SDG Metadata/14-4-1 — Russian @ Hosted Weblate

32	Strings	9%	Browse Translate
6,406	Words	1%
52,081	Characters	1%

Strings Words Characters
32 6,406 52,081	All strings	Browse Translate Zen
3 76 579	Translated strings	Browse Translate Zen
3 76 579	Strings waiting for review	Browse Translate Zen
29 6,330 51,502	Unfinished strings	Browse Translate Zen
10 895 6,430	Untranslated strings	Browse Translate Zen
19 5,435 45,072	Strings marked for edit	Browse Translate Zen
29 6,330 51,502	Unfinished strings without suggestions	Browse Translate Zen
20 5,517 45,733	Strings with any failing checks	Browse Translate Zen
1 160 1,097	Failing check: Double space	Browse Translate Zen
2 83 671	Failing check: Inconsistent	Browse Translate Zen
17 5,359 44,531	Failing check: Mismatching line breaks	Browse Translate Zen
1 1,956 18,797	Failing check: XML syntax	Browse Translate Zen
17 3,478 26,265	Failing check: XML markup	Browse Translate Zen
1 624 5,357	Failing check: Consecutive duplicated words	Browse Translate Zen

Component	Approved	Translated	Unfinished	Unfinished words	Unfinished characters	Untranslated	Checks	Suggestions	Comments
14-2-1 MIT	0%	0%	32	1,271	10,020	32	0	0	0

6-3-2 MIT	0%	0%	32	2,729	22,313	32	0	0	0

10-5-1 MIT	0%	6%	28	1,975	13,545	7	21	0	0

6-6-1a MIT	0%	6%	30	10,745	525,758	11	19	0	0

15-b-1 MIT	0%	8%	22	1,627	12,648	1	19	0	0

16-2-3 MIT	0%	0%	28	1,626	11,509	28	0	0	0

1-2-2 MIT	0%	0%	32	13,237	230,585	32	0	0	0

14-5-1 MIT	0%	9%	29	5,535	45,226	10	21	0	0

1-a-2 MIT	0%	0%	31	1,382	11,649	31	0	0	0

1-5-2 MIT	0%	0%	13	886	8,004	13	0	0	0

Project website	github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata
Instructions for translators	This project is limited to Russian translation only, for now. More detailed instructions to come.
Project maintainers	brockfanning
Translation license	MIT License
Translation process	Translations can be made directly. Translation suggestions are turned off. Translations are reviewed by dedicated reviewers. Any authenticated user can contribute. The translation uses monolingual files. The translation base language can not be edited.
Source code repository	`https://github.com/worldbank/sdg-metadata`
Repository branch	master
Last remote commit	Merge pull request #542 from weblate/weblate-sdg-metadata-1-1-1a `85d59a4a6e9` brockfanning authored 2 weeks ago
Last commit in Weblate	Translated using Weblate (French) `6788052f2ac` deblsyl authored a year ago
Weblate repository	`https://hosted.weblate.org/git/sdg-metadata/1-1-1a/`
File mask	`translations-metadata/*/14-4-1.yml`
Monolingual base language file	`translations-metadata/en/14-4-1.yml`
Translation file	Download `translations-metadata/ru/14-4-1.yml`
Last change	Aug. 19, 2023, 5:01 p.m.
Last author	None

	Strings percent	Hosted strings	Words percent	Hosted words	Characters percent	Hosted characters
Total		32		6,406		52,081
Approved	0%	0	0%	0	0%	0
Waiting for review	9%	3	1%	76	1%	579
Translated	9%	3	1%	76	1%	579
Needs editing	59%	19	84%	5,435	86%	45,072
Read-only	0%	0	0%	0	0%	0
Failing checks	62%	20	86%	5,517	87%	45,733
Strings with suggestions	0%	0	0%	0	0%	0
Untranslated strings	31%	10	13%	895	12%	6,430

None Resource updated SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	The “`translations-metadata/en/14-4-1.yml`” file was changed. 8 months ago
None String updated in the repository SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	English <p>At this moment, data collection is separate for the national and regional/global levels.</p> <p>Global/regional level: </p> <p>The fish stocks that FAO has monitored since 1974 represent a wide spectrum of data availability, ranging from data-rich and formally assessed stocks to those that have very little information apart from catch statistics by FAO major fishing area and those with no stock assessment at all. For the purposes of using the best available data and information and maintaining consistency among stocks and assessors, a procedure has been defined to identify relevant stock status information (FAO 2011).</p> <p>National level: </p> <p>FAO collects national data through a questionnaire sent to the Principal Focal Point (PFP) of each country. The PFP organises an institutional set-up which identifies the competent authorities to develop a reference list of stocks and completes the questionnaire. </p> <p>During the initial stages of national data reporting, the information or data collected through the questionnaire from a country will initially only inform the indicator for the individual countries, also acknowledging the need for a learning curve along the few first questionnaire inquiries. As a result, the global/regional indicator remains during these initial stages separate from the national indicators. However, FAO is working on a convergence (where possible) of the two processes, and good-quality stock status assessments reported by countries for the national indicators will be included in the regional/global indicator calculations, depending on the evolution and further standardization of country reporting over the next 3-5 years..</p> <p>Despite this effort, due to the heterogeneity of reporting from countries in the same FAO Major Fishing Area, and the necessary inclusion of straddling and highly migratory stocks and fisheries in the regional and global indicator, it is unlikely that a full convergence will be achieved in a short time-frame.</p> <p>The indicator is applicable for countries with marine borders (or those bordering the Caspian Sea) and therefore excludes landlocked countries from data collection and processing. </p> Russian 0 characters edited Current translation Empty 8 months ago
None String updated in the repository SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	English 2023-05-15 Russian 0 characters edited Current translation Needs editing <p> Последнее обновление: 13 июля 2020 года </p> 8 months ago
None Source string changed SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	202~~2-03-31~~3-05-15 8 months ago
None Resource updated SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	The “`translations-metadata/en/14-4-1.yml`” file was changed. 2 years ago
None String updated in the repository SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	English <p><strong>URL: </strong></p> <h2>FAO 2016-2021. Sustainable Development Goals. Indicator 14.4.1 - Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels. <a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/">http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/</a> </h2> <p>FAO 2019-2021. SDG 14.4.1 eLearning course. <a href="https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502">https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502</a></p> <p>FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Fishing areas for statistical purpose. <a href="https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/">https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/</a> </p> <p>FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Identifiers for aquatic animals and plants: <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/</a></p> <p>FAO 2004-2021. FIRMS Information Management Policy - Annex 1.2 - List of reference terms for Marine Resources. Updated June 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ax530e.pdf</p> <p><strong>References:</strong></p> <p>Branch, T.A., Jensen, O.P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. & Hilborn, R. (2011) Contrasting global trends in marine fishery status obtained from catches and from stock assessments. Conservation Biology, 25: 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.</p> <p>Caddy, J.R. and Mahon, R. (1995). Reference Points for fisheries management. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 337. Rome, FAO. 83p.</p> <p>Cadima, E.L. (2003) Fish stock assessment manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 393. Rome, FAO. 161p.</p> <p>FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. 41 pp.</p> <p>FAO (2005) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 457. Rome. 235 pp</p> <p>FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO technical paper 569: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm">http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm</a>. </p> <p>Haddon, M. (2011). Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 465 p.</p> <p>Hilborn, R., R.O. Amoroso, C.M. Anderson, J.K. Baum, T.A. Branch, C. Costello, C.L. de Moor, et al. 2020. “Effective Fisheries Management Instrumental in Improving Fish Stock Status.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (4): 2218–24. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/">https://doi.org/10.1073/</a> pnas.1909726116.</p> <p>Sparre P. & Venema, S.C. (1998). Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 306.1, Rev. 2. Rome, FAO. 407p.</p> <p>UN (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. 40 pp.</p> <p>Appendix 1</p> <p>Guidelines to establish reference list of stocks.</p> <p>The reference list compiles a list of fish stocks based on data from the considered area, i.e. a country’s EEZ and/or territorial waters and/or possibly the competence area of a regional fisheries management organization. This list of fish stocks will ideally include existing Assessment units or Management units, and also possibly other unassessed fish stocks that are fished in a given country. The list will exclude stocks straddling in the high seas, mostly tuna and tuna-like species.</p> <p>This list should:</p> <ol> <li>Represent at least 60% (a higher percent is preferred when possible) of the national total landed and/or reported catch (Total in Tonnes excluding landings from straddling stocks). Information should be provided on all of the stocks that contribute to this top 60% (or more) of landings regardless of whether their status is known. Stocks should be input from left to right on the spreadsheet in the order of the largest to smallest total landings for each stock, by Tonnes. Species with multiple different stocks should be input as separate stocks. </li> <li>Contain stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations. If possible, the list should represent stocks of each of these categories for a given country. For example, care should be taken to include fish stocks that are important to small-scale fisheries as well as large-scale industrial fisheries. Consideration for these different categories will vary between countries.</li> <li>Remain unchanged (i.e. for at least 5 years) to better reflect changes in stock status at the national level and minimize the effect of changing the reference list of stocks (i.e., adding, deleting, merging stocks) into the SDG indicator. This will ensure consistency in the indicator calculation and better reflect fish stock sustainability over time.</li> </ol> <p>Appendix 2</p> <p>Complete list of questions to countries to inform the indicator. Pink cells are mandatory, white cells are optional. </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1. REFERENCE LIST OF FISH STOCKS & STATUS</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.1 Stock Name</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.2 Stock Jurisdictional distribution</strong></p> <p><strong>(Please type "X" in the relevant box)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>National</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Shared between Nations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.3 For shared stocks only, please list the exploiting countries</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.4 Please indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.5 Method of assessment</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>If "Yes" assessed, please indicate which approach was used: (1) Classic; (2) Data-limited ; (3) Unspecified</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>If "No" please indicate best available knowledge used to define stock status (e.g. trends over catch rates or abundance index)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.6 Current stock status</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Indicate whether the stock is biologically sustainable (Yes or No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Assessment year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Indicate source references of the official stock assessment or other information, including web links to online documents when available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.7 Total landings for the entire stock</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Reference year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Proportion of total landings from the total national landings (excluding landings from straddling stocks) (in percentage)</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1 STOCK INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.1 Stock name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Name of the individual stock</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.2 Scientific name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species scientific name, preferably according to ASFIS List of Species for Fishery Statistics Purposes</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.3 Common name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species common name in English (if available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Species common name in local language (list more than one if relevant)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.4 FAO Major Fishing Area/ with sub-levels when appropriate</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the FAO major fishing area</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the area sub-levels where appropriate</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1.5 Stock is considered as ...</strong></p> <p><strong>(possible to select multiple answers, place "X" in the relevant cell(s))</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>... Assessment Unit (for stocks with an available official stock assessment)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Management Unit (Unit that is used to implement management measures based on a stock assessment or not)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Other (i.e., Species x Area) unit (if none of the above)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.8 Management Agency/Advisory Body</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Management agency or advisory body responsible for assessment (if assessment unit) or management (if management unit)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.2 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.1 Assessment status (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.2 Overfished (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfished" with respect to abundance reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: if stock is overfished then is not biologically sustainable (please answer NO in question Line 15, Section 1). When possible, support your answer with information on Section 2.3 (for example, current biomass is less than biomass target reference point)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.3 Overfishing (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfishing" with respect to fishing mortality reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: see e-learning course on how to link fishing mortality reference points to biological sustainability.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.4 Assessment method/software</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>If there is an official stock assessment available please indicate which method or software used. For example: stock synthesis; ASPIC, MULTIFAN-CL; VIT, CPUE trends, catch trends, size/length trends, none, others</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.5 Assessment availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The assessment is publicly available (Yes or No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.6 Source references</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>List of Source references used to collect information, including web links to online documents when available</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.7 Reliability (L/M/H)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>High (H) – Formal stock assessment at the regional, national or local levels forms the foundation of the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Medium (M) – Grey data/information and catch trend analysis provide the basis for the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Low (L) – Black data/information and qualitative assessment (e.g. experts judgement) were used for the classification of stock status</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3 INPUT DATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Data availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Input data needed for the stock assessment</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.1 Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current Biomass</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent biomass or abundance in tonnes (NA if not available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Virgin/pristine stock biomass (B0)</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the biomass or abundance target reference point in tonnes (i.e. prime stock biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Target Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of biomass or abundance reference point used (e.g. 0.4B0; BMSY, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current Biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.2 Fishing mortality</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current F</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent fishing mortality (F) or exploitation rate (U)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>F Reference Point</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the fishing mortality reference point</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of fishing mortality reference point used (e.g. FMSY, F01, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current F)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.3 CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch per unit of effort</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Units of CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Unit (e.g. kg/trap), in case CPUE is not standardized</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.4 Catches</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current catch</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch (in tonnes)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current catch</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Average Catch Max</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of maximum catch in the time series (in tonnes) (after 5 years smoothing)</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong>3. SUPPORTING TIME SERIES</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong><em><u>Time series are optional but recommended to be reported by stock for all available years</u></em></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Fish Stock ID</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Year</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Catches (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Exploitation rate</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Fishing Effort</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>METADATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1. The reference list of stocks represent at least 60% of the current total national landed and/or reported catch statistics?</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1a. If answered "No", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. The reference list of stocks contains all stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3. Please indicate the frequency of stock assessment</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3a. If answered "Other", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. If the SDG indicator 14.4.1 is reported in the national SDG portal, database, or other please indicate the address</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2a. Please provide additional addresses if available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>4. Any additional information:</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Russian 0 characters edited Current translation Needs editing <h1>Ссылки</h1> <h2>URL:</h2> <p><strong>ЦУР 14.4.1:</strong> <a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/">http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/</a></p> <p><strong>Электронный учебный курс: </strong><a href="https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502">https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502</a></p> <h2>Ссылки:</h2> <p>Branch, T.A., Jensen, O.P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. & Hilborn, R. (2011) Contrasting global trends in marine fishery status obtained from catches and from stock assessments. <em>Conservation Biology</em>, 25: 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.</p> <p>FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. 41 pp.</p> <p>FAO (2005) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 457. Rome. 235 pp</p> <p>FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO technical paper 569: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm">http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm</a>.</p> <p>ООН (1995 г.) Соглашение об осуществлении положений Конвенции Организации Объединённых Наций по морскому праву от 10 декабря 1982 года, которые касаются сохранения трансграничных рыбных запасов и запасов далеко мигрирующих рыб и управления ими. 40 стр.</p> <h1>Приложение 1</h1> <p>Рекомендации по составлению справочного списка запасов.</p> <p>Справочный список представляет собой список рыбных запасов, составленный на основе данных из рассматриваемого района, то есть ИЭЗ страны и / или территориальных вод и / или, возможно, зоны компетенции региональной рыбохозяйственной организации. Этот список рыбных запасов в идеале должен включать существующие единицы оценки или единицы управления, а также, возможно, другие неоцененные рыбные запасы, которые вылавливаются в данной стране. В список не будут включены запасы трансграничных видов в открытом море, в основном тунец и скумбриевидные тунцы.</p> <p>Список должен:</p> <ol> <li>Представлять не менее 60% (по возможности предпочтителен более высокий процент) национального общего выгруженного и / или зарегистрированного вылова (всего в тоннах, исключая выгрузки трансграничных запасов). Информация должна быть предоставлена по всем запасам, которые составляют эти 60% (или более) максимальных выгрузок, независимо от того, известен ли их статус. Запасы следует вводить в таблицу слева направо в порядке от наибольшей до наименьшей общей выгрузки для каждого запаса в тоннах. Виды с несколькими разными рыбными запасами следует вводить как отдельные рыбные запасы. </li> <li>Содержать запасы, имеющие большое значение с точки зрения улова, роли экосистемы, экономической значимости и социальных / культурных соображений. Если возможно, в списке должны быть представлены запасы каждой из этих категорий для данной страны. Например, следует позаботиться о включении рыбных запасов, которые важны для маломасштабного рыболовства, а также для крупномасштабного промышленного рыболовства. Важность этих различных категорий для разных стран будет различаться.</li> <li>Оставаться без изменений (то есть в течение как минимум 5 лет), чтобы лучше отражать изменения в состоянии запасов на национальном уровне и минимизировать влияние изменения справочного списка запасов (т.е. добавление, удаление, объединение запасов) в показателе ЦУР. Это обеспечит согласованность в расчетах показателя и лучше отразит устойчивость рыбных запасов с течением времени.</li> </ol> <h1>Приложение 2</h1> <p>Полный список вопросов к странам для наполнения показателя. Розовые клетки являются обязательными, белые клетки - необязательными.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1. СТАТУС СПРАВОЧНОГО СПИСКА РЫБНЫХ ЗАПАСОВ</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.1 Название запаса</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.2 Юрисдикционное распределение запасов</strong></p> <p><strong>(Пожалуйста, введите "X" в соответствующее поле)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Национальные</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Совместные</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.3 Только для совместных запасов укажите страны-пользователи</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.4 Укажите, оценен ли запас (да) или не оценен (нет)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.5 Метод оценки</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Если оценен "Да", укажите, какой подход использовался: (1) Классический; (2) С ограниченными данными; (3) Не указано</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Если "Нет" укажите наилучшие имеющиеся знания, используемые для определения состояния запаса (например, тенденции изменения уровней вылова или индекса численности)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.6 Текущее состояние запасов</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Укажите, является ли запас биологически устойчивым (да или нет)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Год оценки</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Укажите ссылки на источники официальной оценки запасов или другую информацию, включая веб-ссылки на онлайн-документы, если таковые имеются</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.7 Полная выгрузка для всего запаса</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Выгрузки (в тоннах)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Отчетный год</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Доля общих выгрузок от общего количества выгрузок в стране (без учета выгрузок трансграничных запасов) (в процентах)</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1 ИНДИВИДУАЛЬНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ О ЗАПАСЕ</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.1 Название запаса</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Название индивидуального запаса</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.2 Научное название</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Научное название вида, предпочтительно согласно Списку видов для целей статистики рыболовства Классификации водных видов АСФИС</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.3 Общепринятое название</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Общепринятое название вида на английском языке (при наличии)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Общепринятое название вида на местном языке (при необходимости перечислите более одного вида)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.4Основные рыболовные районы ФАО / с подуровнями, когда это необходимо</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Укажите код основного рыболовного района ФАО.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>При необходимости укажите код субуровней области.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1.5 Запас считается...</strong></p> <p><strong>(можно выбрать несколько ответов, поместите "X" в соответствующие ячейки)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>... Единица оценки (для запасов с доступной официальной оценкой запасов)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Единица управления (Единица, которая используется для реализации мер управления на основе оценки запасов или нет)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>…Другая единица (например, виды x площадь) (если не подходит ничего из вышеперечисленного)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.8 Управляющее агентство / Консультативный орган</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Управляющее агентство или консультативный орган, ответственный за оценку (если является подразделением оценки) или управление (если является подразделением управления)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.2 ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ДЛЯ ОЦЕНКИ</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.1 Статус оценки (Да, Нет)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Укажите, является ли запас оцененным (да) или неоцененным (нет)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.2 Переловлено (да, нет, неизвестно)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Официальная оценка запасов приводит к выводу «Переловлено» относительно справочных точек численности (Да, Нет, Неизвестно). Примечание: если запасы истощены, они не являются биологически устойчивыми (ответьте НЕТ в вопросной строке 15, Раздел 1). По возможности подкрепите свой ответ информацией по Разделу 2.3 (например, текущая биомасса меньше целевой справочной точки биомассы)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.3 Перелов (да, нет, неизвестно)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Официальная оценка запасов приводит к выводу "перелавливается" относительно справочных точек промысловой смертности (Да, Нет, Неизвестно). Примечание: см. Курс электронного обучения о том, как связать справочные точки промысловой смертности с биологической устойчивостью.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.4 Метод / программное обеспечение оценки</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Если имеется официальная оценка запасов, укажите, какой метод или программное обеспечение использовалось. Например: синтез запасов; ASPIC, MULTIFAN-CL; VIT, тренды CPUE, тренды улова, тренды размера / длины, нет, другое</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.5 Доступность оценки (да, нет)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Оценка общедоступна (да или нет)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.6 Ссылки на источники</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Список ссылок на источники, используемых для сбора информации, включая веб-ссылки на онлайн-документы, если таковые имеются</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.7 Надежность (низкая / средняя / высокая)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Высокая (В) Официальная оценка запасов на региональном, национальном или местном уровнях формирует основу классификации состояния запасов;</p> <p>Средняя (С) Серые данные / информация и анализ тенденций улова служат основой для классификации состояния запасов;</p> <p>Низкая (Н) Черные данные / информация и качественная оценка (например, оценка экспертов) использовались для классификации состояния запасов.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3 ИСХОДНЫЕ ДАННЫЕ</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Доступность данных (да, нет)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Исходные данные, необходимые для оценки запасов</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.1 Численность</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Текущая биомасса</p> </td> <td> <p>Последние данные о биомассе или численности в тоннах (ДО, если данные отсутствуют)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Первичный / нетронутый запас биомассы(Б0)</p> </td> <td> <p>Величина целевой контрольной точки биомассы или численности в тоннах (т.е. биомасса основного запаса)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Тип целевой контрольной точки</p> </td> <td> <p>Тип или численность используемой контрольной точки биомассы (например, 0,4B0; BMSY и т. д.)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Отчетный год</p> </td> <td> <p>Последний год входных данных, использованных в оценке (т.е. год текущей биомассы)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.2 Промысловая смертность</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Текущая F</p> </td> <td> <p>Последний уровень промысловой смертности (F) или эксплуатации (U)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Контрольная точка F</p> </td> <td> <p>Значение контрольной точки промысловой смертности</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Тип контрольной точки</p> </td> <td> <p>Тип используемой контрольной точки промысловой смертности (например, FMSY, F01 и т. д.)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Отчетный год</p> </td> <td> <p>Последний год исходных данных, использованных в оценке (т.е. год текущей F)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.3 Улов на единицу промыслового усилия</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Текущий улов на единицу промыслового усилия</p> </td> <td> <p>Текущая стоимость улова на единицу промыслового усилия</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Единицы улова на единицу промыслового усилия</p> </td> <td> <p>Единица (например, кг / невод), если улов на единицу промыслового усилия не стандартизирован</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Год текущего улова на единицу промыслового усилия</p> </td> <td> <p>Год текущего улова на единицу промыслового усилия</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.4 Уловы</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Текущий улов</p> </td> <td> <p>Текущая величина улова (в тоннах)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Отчетный год/p> </td> <td> <p>Год текущего улова</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Средний максимальный улов</p> </td> <td> <p>Величина максимального улова во временных рядах (в тоннах) (после 5-летнего сглаживания)</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong>3. ПОДДЕРЖКА ВРЕМЕННЫХ РЯДОВ</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong><em><u>Временные ряды необязательны, но рекомендуется отчитываться по запасам за все доступные годы</u></em></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Идентификатор рыбного запаса</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Год</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Выгрузки (в тоннах)</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Уловы (в тоннах)</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Численность</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Улов на единицу промыслового усилия</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Уровень эксплуатации</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Промысловое усилие</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Единица обследования</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Единица</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Единица обследования</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Единица</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Единица обследования</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Единица</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Единица обследования</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Единица</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>МЕТАДАННЫЕ</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1. Справочный список запасов составляет не менее 60% текущей общенациональной статистики выгруженного и / или зарегистрированного улова?</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1a. Если ответили "Нет", уточните</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. Справочный список запасов содержит все запасы, имеющие большое значение с точки зрения улова, роли экосистемы, экономической значимости и социальных / культурных соображений</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3. Укажите периодичность оценки запасов</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3a. Если ответили "Другое", уточните</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2.Если показатель 14.4.1 ЦУР представлен на национальном портале ЦУР, в базе данных или другом месте, укажите адрес</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2a. Укажите дополнительные адреса, если они доступны</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>4. Любая дополнительная информация:</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> 2 years ago
None Source string changed SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	<p><strong>URL: </strong></p> <h2>@FAO 2016-2021. Sustainable Development Goals. Indicator 14.4.1 - Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels. <a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/">http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/</a> </h2> <p>@FAO 2019-2021. SDG 14.4.1 eLearning course. <a href="https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502">https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502</a></p> <p>@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Fishing areas for statistical purpose. <a href="https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/~~fishing-areas-for-statistical-purpose~~main-water-areas/en/">https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/~~fishing-areas-for-statistical-purpose~~main-water-areas/en/</a> </p> <p>@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Identifiers for aquatic animals and plants: <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/</a></p> <p>@FAO 2004-2021. FIRMS Information Management Policy - Annex 1.2 - List of reference terms for Marine Resources. Updated June 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ax530e.pdf</p> <p><strong>References:</strong></p> <p>Branch, T.A., Jensen, O.P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. & Hilborn, R. (2011) Contrasting global trends in marine fishery status obtained from catches and from stock assessments. Conservation Biology, 25: 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.</p> <p>Caddy, J.R. and Mahon, R. (1995). Reference Points for fisheries management. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 337. Rome, FAO. 83p.</p> <p>Cadima, E.L. (2003) Fish stock assessment manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 393. Rome, FAO. 161p.</p> <p>FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. 41 pp.</p> <p>FAO (2005) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 457. Rome. 235 pp</p> <p>FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO technical paper 569: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm">http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm</a>. </p> <p>Haddon, M. (2011). Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 465 p.</p> <p>Hilborn, R., R.O. Amoroso, C.M. Anderson, J.K. Baum, T.A. Branch, C. Costello, C.L. de Moor, et al. 2020. “Effective Fisheries Management Instrumental in Improving Fish Stock Status.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (4): 2218–24. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/">https://doi.org/10.1073/</a> pnas.1909726116.</p> <p>Sparre P. & Venema, S.C. (1998). Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 306.1, Rev. 2. Rome, FAO. 407p.</p> <p>UN (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. 40 pp.</p> <p>Appendix 1</p> <p>Guidelines to establish reference list of stocks.</p> <p>The reference list compiles a list of fish stocks based on data from the considered area, i.e. a country’s EEZ and/or territorial waters and/or possibly the competence area of a regional fisheries management organization. This list of fish stocks will ideally include existing Assessment units or Management units, and also possibly other unassessed fish stocks that are fished in a given country. The list will exclude stocks straddling in the high seas, mostly tuna and tuna-like species.</p> <p>This list should:</p> <ol> <li>Represent at least 60% (a higher percent is preferred when possible) of the national total landed and/or reported catch (Total in Tonnes excluding landings from straddling stocks). Information should be provided on all of the stocks that contribute to this top 60% (or more) of landings regardless of whether their status is known. Stocks should be input from left to right on the spreadsheet in the order of the largest to smallest total landings for each stock, by Tonnes. Species with multiple different stocks should be input as separate stocks. </li> <li>Contain stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations. If possible, the list should represent stocks of each of these categories for a given country. For example, care should be taken to include fish stocks that are important to small-scale fisheries as well as large-scale industrial fisheries. Consideration for these different categories will vary between countries.</li> <li>Remain unchanged (i.e. for at least 5 years) to better reflect changes in stock status at the national level and minimize the effect of changing the reference list of stocks (i.e., adding, deleting, merging stocks) into the SDG indicator. This will ensure consistency in the indicator calculation and better reflect fish stock sustainability over time.</li> </ol> <p>Appendix 2</p> <p>Complete list of questions to countries to inform the indicator. Pink cells are mandatory, white cells are optional. </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1. REFERENCE LIST OF FISH STOCKS & STATUS</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.1 Stock Name</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.2 Stock Jurisdictional distribution</strong></p> <p><strong>(Please type "X" in the relevant box)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>National</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Shared between Nations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.3 For shared stocks only, please list the exploiting countries</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.4 Please indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.5 Method of assessment</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>If "Yes" assessed, please indicate which approach was used: (1) Classic; (2) Data-limited ; (3) Unspecified</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>If "No" please indicate best available knowledge used to define stock status (e.g. trends over catch rates or abundance index)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.6 Current stock status</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Indicate whether the stock is biologically sustainable (Yes or No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Assessment year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Indicate source references of the official stock assessment or other information, including web links to online documents when available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.7 Total landings for the entire stock</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Reference year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Proportion of total landings from the total national landings (excluding landings from straddling stocks) (in percentage)</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1 STOCK INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.1 Stock name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Name of the individual stock</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.2 Scientific name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species scientific name, preferably according to ASFIS List of Species for Fishery Statistics Purposes</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.3 Common name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species common name in English (if available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Species common name in local language (list more than one if relevant)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.4 FAO Major Fishing Area/ with sub-levels when appropriate</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the FAO major fishing area</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the area sub-levels where appropriate</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1.5 Stock is considered as ...</strong></p> <p><strong>(possible to select multiple answers, place "X" in the relevant cell(s))</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>... Assessment Unit (for stocks with an available official stock assessment)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Management Unit (Unit that is used to implement management measures based on a stock assessment or not)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Other (i.e., Species x Area) unit (if none of the above)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.8 Management Agency/Advisory Body</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Management agency or advisory body responsible for assessment (if assessment unit) or management (if management unit)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.2 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.1 Assessment status (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.2 Overfished (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfished" with respect to abundance reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: if stock is overfished then is not biologically sustainable (please answer NO in question Line 15, Section 1). When possible, support your answer with information on Section 2.3 (for example, current biomass is less than biomass target reference point)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.3 Overfishing (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfishing" with respect to fishing mortality reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: see e-learning course on how to link fishing mortality reference points to biological sustainability.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.4 Assessment method/software</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>If there is an official stock assessment available please indicate which method or software used. For example: stock synthesis; ASPIC, MULTIFAN-CL; VIT, CPUE trends, catch trends, size/length trends, none, others</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.5 Assessment availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The assessment is publicly available (Yes or No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.6 Source references</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>List of Source references used to collect information, including web links to online documents when available</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.7 Reliability (L/M/H)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>High (H) – Formal stock assessment at the regional, national or local levels forms the foundation of the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Medium (M) – Grey data/information and catch trend analysis provide the basis for the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Low (L) – Black data/information and qualitative assessment (e.g. experts judgement) were used for the classification of stock status</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3 INPUT DATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Data availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Input data needed for the stock assessment</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.1 Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current Biomass</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent biomass or abundance in tonnes (NA if not available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Virgin/pristine stock biomass (B0)</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the biomass or abundance target reference point in tonnes (i.e. prime stock biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Target Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of biomass or abundance reference point used (e.g. 0.4B0; BMSY, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current Biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.2 Fishing mortality</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current F</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent fishing mortality (F) or exploitation rate (U)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>F Reference Point</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the fishing mortality reference point</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of fishing mortality reference point used (e.g. FMSY, F01, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current F)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.3 CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch per unit of effort</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Units of CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Unit (e.g. kg/trap), in case CPUE is not standardized</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.4 Catches</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current catch</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch (in tonnes)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current catch</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Average Catch Max</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of maximum catch in the time series (in tonnes) (after 5 years smoothing)</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong>3. SUPPORTING TIME SERIES</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong><em><u>Time series are optional but recommended to be reported by stock for all available years</u></em></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Fish Stock ID</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Year</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Catches (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Exploitation rate</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Fishing Effort</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>METADATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1. The reference list of stocks represent at least 60% of the current total national landed and/or reported catch statistics?</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1a. If answered "No", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. The reference list of stocks contains all stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3. Please indicate the frequency of stock assessment</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3a. If answered "Other", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. If the SDG indicator 14.4.1 is reported in the national SDG portal, database, or other please indicate the address</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2a. Please provide additional addresses if available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>4. Any additional information:</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> 2 years ago
None String updated in the repository SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	English <p><strong>Data availability:</strong></p> <p>Global/regional: the indicator has global and regional data from 1974 to 2019. Regional breakdown is by FAO major fishing area. The regional and global indicators were calculated based on the reference list of fish stocks FAO established in 1974. Countries are not directly involved in the computation of the indicator at global/regional level. </p> <p>National: the national-level questionnaire was dispatched for the first time in November 2019; FAO identifies 165 countries with a marine border, and three countries with Caspian Sea border, as being eligible, in principle, to report. As the result of the first questionnaire call, ninety-eight countries expressed interest in the indicator (59%), of which eighty-three replied with completed questionnaires while three countries reported the indicator separately (52%), 11 countries stated that they could not report due to lack of data or time, and one responded with some catch data. </p> <p><strong>Time series:</strong></p> <p>Global/regional level: from 1974 to 2017.</p> <p>National level: First questionnaire dispatched in November 2019, considered a trial/testing phase. Upon comprehensive Quality Assurance analysis, FAO reported the full results of this first inquiry through UNSD in February 2022.</p> <p><strong>Disaggregation:</strong></p> <p>By FAO major marine fishing areas for statistical purposes<sup><a href="#footnote-3" id="footnote-ref-3">[3]</a></sup>.</p> <p>Taxonomically, FAO publishes the indicator separately for straddling stocks (mostly tuna and tuna like).</p><div class="footnotes"><div><sup class="footnote-number" id="footnote-3">3</sup><p><a href="https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/area/search">https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/area/search</a> and <a href="https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/">https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/</a> <a href="#footnote-ref-3">↑</a></p></div></div> Russian 0 characters edited Current translation Needs editing <h1>Доступность данных</h1> <h2>Дезагрегирование:</h2> <p>Показатель содержит глобальные данные с 1974 по 2017 год. Региональная разбивка производится по основным рыболовным районам ФАО. Региональные и глобальные показатели рассчитывались на основе справочного списка рыбных запасов, составленного ФАО в 1974 г.</p> <p>Глобальный / региональный уровень: показатель содержит глобальные и региональные данные с 1974 по 2017 год. Региональная разбивка производится по основным промысловым районам ФАО. Страны не принимают непосредственного участия в вычислении показателя на глобальном / региональном уровне. </p> <p>Национальный уровень: вопросник национального уровня был разослан впервые в ноябре 2019 года; ФАО определяет 165 стран как страны, имеющие морскую границу и три страны, имеющие границу с Каспийским морем, и они имеют право в принципе представлять отчеты. В результате первого информационного запроса девяносто семь стран проявили интерес к показателю (57%), из которых 81страна прислала ответ в виде заполненных вопросников, 11 стран заявили, что они не могут предоставить информацию из-за отсутствия данных или времени, одна прислала в ответ некоторые данные по уловам, и три страны представили свои показатели фрагментарно. </p> <h2>Временные ряды</h2> <p>С 1974 по 2017 год</p> <p>Глобальный/региональный уровень: с 1974 по 2018 год.</p> <p>Национальный уровень: Пока не доступно (первый вопросник разослан в ноябре 2019 г.)</p> <h2>Дезагрегирование:</h2> <p>По основным районам морского рыболовства ФАО для статистических целей<sup><a href="#footnote-3" id="footnote-ref-3">[3]</a></sup>.</p> <p>Таксономически ФАО публикует показатель отдельно для трансграничных запасов (в основном тунца и скумбриевидных тунцов).</p><div class="footnotes"><div><sup class="footnote-number" id="footnote-3">3</sup><p><a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposes/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposes/en/</a><a href="#footnote-ref-3">↑</a></p></div></div> 2 years ago
None Source string changed SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	<p><strong>Data availability:</strong></p> <p>TGlobal/regional: the indicator has global and regional data from 1974 to 20179. Regional breakdown is by FAO major fishing area. The regional and global indicators were calculated based on the reference list of fish stocks FAO established in 1974.</p> <p>Global/regional: the indicator has global and regional data from 1974 to 2017. Regional breakdown is by FAO major fishing area. Countries are not directly involved in the computation of the indicator at global/regional level. </p> <p>National: the national-level questionnaire was dispatched for the first time in November 2019; FAO identifies 165 countries with a marine border, and three countries with Caspian Sea border, as being eligible, in principle, to report. As the result of the first questionnaire call, ninety-~~seven~~eight countries expressed interest in the indicator (59%), of which eighty ~~two~~-three replied with completed questionnaires while three countries reported the indicator separately (5~~1.5~~2%), 11 countries stated that they could not report due to lack of data or time, and one responded with some catch data. </p> <p><strong>Time series:</strong></p> ~~<p>From 1974 to 2017.</p>~~ <p>Global/regional level: from 1974 to 20187.</p> <p>National level: ~~Not available yet (f~~First questionnaire dispatched in November 2019, considered a trial/testing phase). Upon comprehensive Quality Assurance analysis, FAO reported the full results of this first inquiry through UNSD in February 2022.</p> <p><strong>Disaggregation:</strong></p> <p>By FAO major marine fishing areas for statistical purposes<sup><~~sup><~~a href="#footnote-43" id="footnote-ref-43">[3]</a></sup>~~</sup>~~.</p> <p>Taxonomically, FAO publishes the indicator separately for straddling stocks (mostly tuna and tuna like).</p><div class="footnotes"><div><sup class="footnote-number" id="footnote-43">3</sup><p>~~http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purpose~~<a href="https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/area/search">https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/area/search</a> and <a href="https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/">https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/</a> <a href="#footnote-ref-43">↑</a></p></div></div> 2 years ago
None String updated in the repository SDG Metadata 14-4-1 Russian	English <p>FAO has in place the necessary frameworks and procedures for quality assurance of the SDG indicators data, according to the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics and the FAO Statistics Quality Assurance Framework (SQAF) available at: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3664e/i3664e.pdf">http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3664e/i3664e.pdf</a>.</p> <p> </p> <p>FAO is systematically carrying out quality assessments to ensure the quality of the SDG indicator data sets. </p> <p>For this indicator, a systematic cross-checking of the various source data was carried out during the overall compilation process of national and regional data.</p> Russian 0 characters edited Current translation Empty 2 years ago

Browse all translation changes

32	File in original format as translated in the repository	YAML file
32	All strings, converted files enriched with comments; suitable for offline translation	Android String Resource	CSV	JSON	JSON nested structure file	gettext PO	iOS strings	TBX	TMX	XLIFF 1.1 with gettext extensions	XLIFF 1.1	XLSX
29	Unfinished strings, converted files enriched with comments; suitable for offline translation	Android String Resource	CSV	JSON	JSON nested structure file	gettext PO	iOS strings	TBX	TMX	XLIFF 1.1 with gettext extensions	XLIFF 1.1	XLSX

Review strings changed by other users	`changed:>=2024-03-19 AND NOT changed_by:anonymous`	Add
Translated strings	`state:>=translated`	Add
Strings with comments	`has:comment`	Add
Strings with any failing checks	`has:check`	Add
Strings with suggestions from others	`has:suggestion AND NOT suggestion_author:anonymous`	Add
Approved strings with suggestions	`state:approved AND has:suggestion`	Add
All untranslated strings added the past month	`added:>=2024-03-19 AND state:<=needs-editing`	Add

SDG Metadata

14-4-1

Russian

Translation status

Strings status

Other components

Overview

String statistics

Activity in last 12 months

Quick numbers

Trends of last 30 days

Quick downloads

Customize download

Search


Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb	Mar