Translation status

32 Strings 9%
Browse Translate
5,590 Words 1%
45,605 Characters 1%

Strings status

Strings Words Characters
32 5,590 45,605
All strings Browse Translate Zen
3 55 379
Translated strings Browse Translate Zen
3 55 379
Strings waiting for review Browse Translate Zen
29 5,535 45,226
Unfinished strings Browse Translate Zen
9 1,017 8,002
Untranslated strings Browse Translate Zen
20 4,518 37,224
Strings marked for edit Browse Translate Zen
29 5,535 45,226
Unfinished strings without suggestions Browse Translate Zen
23 4,731 38,963
Strings with any failing checks Browse Translate Zen
1 101 690
Failing check: Double space Browse Translate Zen
5 238 1,945
Failing check: Inconsistent Browse Translate Zen
17 4,101 33,712
Failing check: Mismatching line breaks Browse Translate Zen
2 1,240 12,459
Failing check: XML syntax Browse Translate Zen
16 3,253 24,559
Failing check: XML markup Browse Translate Zen

Other components

Component Approved Translated Unfinished Unfinished words Unfinished characters Untranslated Checks Suggestions Comments
10-1-1 MIT 0% 12% 28 2,183 17,213 24 0 0 0
10-2-1 MIT 0% 9% 29 1,879 13,743 27 0 0 0
10-3-1 MIT 0% 8% 22 1,967 15,017 22 0 0 0
10-4-1 MIT 0% 21% 25 2,129 18,176 21 0 0 0
10-4-2 MIT 0% 9% 29 3,461 469,650 29 0 0 0
10-5-1 MIT 0% 6% 28 1,975 13,545 7 23 0 0
10-6-1 MIT 0% 10% 25 1,267 11,344 12 19 0 0
10-7-1 MIT 0% 0% 32 2,606 27,994 31 0 0 0
10-7-2 MIT 0% 6% 30 3,656 791,262 29 0 0 0
10-7-3 MIT 0% 0% 31 4,636 36,366 30 0 0 0
Browse all components

Overview

Project website github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Instructions for translators

This project is limited to Russian translation only, for now.

More detailed instructions to come.
Project maintainers User avatar brockfanning
Translation license MIT License
Translation process
  • Translations can be made directly.
  • Translation suggestions are turned off.
  • Translations are reviewed by dedicated reviewers.
  • Any authenticated user can contribute.
  • The translation uses monolingual files.
  • The translation base language can not be edited.
Source code repository https://github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Repository branch master
Last remote commit Merge pull request #542 from weblate/weblate-sdg-metadata-1-1-1a 85d59a4a6e9
User avatar brockfanning authored 13 days ago
Last commit in Weblate Translated using Weblate (French) bb12e297d5e
User avatar deblsyl authored 2 years ago
Weblate repository https://hosted.weblate.org/git/sdg-metadata/1-1-1a/
File mask translations-metadata/*/14-5-1.yml
Monolingual base language file translations-metadata/en/14-5-1.yml
Translation file Download translations-metadata/fr/14-5-1.yml
Last change Aug. 17, 2022, 5:10 p.m.
Last author None
22 hours ago

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 32 5,590 45,605
Approved 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Waiting for review 9% 3 1% 55 1% 379
Translated 9% 3 1% 55 1% 379
Needs editing 62% 20 80% 4,518 81% 37,224
Read-only 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Failing checks 71% 23 84% 4,731 85% 38,963
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 28% 9 18% 1,017 17% 8,002
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 47 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

Quick numbers

5,590
Hosted words
32
Hosted strings
9%
Translated
0
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

—
Hosted words
+100%
—
Hosted strings
+100%
—
Translated
+9%
—
Contributors
—
User avatar None

Resource updated

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
The “translations-metadata/en/14-5-1.yml” file was changed. a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p><strong>URL:</strong></p>
<p>http://www.unep-wcmc.org/; http://www.birdlife.org/; http://www.iucn.org/</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>These metadata are based on http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-</p>
<p>of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx, supplemented by http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays and the references listed below.</p>
<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Available at datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.</p>
<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) World Database of KBAs. Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Available at http://keybiodiversityareas.org/sites/search.</p>
<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3&#x2013;12. Available </p>
<p>from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75.</p>
<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497&#x2013;522 in Dur&#xE1;n y Lalaguna, P., D&#xED;az Barrado, C.M. &amp; Fern&#xE1;ndez Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Available from: https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164&#x2013;1168. Available from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short.</p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529.</p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329&#x2013;337. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full.</p>
<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montr&#xE9;al, Canada. Available from <a href="https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a>.</p>
<p>CBD (2018). Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. Decision 14/8 adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at <a href="https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>. </p>
<p>CBD (2020a). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montr&#xE9;al, Canada. Available from https://www.cbd.int/gbo5/. </p>
<p>CBD (2020b). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Scientific and technical information to support the review of the updated Goals and Targets, and related indicators and baselines. Document CBD/SBSTTA/24/3. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/705d/6b4b/a1a463c1b19392bde6fa08f3/sbstta-24-03-en.pdf.</p>
<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443&#x2013;445. Available from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.short.</p>
<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322.</p>
<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392&#x2013;402. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract.</p>
<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177&#x2013;198.</p>
<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243.</p>
<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). KBAs as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969&#x2013;983. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract.</p>
<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). KBAs as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110&#x2013;1118. Available from http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short.</p>
<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733&#x2013;2744. Available from </p>
<p>http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779.</p>
<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from www.gadm.org.</p>
<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046.</p>
<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the KBA approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167&#x2013;179. Available from </p>
<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298.</p>
<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of KBAs. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259.</p>
<p>IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.</p>
<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111&#x2013;128. Available from http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf.</p>
<p>KBA Secretariat (2019). KBAs Proposal Process: Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites. Version 1.0. Prepared by the KBA Secretariat and KBA Committee of the KBA Partnership. Cambridge, UK. Available at <a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. </p>
<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the KBAs approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256&#x2013;261. Available from </p>
<p>http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short.</p>
<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of KBAs: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055.</p>
<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685&#x2013;698. Available from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-</p>
<p>9564-5#page-1.</p>
<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383&#x2013;386. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html.</p>
<p>NOLTE, C. &amp; AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155&#x2013;165. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract.</p>
<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda&#x2019;s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133&#x2013;138. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412.</p>
<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497&#x2013;18501. Available from http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short.</p>
<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640&#x2013;643. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html.</p>
<p>RODR&#xCD;GUEZ-RODR&#xCD;GUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978&#x2013;2983. Available from </p>
<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454.</p>
<p>SIMKINS, A.T., PEARMAIN, E.J., &amp; DIAS, M.P. (2020). Code (and documentation) for calculating the protected area coverage of KBAs. <a href="https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap">https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap</a>. </p>
<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241&#x2013;244. Available from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short.</p>
<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual.</p>
<p>UNEP-WCMC &amp; IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://www.protectedplanet.net.</p>
<h1>Références </h1>
<h2>URL : </h2>
<p><a href="http://www.unep-wcmc.org/">http ://www.unep-wcmc.org/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.birdlife.org/">http ://www.birdlife.org/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.iucn.org/">http ://www.iucn.org/</a></p>
<h2>Références :</h2>
<p>Ces métadonnées sont basées sur </p>
<p><a href="http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx">http ://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-</a></p>
<p><a href="http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx">of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx</a></p>
<p>complétée par <a href="http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays">http ://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays</a></p>
<p>et les références énumérées ci-dessous. </p>
<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas : a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK : BirdLife International. Disponible à <a href="http://datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.">datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA</a>.</p>
<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) <em>World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas.</em>Developed by the KBA Partnership : BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Disponible à http ://keybiodiversity areas.org/site/search.</p>
<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity : do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups ? Ostrich suppl. 15 : 3-12. Disponible</p>
<p>sur :<a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329%23.VafbVJPVq75">http ://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75</a>.</p>
<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15 : Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497-522 in Dur&#xE1;n y Lalaguna, P., D&#xED;az Barrado, C.M. &amp;Fern&#xE1;ndez Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Disponible sur : <a href="https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456">https ://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html ?pid=10008456</a></p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity : indicators of recent declines. Science 328 : 1164 à 1168. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short">http ://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short</a>.</p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3) : e32529. Disponible sur <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529">http ://journals.plos.org/plosone/article ?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529</a></p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8 : 329-337. Disponible sur <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full">http ://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full</a></p>
<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Disponible sur <a href="https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/">https ://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a></p>
<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360 : 443-445. Disponible sur <a href="http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.shor">http ://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.shor</a></p>
<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Disponible sur <a href="http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322">http ://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF ?1415613322</a></p>
<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30 : 392-402. Disponible sur <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract">http ://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract</a>.</p>
<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) : the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29 :177-198.</p>
<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Disponible sur <a href="https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243">https ://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243</a></p>
<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity Areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation : Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18 : 969 - 983. Disponible sur <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract">http ://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract</a></p>
<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54 : 1110&#x2013;1118. Disponible sur <a href="http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short">http ://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short</a></p>
<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance : progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4 : 2733&#x2013;2744. Disponible sur </p>
<p><a href="http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779">http ://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779</a>.</p>
<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.gadm.org/home" target="_blank">www.gadm.org</a>.</p>
<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard : addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11) : e112046. Disponible sur <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046">http ://journals.plos.org/plosone/article ?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046</a></p>
<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity : the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148 : 167-179. Disponible sur </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298">http ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298</a></p>
<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Disponible sur <a href="https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259">https ://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a></p>
<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change : looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20 : 111&#x2013;128. Disponible sur <a href="http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf">http ://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf</a></p>
<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57 : 256&#x2013;261. Disponible sur <a href="http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short">http ://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short</a></p>
<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas : Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Disponible sur <a href="https ://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055">https ://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055</a></p>
<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46 : 685&#x2013;698. Disponible sur http ://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5#page-1</p>
<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516 : 383&#x2013;386. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html">http ://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html</a></p>
<p>NOLTE, C.&amp;AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27 : 155&#x2013;165. Disponible sur <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract">http ://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract</a></p>
<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda&#x2019;s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125 : 133&#x2013 ;138. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412">http ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412</a></p>
<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102 : 18497&#x2013;18501. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short">http ://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short</a>.</p>
<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428 : 640&#x2013;643. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html">http ://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html</a></p>
<p>RODR&#xCD;GUEZ-RODR&#xCD;GUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains : a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144 : 2978&#x2013;2983. Available from </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454">http ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454</a></p>
<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346 : 241&#x2013;244. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short">http ://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short</a></p>
<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Disponible sur <a href="http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual">http ://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual</a>.</p>
<p>UNEP-WCMC&amp;IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Disponible sur <a href="http://www.protectedplanet.net">http ://www.protectedplanet.net</a></p>
a year ago
User avatar None

Source string changed

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p><strong>URL:</strong></p>
<p>http://www.unep-wcmc.org/; http://www.birdlife.org/; http://www.iucn.org/</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>These metadata are based on http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/7-6-Proportion-</p>
<p>of-terrestrial-and-marine-areas-protected.ashx, supplemented by http://www.bipindicators.net/paoverlays and the references listed below.</p>
<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2014). Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Available at datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/sowbpubs#IBA.</p>
<p>BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2019) World Database of Key Biodiversity AreaBAs. Developed by the KBA Partnership: BirdLife International, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Rainforest Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Conservation Society and World Wildlife Fund. September 2019 version. Available at http://keybiodiversity areas.org/sites/search.</p>
<p>BROOKS, T. et al. (2001). Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich suppl. 15: 3&#x2013;12. Available </p>
<p>from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2989/00306520109485329#.VafbVJPVq75.</p>
<p>BROOKS, T.M. et al. (2016) Goal 15: Life on land. Sustainable manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss. Pp. 497&#x2013;522 in Dur&#xE1;n y Lalaguna, P., D&#xED;az Barrado, C.M. &amp; Fern&#xE1;ndez Liesa, C.R. (eds.) International Society and Sustainable Development Goals. Editorial Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, Spain. Available from: https://www.thomsonreuters.es/es/tienda/pdp/duo.html?pid=10008456</p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164&#x2013;1168. Available from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5982/1164.short.</p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2012). Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One 7(3): e32529. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032529.</p>
<p>BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters 8: 329&#x2013;337. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12158/full.</p>
<p>CBD (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montr&#xE9;al, Canada. Available from <a href="https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/">https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/</a>.</p>
<p>CBD (2018). Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. Decision 14/8 adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at <a href="https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf">https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf</a>. </p>
<p>CBD (2020a). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montr&#xE9;al, Canada. Available from https://www.cbd.int/gbo5/. </p>
<p>CBD (2020b). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Scientific and technical information to support the review of the updated Goals and Targets, and related indicators and baselines. Document CBD/SBSTTA/24/3. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/705d/6b4b/a1a463c1b19392bde6fa08f3/sbstta-24-03-en.pdf.</p>
<p>CHAPE, S. et al. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 443&#x2013;445. Available from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/443.short.</p>
<p>DEGUIGNET, M., et al. (2014). 2014 United Nations List of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/263/original/2014_UN_List_of_Protected_Areas_EN_web.PDF?1415613322.</p>
<p>DI MARCO, M., et al. (2016). Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Biology 30: 392&#x2013;402. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12609/abstract.</p>
<p>DONALD, P. et al. (2018) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Internat. 29:177&#x2013;198.</p>
<p>DUDLEY, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9243.</p>
<p>EDGAR, G.J. et al. (2008). Key Biodiversity AreaBAs as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 969&#x2013;983. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.902/abstract.</p>
<p>EKEN, G. et al. (2004). Key biodiversity areaBAs as site conservation targets. BioScience 54: 1110&#x2013;1118. Available from http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1110.short.</p>
<p>FOSTER, M.N. et al. (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2733&#x2013;2744. Available from </p>
<p>http://www.threatenedtaxa.in/index.php/JoTT/article/view/779.</p>
<p>Global Administrative Areas (2019). GADM database of Global Administrative Areas, version 2.8. Available from www.gadm.org.</p>
<p>HAN, X. et al. (2014). A Biodiversity indicators dashboard: addressing challenges to monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets using disaggregated global data. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112046. Available from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112046.</p>
<p>HOLLAND, R.A. et al. (2012). Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity areaKBA approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148: 167&#x2013;179. Available from </p>
<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712000298.</p>
<p>IUCN (2016). A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity AreaBAs. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259.</p>
<p>IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.</p>
<p>JONAS, H.D. et al. (2014) New steps of change: looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks 20: 111&#x2013;128. Available from http://parksjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PARKS-20.2-Jonas-et-al-10.2305IUCN.CH_.2014.PARKS-20-2.HDJ_.en_.pdf.</p>
<p>KBA Secretariat (2019). Key Biodiversity AreaBAs Proposal Process: Guidance on Proposing, Reviewing, Nominating and Confirming sites. Version 1.0. Prepared by the KBA Secretariat and KBA Committee of the KBA Partnership. Cambridge, UK. Available at <a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/35687f50ac0bcad155ab17447b48885a</a>. </p>
<p>KNIGHT, A. T. et al. (2007). Improving the Key Biodiversity AreaBAs approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57: 256&#x2013;261. Available from </p>
<p>http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/256.short.</p>
<p>LANGHAMMER, P. F. et al. (2007). Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity AreaBAs: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 15. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9055.</p>
<p>LEVERINGTON, F. et al. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685&#x2013;698. Available from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-010-</p>
<p>9564-5#page-1.</p>
<p>MONTESINO POUZOLS, F., et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383&#x2013;386. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7531/abs/nature14032.html.</p>
<p>NOLTE, C. &amp; AGRAWAL, A. (2013). Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conservation Biology 27: 155&#x2013;165. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x/abstract.</p>
<p>PAIN, D.J. et al. (2005) Biodiversity representation in Uganda&#x2019;s forest IBAs. Biological Conservation 125: 133&#x2013;138. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320705001412.</p>
<p>RICKETTS, T. H. et al. (2005). Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 102: 18497&#x2013;18501. Available from http://www.pnas.org/content/102/51/18497.short.</p>
<p>RODRIGUES, A. S. L. et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640&#x2013;643. Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6983/abs/nature02422.html.</p>
<p>RODR&#xCD;GUEZ-RODR&#xCD;GUEZ, D., et al. (2011). Progress towards international targets for protected area coverage in mountains: a multi-scale assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2978&#x2013;2983. Available from </p>
<p>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320711003454.</p>
<p>SIMKINS, A.T., PEARMAIN, E.J., &amp; DIAS, M.P. (2020). Code (and documentation) for calculating the protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity AreaBAs. <a href="https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap">https://github.com/BirdLifeInternational/kba-overlap</a>. </p>
<p>TITTENSOR, D. et al. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241&#x2013;244. Available from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6206/241.short.</p>
<p>UNEP-WCMC (2019). World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.6. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://wcmc.io/WDPA_Manual.</p>
<p>UNEP-WCMC &amp; IUCN (2020). The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available from http://www.protectedplanet.net.</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>
<p>National processes provide the data that are incorporated into the WDPA, the WDOECM, and the World Database of KBAs, so there are very few discrepancies between national indicators and the global one. One minor source of difference is that the WDPA incorporates internationally-designated protected areas (e.g., UNESCO World Heritage sites, Ramsar sites, etc), a few of which are not considered by their sovereign nations to be protected areas. </p>
<p>Note that because countries do not submit comprehensive data on degazetted protected areas to the WDPA, earlier values of the indictor may marginally underestimate coverage. Furthermore, there is also a lag between the point at which a protected area is designated on the ground and the point at which it is reported to the WDPA. As such, current or recent coverage may also be underestimated.</p>
<h2>Sources de divergences :</h2>
<p>Les processus nationaux fournissent la grande majorité des données qui sont ensuite agrégées dans la Base de données mondiale sur les aires protégées et la Base de données mondiale sur les zones clés pour la biodiversité, et il y a donc très peu de différences entre les indicateurs nationaux et l'indicateur mondial. Il y a donc très peu de différences entre les indicateurs nationaux et l'indicateur mondial. Une source mineure de différence est que la Base de données mondiale sur les aires protégées incorpore les aires protégées désignées au niveau international (par exemple, les sites du patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO, les sites Ramsar, etc), dont quelques-unes ne sont pas considérées par leurs nations souveraines comme des aires protégées. </p>
<p>Notez que parce que les pays ne soumettent pas de données complètes sur les aires protégées déclassées à la WDPA, les valeurs antérieures de l'indicateur peuvent marginalement sous-estimer la couverture. En outre, il y a également un décalage entre le moment où une zone protégée est désignée sur le terrain et le moment où elle est signalée à la WDPA. De ce fait, la couverture actuelle ou récente peut également être sous-estimée.</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

Source string changed

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p><strong>Sources of discrepancies:</strong></p>
<p>National processes provide the data that are incorporated into the World Database on Protected Areas, the World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation MeasuresDPA, the WDOECM, and the World Database of Key Biodiversity AreaBAs, so there are very few discrepancies between national indicators and the global one. One minor source of difference is that the World Database on Protected AreasDPA incorporates internationally-designated protected areas (e.g., UNESCO World Heritage sites, Ramsar sites, etc), a few of which are not considered by their sovereign nations to be protected areas. </p>
<p>Note that because countries do not submit comprehensive data on degazetted protected areas to the WDPA, earlier values of the indictor may marginally underestimate coverage. Furthermore, there is also a lag between the point at which a protected area is designated on the ground and the point at which it is reported to the WDPA. As such, current or recent coverage may also be underestimated.</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p><strong>Data availability:</strong></p>
<p>This indicator has been classified by the IAEG-SDGs as Tier 1. Current data are available for all countries in the world, and these are updated on an ongoing basis. Index values for each country are available in the UN SDG Indicators Database <a href="https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/">https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/</a>. Graphs of Protected area coverage of KBAs are also available for each country in the BIP Indicators Dashboard (<a href="https://bipdashboard.natureserve.org/bip/SelectCountry.html">https://bipdashboard.natureserve.org/bip/SelectCountry.html</a>), and the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool Country Profiles (<a href="https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>).</p>
<p>Underlying data on protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are available at <a href="http://www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>. Data on KBAs are available at <a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org">www.keybiodiversityareas.org</a>. Data on subsets of KBAs are available for Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas at <a href="http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search">http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search</a> and for Alliance for Zero Extinction sites at https://zeroextinction.org.</p>
<p><strong>Disaggregation:</strong></p>
<p>Given that data for the global indicator are compiled at national levels, it is straightforward to disaggregate to national and regional levels (e.g., Han et al. 2014), or conversely to aggregate to the global level. KBAs span all ecosystem types through the marine environment (Edgar et al. 2008) and beyond. The indicator can therefore be reported in combination across marine systems along with terrestrial or freshwater systems, or disaggregated among them. However, individual KBAs can encompass marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems simultaneously, and so determining the results is not simply additive. </p>
<h2>Description : </h2>
<h2>Cet indicateur a été classé par l'IAEG-ODD comme étant de niveau 1. Des données actuelles sont disponibles pour tous les pays du monde, et elles sont mises à jour en permanence.</p>
<h2>Séries chronologiques :</h2>
<p>~150 ans </p>
<h2>Désagrégation:</h2>
<p>Étant donné que les données de l'indicateur mondial sont compilées au niveau national, il est facile de les désagréger aux niveaux national et régional (par exemple, Han et al. 2014), ou inversement de les agréger au niveau mondial. Les zones clés pour la biodiversité couvrent tous les types d'écosystèmes jusqu'à l'environnement marin (Edgar et al. 2008) et au-delà. L'indicateur peut donc être rapporté en combinaison dans les systèmes marins ainsi que dans les systèmes terrestres ou d'eau douce, ou désagrégé entre eux. Cependant, les zones clés pour la biodiversité individuelles peuvent englober simultanément des systèmes marins, terrestres et d'eau douce, et la détermination des résultats n'est donc pas simplement additive. Enfin, l'indicateur peut être désagrégé selon les différentes catégories de gestion des aires protégées (catégories I à VI) pour refléter les différents objectifs de gestion spécifiques des aires protégées.</p>
<p>Outre l'agrégation de la couverture des aires protégées dans les sites importants pour la biodiversité marine en tant qu'indicateur de l'ODD 14.5, d'autres désagrégations de la couverture des aires protégées particulièrement pertinentes en tant qu'indicateurs des cibles des ODD (Brooks et al. 2016) comprennent :</p>
<p>ODD 15.1.2 Proportion de sites importants pour la biodiversité terrestre et d'eau douce qui sont couverts par des aires protégées, par type d'écosystème.</p>
<p>ODD 15.4.1 Couverture par des aires protégées de sites importants pour la biodiversité des montagnes.</p>
<p>Les données sur la couverture des zones protégées peuvent être combinées avec d'autres sources de données pour produire d'autres indicateurs complémentaires. Par exemple, la superposition des aires protégées avec des cartes éco-régionales peut être utilisée pour fournir des informations sur la couverture par les aires protégées de différentes grandes régions biogéographiques. La couverture par les aires protégées des distributions de différents groupes d'espèces (par exemple, mammifères, oiseaux) peut également fournir des indicateurs des tendances de la couverture de la biodiversité au niveau des espèces. La couverture des aires protégées peut être combinée avec l'indice de la liste rouge pour générer des indicateurs de l'impact des aires protégées sur la réduction de la perte de biodiversité (Butchart et al. 2012). Enfin, les indicateurs dérivés de la superposition des zones protégées peuvent également informer le développement urbain durable ; par exemple, la superposition des zones protégées sur les cartes urbaines pourrait fournir un indicateur de l'espace public en tant que proportion de l'espace global de la ville.</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

Source string changed

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p><strong>Data availability:</strong></p>
<p>This indicator has been classified by the IAEG-SDGs as Tier 1. Current data are available for all countries in the world, and these are updated on an ongoing basis. Index values for each country are available in the UN SDG Indicators Database <a href="https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/">https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/</a>. Graphs of Protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity AreaBAs are also available for each country in the BIP Indicators Dashboard (<a href="https://bipdashboard.natureserve.org/bip/SelectCountry.html">https://bipdashboard.natureserve.org/bip/SelectCountry.html</a>), and the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool Country Profiles (<a href="https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>).</p>
<p>Underlying data on protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are available at <a href="http://www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>. Data on Key Biodiversity AreaBAs are available at <a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org">www.keybiodiversityareas.org</a>. Data on subsets of KBAs are available for Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas at <a href="http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search">http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/search</a> and for Alliance for Zero Extinction sites at https://zeroextinction.org.</p>
<p><strong>Disaggregation:</strong></p>
<p>Given that data for the global indicator are compiled at national levels, it is straightforward to disaggregate to national and regional levels (e.g., Han et al. 2014), or conversely to aggregate to the global level. Key Biodiversity AreaBAs span all ecosystem types through the marine environment (Edgar et al. 2008) and beyond. The indicator can therefore be reported in combination across marine systems along with terrestrial or freshwater systems, or disaggregated among them. However, individual Key Biodiversity AreaBAs can encompass marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems simultaneously, and so determining the results is not simply additive. </p>
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p>High.</p>
<p><br>Each custodian agency is responsible for quality management of their own database.<br>Quality assessment of the indicator is shared between he indicator custodian agencies.</p>
<p>Élevée.</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

Source string changed

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p>High.</p>
<p><br>Each custodian agency is responsible for quality management of their own database.<br>Quality assessment of the indicator is shared between he indicator custodian agencies.</p>
a year ago
User avatar None

String updated in the repository

  1. SDG Metadata
  2. 14-5-1
  3. French
<p>Information on the process of how protected area data are collected, standardised and published is available in the WDPA User Manual at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a> which is available in English, French and Spanish. Specific guidance is provided at <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a> on, for example, predefined fields or look up tables in the WDPA: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, how WDPA records are coded how international designations and regional designations data is collected, how regularly is the database updated, and how to perform protected areas coverage statistics. </p>
<p>Data quality in the process of identifying KBAs is ensured through processes established by the KBAs Partnership (<a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners</a>) and KBAs Secretariat. Data quality is ensured through wide stakeholder engagement in the KBA proposal process, data checking by Regional Focal Points, formal Review of KBA Proposals by independent Reviewers, and validation of Nominations by the KBAs Secretariat. </p>
<p>In addition, the Chairs of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and World Commission on Protected Areas (both of whom are elected by the IUCN Membership of governments and non-governmental organisations), appoint the Chair of an independent KBAs Standards and Appeals Committee, which ensures the correct application of the Global Standard for the identification of KBAs, and oversees a formal Procedure for handling of appeals against the identification of KBAs (see http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/assets/1b388c918e14c5f4c3d7a0237eb0d366).</p>
<p>Before submission to the UN SDG Indicators database the annually updated indicators of coverage of KBAs by protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures are incorporated into updated Country Profiles on the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (<a href="https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles">https://ibat-alliance.org/country_profiles</a>) and then sent for consultation to National Focal Points of the Convention on Biological Diversity (<a href="https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), National Statistics Offices SDG Representatives and UN Permanent Missions (Geneva) representatives. </p>
<h2>Assurance qualité : </h2>
<p>Le processus de collecte, de normalisation et de publication des données est disponible dans le manuel de l'utilisateur de la WDPA à l'adresse suivante : <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-manual</a> qui est disponible en anglais, français et espagnol. Des conseils spécifiques sont fournis à l'adresse <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/world-database-on-protected-areas</a> sur, par exemple, les champs prédéfinis ou les tables de recherche dans la WDPA : <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables">https://www.protectedplanet.net/c/wdpa-lookup-tables</a>, comment les enregistrements de la WDPA sont codés, comment les données sur les désignations internationales et régionales sont collectées, à quelle fréquence la base de données est mise à jour et comment réaliser des statistiques sur la couverture des zones protégées. </p>
<p> Le processus d'identification des zones clés pour la biodiversité est soutenu par le partenariat des zones clés pour la biodiversité (<a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-partners</a>). Parmi les rôles du partenariat figure la mise en place du secrétariat des zones clés pour la biodiversité, qui vérifie les informations soumises lors de la phase de désignation des sites pour s'assurer de l'application correcte de la norme relative aux zones clés pour la biodiversité (<a href="https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259">https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259</a>) et de l'adéquation de la documentation relative au site, puis vérifie le site, qui est ensuite publié sur le site Web des zones clés pour la biodiversité (<a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/get-involved</a>). En outre, les présidents de la Commission de la sauvegarde des espèces et de la Commission mondiale des aires protégées de l'UICN (tous deux élus par les membres de l'UICN, à savoir les gouvernements et les organisations non gouvernementales), nomment le président d'un comité indépendant, le Key Biodiversity Areas Standards and Appeals Committee, qui veille à l'application correcte de la norme mondiale pour l'identification des Key Biodiversity Areas. Le code R pour le calcul de la couverture des zones protégées des zones clés pour la biodiversité est documenté comme Dias, M. (2017) &#x201C;Code R pour le calcul de la couverture des zones protégées des ZCB&#x201D;. (<a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/userfiles/files/R_code_for_calculating_protected_area_coverage_of_KBAs_March_2017.pdf">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/userfiles/files/R_code_for_calculating_protected_area_coverage_of_KBAs_March_2017.pdf</a>) </p>
<p>Outre la diffusion via le site web de Protected Planet (<a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>), le processus de la liste des Nations unies décrit au point 3.1 le fait que les données sur les aires protégées sont collectées auprès d'agences nationales reconnues dans les métadonnées de la WDPA, et le site web des zones clés pour la biodiversité (<a href="http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home">http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/home</a>), les données de Protected Planet et des zones clés pour la biodiversité sont diffusées via l'outil d'évaluation intégrée de la biodiversité, disponible en ligne pour la recherche et la conservation (<a href="https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/">https://www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat-conservation/</a>). Cet outil intègre les profils nationaux de tous les pays du monde, qui comprennent une documentation sur l'indicateur de couverture des zones protégées des zones clés pour la biodiversité. Chaque mise à jour annuelle de ces profils nationaux est envoyée pour consultation aux points focaux nationaux de la Convention sur la diversité biologique (<a href="https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml">https://www.cbd.int/information/nfp.shtml</a>), aux représentants des OMD des bureaux nationaux de statistiques et aux représentants des missions permanentes des Nations unies (Genève).</p>
a year ago
Browse all translation changes