-4-1.yml" }, "id": 47684762, "action_name": "Resource updated", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684762/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/38500668/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.582128+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p><strong>URL:</strong></p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.unep-wcmc.org/\">http://www.unep-wcmc.org/</a> ; <a href=\"http://www.birdlife.org/\">http://www.birdlife.org/</a> ; <a href=\"http://www.iucn.org/\">http://www.iucn.org/</a> </p>\n<p><strong>References:</strong></p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Available at datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.</p>\n<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Available at http://keybiodiversityareas.org/sites/search.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3–12. Available </p>\n<p>from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75.</p>\n<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497–522 in Durán y Lalaguna, P., Díaz Barrado, C.M. & Fernández Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Available from: https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168. Available from https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1187512.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529.</p>\n<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329–337. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full.</p>\n<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/\">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a>.</p>\n<p>CBD (2018). Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. Decision 14/8 adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020a). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available from https://www.cbd.int/gbo5/. </p>\n<p>CBD (2020b). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Scientific and technical information to support the review of the updated Goals and Targets, and related indicators and baselines. Document CBD/SBSTTA/24/3. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/705d/6b4b/a1a463c1b19392bde6fa08f3/sbstta-24-03-en.pdf.</p>\n<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443–445. Available from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.short.</p>\n<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322.</p>\n<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392–402. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract.</p>\n<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177–198.</p>\n<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243.</p>\n<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity Areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969–983. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract.</p>\n<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110–1118. Available from http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short.</p>\n<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733–2744. Available from </p>\n<p>https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779.</p>\n<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from www.gadm.org.</p>\n<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046.</p>\n<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167–179. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298.</p>\n<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259.</p>\n<p>IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.</p>\n<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111–128. Available from http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf.</p>\n<p>KBA Secretariat (2019). Key Biodiversity Areas Proposal Process: Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites. Version 1.0. Prepared by the KBA Secretariat and KBA Committee of the KBA Partnership. Cambridge, UK. Available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. </p>\n<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256–261. Available from </p>\n<p>http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short.</p>\n<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055.</p>\n<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698. Available from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-</p>\n<p>9564-5#page-1.</p>\n<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383–386. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html.</p>\n<p>NOLTE, C. & AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155–165. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract.</p>\n<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda’s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133–138. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412.</p>\n<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497–18501. Available from http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short.</p>\n<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html.</p>\n<p>RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978–2983. Available from </p>\n<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454.</p>\n<p>SIMKINS, A.T., PEARMAIN, E.J., & DIAS, M.P. (2020). Code (and documentation) for calculating the protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas. <a href=\"https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap\">https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap</a>. </p>\n<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241–244. Available from https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1257484.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from <a href=\"http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual\">http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual</a>.</p>\n<p>UNEP-WCMC & IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://www.protectedplanet.net.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684761, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684761/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/38500667/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.581849+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>\n<p>National processes provide the data that are incorporated into the WDPA, the WDOECM, and the World Database of KBAs, so there are very few discrepancies between national indicators and the global one. One minor source of difference is that the WDPA incorporates internationally-designated protected areas (e.g., UNESCO World Heritage sites, Ramsar sites, etc), a few of which are not considered by their sovereign nations to be protected areas. </p>\n<p>Note that because countries do not submit comprehensive data on degazetted protected areas to the WDPA, earlier values of the indictor may marginally underestimate coverage. Furthermore, there is also a lag between the point at which a protected area is designated on the ground and the point at which it is reported to the WDPA. As such, current or recent coverage may also be underestimated.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684760, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684760/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798201/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.581583+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>High.</p>\n<p>Each custodian agency is responsible for quality management of their own database.<br>Quality assessment of the indicator is shared between the indicator custodian agencies.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684759, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684759/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/38500665/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.581274+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>Information on the process of how protected area data are collected, standardised and published is available in the WDPA User Manual at: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a> which is available in English, French and Spanish. Specific guidance is provided at <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a> on, for example, predefined fields or look up tables in the WDPA: <a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, how WDPA records are coded how international designations and regional designations data is collected, how regularly is the database updated, and how to perform protected areas coverage statistics. </p>\n<p>Data quality in the process of identifying KBAs is ensured through processes established by the <a href=\"https://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/programme/partnership\">KBA Partnership</a> and KBA Secretariat. Data quality is ensured through wide stakeholder engagement in the KBA proposal process, data checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominations by the KBA Secretariat. </p>\n<p>In addition, the Chairs of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and World Commission on Protected Areas (both of whom are elected by the IUCN Membership of governments and non-governmental organisations), appoint the Chair of an independent KBA Standards and Appeals Committee, which ensures the correct application of the Global Standard for the identification of KBA, and oversees a formal Procedure for handling of appeals against the identification of KBAs (see http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/1b388c918e14c5f4c3d7a0237eb0d366).</p>\n<p>Before submission to the UN SDG Indicators database the annually updated indicators of coverage of KBAs by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are incorporated into updated Country Profiles on the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (<a href=\"https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles\">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>) and then sent for consultation to National Focal Points of the Convention on Biological Diversity (<a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml\">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), National Statistics Offices SDG Representatives and UN Permanent Missions (Geneva) representatives. </p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684758, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684758/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/43798200/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.580990+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>For protected areas and OECMs, please see the section on validation. Ensuring the WDPA and WDOECM remain an accurate and true depiction of reality is a never-ending task; however, over time the quality of the data (e.g. the proportion of sites with defined boundaries) is increasing.</p>\n<p>For KBAs, see above and below, plus the guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs which is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. Data quality is ensured through wide stakeholder engagement in the KBA proposal process, data checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominations by the KBAs Secretariat. Furthermore, an independent KBA Standards and Appeals Committee ensures the correct application of the Global Standard for the identification of KBAs, and oversees a formal Procedure for handling of appeals against the identification of KBAs (see http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/1b388c918e14c5f4c3d7a0237eb0d366).</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684757, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684757/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/38500664/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.580615+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p><strong><em>PAs</em></strong></p>\n<p>Data on protected areas are submitted by government agencies to the WDPA and disseminated through Protected Planet. The WDPA has its origins in a 1959 UN mandate when the United Nations Economic and Social Council called for a list of national parks and equivalent reserves Resolution 713 (XXVIII). </p>\n<p>Protected areas data are therefore compiled directly from government agencies, regional hubs and other authoritative sources in the absence of a government source. All records have a unique metadata identifier (MetadataID) which links the spatial database to the Source table where all sources are described. The data is collated and standardised following the WDPA Data Standards and validated with the source. The process of collation, validation and publication of data as well as protocols and the WDPA data standards are regularly updated in the WDPA User Manual (<a href=\"https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual\">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a>) made available through www.protectedplanet.net where all spatial data and the Source table are also published every month and can be downloaded. The WDPA User Manual (published in English, Spanish, and French) provides guidance to countries on how to submit protected areas data to the WDPA, the benefits of providing such data, and the data standards and quality checks that are performed. </p>\n<p><strong><em>OECMS</em></strong></p>\n<p>Guiding principles, common characteristics and criteria for identification of OECMs are available in CBD (2018) at <a href=\"https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf\">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>.</p>\n<p>Guidance on recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures is available in IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019) at: <a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/48773</a>.</p>\n<p><strong><em>KBAs</em></strong></p>\n<p>The “Global Standard for the Identification of KBAs” (<a href=\"https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259\">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>) comprises the standard recommendations available to countries in the identification of KBAs. Guidelines for using A global standard for the identification of KBAs are available at https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/49131.</p>\n<p>Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming KBAs is available in KBA Secretariat (2019) at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>.</p>\n<p>A summary of the process by which KBAs are identified is available at <a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating\">www.keybiodiversityareas.org/working-with-kbas/proposing-updating</a>.</p>\n<p>The KBA identification process is highly inclusive, consultative and nationally driven. Anyone with appropriate data may propose a site as a KBA, although consultation with relevant stakeholders at the local and national level is required when identifying the site and needs to be documented in the proposal. In order to propose a site as a KBA, a proposer must apply the KBA criteria to data on biodiversity elements (species and ecosystems) at the site. Associated with the proposal process is the need to delineate the site accurately so that its boundaries are clear. Although anyone with appropriate scientific data may propose a site to qualify as a KBA, wide consultation with stakeholders at the national level (both non-governmental and governmental organizations) is required during the proposal process. The formal proposal is then made using a proposal process that ensures there is an independent review of the proposal before a site is incorporated in the WDKBA. This is important given that KBA status of a site may lead to changes in actions of governments, private sector companies and other institutions following consultation as appropriate. </p>\n<p>KBA identification builds off the existing network of KBAs, including those identified as (a) Important Bird & Biodiversity Areas through the BirdLife Partnership of over 115 national organisations (https://www.birdlife.org/who-we-are/), (b) Alliance for Zero Extinction sites by 93 national and international organisations in the Alliance (<a href=\"http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html\">http://www.zeroextinction.org/partners.html</a>), and (c) other KBAs by civil society organisations supported by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund in developing ecosystem profiles, named in each of the profiles listed here (<a href=\"http://www.cepf.net\">http://www.cepf.net</a> ), with new data strengthening and expanding expand the network of these sites.</p>\n<p>The main steps of the KBA identification process are the following: </p>\n<ol>\n <li>submission of Expressions of Intent to identify a KBA to Regional Focal Points; </li>\n <li>Proposal Development process, in which proposers compile relevant data and documentation and consult national experts, including organizations that have already identified KBAs in the country, either through national KBA Coordination Groups or independently;</li>\n <li>review of proposed KBAs by Independent Expert Reviewers, verifying the accuracy of information within their area of expertise; and</li>\n <li>a Site Nomination phase comprising the submission of all the relevant documentation for verification by the KBAs Secretariat. Sites confirmed by the KBAs Secretariat to qualify as KBAs are then published on the KBAs website (<a href=\"http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home\">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>).</li>\n</ol>\n<p>Once a KBA is identified, monitoring of its qualifying features and its conservation status is important. Proposers, reviewers and those undertaking monitoring can join the KBAs Community to exchange their experiences, case studies and best practice examples.</p>\n<p>The R code for calculating protected area coverage of KBAs is documented in Simkins et al. (2020). </p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684756, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684756/?format=api" }, { "unit": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/units/38500663/?format=api", "component": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/components/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/?format=api", "translation": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/translations/sdg-metadata/15-4-1/pt/?format=api", "user": null, "author": null, "timestamp": "2023-02-07T20:08:08.580348+01:00", "action": 59, "target": "", "old": "", "details": { "state": 0, "source": "<p>Regional indices are calculated as the mean percentage of each KBA in the region covered by (i.e. overlapping with) protected areas and/or OECMs: in other words, the percentage of each KBA covered by these designations, averaged over all KBAs in the particular region.</p>", "old_state": 0 }, "id": 47684755, "action_name": "String updated in the repository", "url": "https://hosted.weblate.org/api/changes/47684755/?format=api" } ] }